The outgoing Trump administration, Israel and Saudi Arabia are seeking to torpedo any chance for the new White House to negotiate with Tehran.
Opposition to Joe Biden by supporters of Donald Trump has started even before Biden’s presidency begins. We should interpret the tour by outgoing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in this light, a tour which led to a meeting in Saudi Arabia with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a secret summit widely publicized by Israeli media, although denied by the Riyadh government. A few days earlier, Trump had proposed that his military leadership consider an attack on Iran’s nuclear installations. And later, on Friday, the father of the Iranian atomic bomb project was assassinated in an attack some 90 kilometers from Tehran (approximately 56 miles), likely by the Israeli secret service.
All these steps are intended to derail Biden’s plans to resume negotiations with Iran. One of Trump’s most deplorable achievements was withdrawing the U.S. from the nuclear deal signed by Barack Obama in 2015, by which Tehran renounced the pursuit of nuclear weapons, submitted itself to controls by the International Atomic Energy Agency and began the process of rejoining the international community. This multilateral agreement advanced the policy against nuclear proliferation and was an example of the efficacy of diplomacy and sanctions, combined, in dealing with dangerous regimes.
The Iranian regime, outrageous in every respect, has opted for restraint, waiting for the new Democratic administration. It is in nobody’s interest to have either an Iranian regime isolated in the world and radicalized, or the brutal Saudi autocracy and its clandestine ally, the Israel of Netanyahu, who is worn out politically and under attack by his country’s legal system. Biden needs the support of the international community and the European Union in reversing course on the dangerous path of confrontation and restarting down another path, which, without naivety and with unwavering commitment to the security of the allies in the region, seeks through diplomacy to move Iran verifiably away from nuclear temptation.
Crisis iranà para Biden
La Administración saliente de Trump, Israel y Arabia Saudà buscan torpedear las posibilidades de negociación de la nueva Casa Blanca con Teherán
La oposición trumpista a Joe Biden ha empezado antes incluso de que haya comenzado su presidencia. Asà debe interpretarse la gira del secretario de Estado saliente, Mike Pompeo, que lo llevó a reunirse en Arabia Saudà con el prÃncipe heredero, Mohamed bin Salmán, y el primer ministro israelÃ, BenjamÃn Netanyahu, en una cumbre secreta de la que informaron abundantemente los medios israelÃes aunque el Gobierno de Riad la desmintiera. Pocos dÃas antes, Donald Trump habÃa propuesto a su cúpula militar la preparación de un ataque a las instalaciones nucleares de Irán. Y más tarde, el viernes, el padre de la proyectada bomba atómica iranÃ, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, caÃa asesinado en un atentado a unos 90 kilómetros de Teherán, presumiblemente a manos de los servicios secretos israelÃes.
Todos estos movimientos son intentos de hacer descarrilar los planes de Biden para reanudar las negociaciones con Irán. Uno de los más lamentables logros de Trump ha sido la suspensión del pacto nuclear firmado por Barack Obama en 2015 por el que Teherán renunciaba a perseguir el arma atómica, se sometÃa a estrictos controles de la Agencia Internacional de la EnergÃa Atómica e iniciaba su reincorporación a la comunidad internacional. Aquel acuerdo multilateral fue un salto hacia adelante en la polÃtica contra la proliferación nuclear y un ejemplo de la eficacia de la diplomacia y de las sanciones, combinadas en el trato con regÃmenes peligrosos.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.
Washington is no longer content with slow exhaustion; it has adopted a strategy of swift, symbolic strikes designed to recalibrate the international landscape.