Reflecting on US Crackdown on Huawei

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 29 January 2020
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Liza Roberts. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
On Jan. 28, the British government decided to allow Huawei only limited participation in the construction of the United Kingdom’s 5G network. This decision prohibits Huawei from conducting business in sensitive areas such as nuclear energy and military affairs, and restricts Huawei’s market share in the 5G networking arena to 30%.

Generally speaking, this is a setback for the United States in its attempt to deter allied countries from using Huawei technologies. The U.K. is the most important U.S. ally in Europe. In order to persuade the U.K. to abandon use of Huawei equipment in constructing its 5G networks, one can say that Washington tried as hard as possible, including issuing a threat that this decision would impact the special relationship between the U.S. and the U.K.; that the U.S. may no longer share intelligence with the U.K., and that this decision could even affect economic and trade negotiations between the two countries. However, in the end, the U.K. decided to use Huawei while it simultaneously described the move as “limited participation” to mollify the U.S.

In doing so, the U.K. delivered two important messages: First, the 5G network truly cannot be built without Huawei. Huawei is an indispensable leader in 5G technology, so if the U.K. did not use Huawei equipment it would entail postponing the construction of the 5G network for two to three years. Additionally, the network that would be built would be slower and more expensive. The U.K. truly has no choice in this situation.

Second, the U.S. is really being unreasonable this time, making things difficult for a strong ally. Unlike the Cold War era, reliance on the U.S. for security means everything. As a representative U.S. ally, the U.K. has multiple interests and it needs freedom outside of its special relationship with the U.S. to manage them. Being forced to sacrifice its sovereignty and right to work with China in developing a 5G network for the sake of maintaining its special relationship with the U.S. is something London cannot accept. Maintaining a special balance between China and the U.S. is of the utmost benefit to Britain’s national interests.

Regarding the claim that Huawei poses a threat to information security in all countries, all of America’s allies know this is just a lie put forth by Washington. Countries are no more scared of Huawei today than they were when using Huawei equipment to construct 4G networks. These countries are actually outmaneuvering Washington with their ambiguity.

Every country wants to use Huawei, and by working with Huawei, the U.K. is surely allowing other European countries affected by this American complication to breathe a sigh of relief. The U.K. is a member of the Five Eyes alliance and holds the highest level of intelligence sharing authority with the U.S. Other European countries have good reasons to follow the British model when planning their own cooperation with Huawei. Washington cannot stop London, and it will be even harder to stop Berlin and Paris from using Huawei equipment.

Australia, the first country which refused to use Huawei because of the Trump administration’s directives, is likely to become isolated. It faces a huge risk that its 5G network will fall behind, thus dragging down comprehensive economic and social development.

The U.S. really should not have issues with Huawei, a high-tech company. It is only creating a problem for itself. Facing defeat in the U.K., Washington must reflect and refrain from making further mistakes by sticking to its own ways. The U.S. could completely alter its policy of opposing Huawei to one of expanded cooperation. Should the current policy remain in place, the U.S. will become the Western country that falls most behind in terms of 5G networks. While Huawei might lose sales, the U.S. would have a slow 5G network, and America’s losses would certainly be greater than China’s. This method of containing China is undoubtedly evil.

Hopefully, Washington will calm down and refrain from adopting more extreme measures to suppress Huawei. America is a global superpower and certainly has other means at its disposal to deal with this issue. However, its current attitude toward Huawei is already unpopular, making things difficult for itself. If the U.S. goes nuclear in attempting to stifle Huawei, it will inevitably bring about more chaos. The international system that places the U.S. at its center will be damaged. For the U.S., the loss certainly outweighs the gain.


英国政府28日做出决定,允许华为“有限参与”该国的5G网络建设。该决定禁止华为在核电和军事设施等敏感领域运营,其市场份额也将被限制在30%以内。

总的来看,这是美国试图在其盟国中阻止使用华为技术的重大挫折。英国是美国最重要的欧洲盟国。为劝说英国在5G网络建设中放弃使用华为设备,华盛顿可谓用尽了力气,包括威胁说这会影响美英特殊关系,美国可能不再向英国分享情报,甚至会影响两国接下来的经贸谈判,等等。但英国最终还是决定使用华为,同时用“有限使用”的说法安慰美国。

英国这样做传递出了两大信息:一是建设5G的确离不开华为。华为是5G网络技术不可取代的领导者,英国如果不用华为设备,意味着建设5G网络要推迟两到三年,而且建成的网络速度慢且费用高。英国事实上处于“没得选”境地。

二是美国这一次实在蛮不讲理,在强盟国之所难。而今天不像“冷战”时代那样,盟国对美国的安全依赖意味着一切。英国作为美国盟国的代表有着多重利益,它需要在美英特殊关系之外的那部分自由空间。为了维系英美特殊关系而牺牲与中国发展合作的主权权利,是伦敦无法接受的。在美中之间维持某种特殊的平衡,最有利于英国国家利益的最大化。

关于华为威胁各国信息安全的说法,美国的盟国都知道那是华盛顿编出来的谎言。各国今天对华为的担心并不高于它们为建设4G网络使用华为设备的时候。他们对美国说一些模棱两可的话,其实是在与华盛顿打太极拳。

各国都想使用华为,英国对华为“放水”想必会让正在头疼怎么把美国搪塞过去的其他欧洲国家松一口气。英国是“五眼联盟”国家,与美国的情报分享级别最高,其他欧洲国家就更有理由按照“英国模式”安排自己与华为的合作了。华盛顿挡不住伦敦,就更难挡住柏林和巴黎使用华为设备了。

最早用拒绝华为向特朗普政府递投名状的澳大利亚很可能将变得很孤独,它将面临5G网络落后并因此拖累综合经济社会发展的巨大风险。

美国真的不该与华为这家高科技公司过不去,它实际给自己出了一个大难题。面对在英国的失利,华盛顿有必要进行一次反思而非坚持错误,一条道走到黑。美国方面完全可以把与华为为敌的政策变成扩大与华为合作的政策。现行政策搞下去,美国将成为5G网络最落后的西方大国。华为少一些营收,美国却是整个5G慢了,美国的总损失将大于中国。这样“遏制中国”无疑是一条邪路。

希望华盛顿冷静下来,不要动采取更极端手段打压华为的念头。美国是超级大国,手里还有其他手段。但它现在这样对华为已经不得人心了,而且搞得自己也很难受。它如果拿出更多“核武器”级别的手段试图扼杀华为,势必带来更多混乱,损害的是他自己处在中心位置的国际体系。那对它来说更加得不偿失。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Spain: Trump to Students — ‘Don’t Come’

Australia: Donald Trump Is So Convinced of His Mandate that He Is Battling the Courts

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Topics

Hong Kong: From Harvard to West Point — The Underlying Logic of Trump’s Regulation of University Education

Spain: Trump to Students — ‘Don’t Come’

Japan: Will the Pressure on Harvard University Affect Overseas Students?

Mexico: From Star Wars to Golden Domes

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Austria: Trump’s Peace Is Far Away

Related Articles

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary