Donald Trump is the exact opposite of John F. Kennedy. And, as with every opposite, there are some things in common. The first of these is Kennedy’s and Trump’s direct relationships with the public, which make them populist presidents, and having made careers in television more than in Congress or the Senate. But while Kennedy did his best to promote the positive aspects of the American spirit, Trump does his best to promote its negative aspects. The curious thing is that both of them reached the presidency against overwhelming odds.
Kennedy’s slogan was “The New Frontier.” A country like his, built by wagons seeking to colonize the West, was thrilled by such a notion. Conversely, what Trump does is close borders and prevent the arrival of new immigrants, which is shocking if one thinks about the fact that every American has a more or less distant ancestor who was an immigrant. Nevertheless, they voted for him. There is no trace of Kennedy’s “Alliance for Progress,” and even less remains of the jewel in the crown, having fought in Europe twice in order to free it from its worst instincts. While Kennedy felt at ease in Paris, in London and in Berlin, Trump does not hide his discomfort towards these countries, and prefers relating to enemies such as Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong Un. A photograph of Trump with arms crossed and surrounded by European leaders stalking him, is telling. It could even be argued that the current American president stands for values that are opposite to those of his country, and the fact that he has trouble not just with his own Republican Party but also with his administration – of which a number of members have been fired – corroborates this. Yet they voted for him, and his approval rating remains steady. There must be something about him, and anyone who approaches the U.S. can feel it.
The American people are angry, and with good reason. They work harder than Europeans, they earn less, their social security is rudimentary, and their burdens are increasing. And they have been saddled, not only with the security of Europe, but of the world, despite the fact that that security blows up on many occasions. Their defense budget is equivalent to that of the 12 countries whose budgets follow behind. They have had enough, and Trump has managed to capitalize on that frustration. They demand more from allies, from rivals, from everybody, and this is when we realize that they have not voted for Trump. They have voted against everyone else. The problem is that his policy against everything and everyone – from climate change to tariff rates – may lead us to disaster. For those wars have no winners, just losers. Hence, we Europeans would be well advised to take Trump seriously, not as a transient aberration in history and in American politics, but as the logical outcome of having carried the weight of global nobility for far too long.
Donald Trump: el presidente del "American First"
Donald Trump es justo lo opuesto a John F. Kennedy. Y como todo lo antagónico, tienen algunas cosas en común. La primera de ellas es su relación directa con el público, lo que les convierte en presidentes populistas y haber hecho su carrera en la televisión más que en el Congreso o en el Senado. Pero mientras Kennedy se esforzó en promover lo positivo del espíritu norteamericano, Trump se esfuerza en promover lo negativo que hay en él. Lo curioso es que tanto el uno como el otro alcanzaron la presidencia teniéndolo casi todo en contra.
El lema de Kennedy era «la nueva frontera». Un país como el suyo, que se ha hecho a base de caravanas en busca de colonizar el Oeste, se entusiasmó con la idea. Trump, en cambio, lo que hace es cerrar fronteras, impedir que lleguen nuevos emigrantes, lo que choca si se piensa que todos los norteamericanos tienen un antepasado más o menos lejano inmigrante. Sin embargo, le votaron. De la Alianza para el Progreso que lanzó Kennedy para Hispanoamérica no queda ni rastro, e incluso la joya de la corona, haber luchado dos veces en Europa para liberarla de sus peores instintos, menos todavía. Mientras Kennedy se sentía a gusto en París, en Londres, en Berlín, Trump no oculta su incomodidad en ellas, y prefiere entenderse con los enemigos, como Putin o Kim Jong-un. Su foto, cruzado de brazos rodeado de los líderes europeos que le acosan, es elocuente. Podría incluso sostenerse que el actual presidente norteamericano representa los valores opuestos a los de su país, y que tenga problemas no ya con su partido, el republicano, sino con su equipo, del que lleva despedidos unos cuantos, lo corrobora. Sin embargo, le votaron y su índice de popularidad se mantiene. Algo debe de tener y quien se acerque a EE.UU. lo nota.
Los norteamericanos están enfadados y tienen razones para ello. Trabajan más que los europeos, ganan menos, su seguridad social es rudimentaria y las cargas cada vez mayores. Y vienen cargando con la seguridad no ya de Europa, sino del mundo, aunque esa seguridad explote en muchas ocasiones. Su presupuesto de Defensa equivale al de los doce países que le siguen. Están hartos y Trump ha sabido capitalizar esa frustración. Exigen más de los aliados, de los rivales, de todo el mundo, y es cuando nos damos cuenta de que no han votado a Trump. Han votado contra los demás. El problema es que su política contra todo y contra todos, desde el cambio climático a las tarifas arancelarias, puede conducirnos al desastre. Pues esas son guerras en las que no hay vencedores, sólo vencidos. Por lo que los europeos haríamos bien en tomarnos en serio a Trump, no como una aberración pasajera en la historia y la política norteamericana sino como la consecuencia lógica de haber llevado demasiado tiempo el peso de la púrpura mundial.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,