The Last Thing Needed in Cross-Strait Relations: Mutual Hatred

Published in UDN
(Taiwan) on 31 January 2021
by Kun-Shuan Chiu (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
President Joe Biden has inherited a divided and delegitimized nation from Donald Trump. His greatest challenge, therefore, is restoring the order created and protected by the U.S.

First, regarding the national order, Biden must strive to control COVID-19, end the opposition between red states and blue states, moderate the trend toward extremism in both parties, rebuild trust in the democratic system and promote racial equality. Second, in the international order, he must maintain the systems and norms the U.S. established, promote multilateral diplomacy and restore the faith of allies and partners in the country.

America’s Indo-Pacific affairs, which are based on the Barack Obama-era plan to return to the Asia-Pacific region coordinated by Kurt Campbell, the assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs under the Obama administration. In a recent article, Campbell pointed out that, to restore order in the Indo-Pacific region, maintaining the legitimacy of the power balance and order is necessary, and the support of allies is indispensable. Although he advocates for a realistic balance of power, he disagrees that the Chinese Communist Party should be allowed to enjoy a scope of influence in the region comparable to its economic strength.

While the Biden administration still regards China as its toughest competitor, it is emphasizing coexistence and cooperation. The U.S. needs to strengthen its military deterrence and maintain its position of global leadership in military affairs, critical technology innovation, and research and development. In the context of regional balance, it must compete with China over issues such as the South China Sea, technology, Taiwan and the internet, yet at the same time cooperate with China in issues such as pandemic prevention, the environment, the economy and arms control. The familiar U.S.-China relationship is one that is contentious but unbroken; even if cooperation is another side to that relationship, it will not be entirely solid.

When balancing cross-strait policies, Biden will gradually return to America’s traditional one-China “policy” of encouraging cross-strait dialogue and reducing tension in the region. At the same time, the U.S. will maintain a strategically ambiguous position toward both sides of the strait, deterring the CCP from using force against Taiwan while making clear it does not support Taiwan’s independence. However, it will support Taiwan’s expansion on the international scene and its participation in international organizations that don’t require national sovereignty for membership.

The effectiveness of U.S. Indo-Pacific policy primarily depends on the distribution of power in the region. According to statistics by the International Monetary Fund, China’s gross domestic product in 2020 reached 70% of that of the U.S.; the gap between the two was unprecedentedly small. Geopolitical experts believe that just as the U.S. regards the Caribbean Sea as its own, so too will China seek to establish its scope of influence in the South China Sea.

After almost three years of tough constrictive measures under Trump, the CCP has become deeply aware of the urgency of becoming self-reliant and clearly understands its own bottom line and strength. With its 14th Five-Year Plan, the CCP will strive for innovation and autonomy in critical technologies. It will also make good use of its united front on the international stage. By leading in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and signing the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment, it will seek a cooperative platform that opposes trade protectionism, while establishing its scope of influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

America’s cross-strait policies have been reignited in a return to traditional American systems and values. This includes Biden’s recent ban on using the geographic location of COVID-19's origin to name the virus, in an effort to avoid inciting racial discrimination and fomenting xenophobia. Although this is a small change, it demonstrates inclusivity and greatness. A country proud of its institutions and values does not need to highlight its superiority by vilifying and being hateful to others.

Taiwan’s leaders should recognize that in the current international political situation, they need to enact balanced policies and be empathetic. Going along with the U.S. is a practical necessity, but they should not forget to engage China as well. What is most needed in Taiwan-China policy is improving the cross-strait climate and showing goodwill. As a first step, we can follow Biden’s ban on using discriminatory language and spreading propaganda about China. We can encourage multifaceted exchange between both sides of the strait and demonstrate our self-confidence. The last thing both sides need right now is mutual hate. Being enemies with China’s 1.4 billion people would be Taiwan’s greatest threat and tragedy.

The author is an emeritus professor at the National Chengchi University Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies.


星期透視/兩岸最不需要的就是相互仇視

美國總統拜登從川普手上接收了一個既分裂又失格的國家,他上任後最大挑戰是恢復美國建立與捍衛的秩序(order)。

首先是國內秩序,拜登要努力控制冠狀病毒疫情、消弭紅州與藍州的對立、緩和兩黨極端化的趨勢、重建對民主制度的信心、促進種族平等。其次是國際秩序,維護美國所建立的制度與規範,推動多邊主義外交,恢復盟邦與夥伴對美國的信心。

美國的印太事務則是由歐巴馬時期「重返亞太」的規畫與執行者坎伯(Kurt Capmbell)負責協調,他最近撰文指出在印太地區重建秩序,需要維持權力平衡與秩序的合法性,盟邦對此的支持則成為不可或缺。雖然他主張現實主義的權力平衡,但是他不同意在此主義下,讓中共在印太地區享有與其經濟實力相當的勢力範圍。

拜登政府仍將中國大陸視為最嚴峻的競爭對手,但是強調競爭下的共存與合作。美國必須加強自身的威懾能力,維持在軍事事務、關鍵技術創新和研發的全球領導地位,在區域平衡下與中國大陸競爭,包括南海、科技、台灣,與網路。同時與中國大陸在防疫、氣候、經濟、武器管控等議題合作。雙方關係進入大家熟悉的鬥而不破,雙方關係的另一個面向,是即使有合作,也會是合而不固。

在兩岸平衡政策下,拜登將逐漸回到美國傳統的一個中國「政策」,鼓勵兩岸對話、降低緊張。同時在兩岸保持戰略模糊的立場,嚇阻中共對台用武,同時表明不支持台灣獨立,但支持台灣擴大國際活動空間,加入不以國家主權為單位的國際組織。

美國印太政策的成效,主要取決於此區域的權力分配情況,據國際貨幣基金統計,二○二○年中國大陸國內生產總值已達美國的百分之七十,差距之小前所未有;地緣政治學者認為就如美國將加勒比海視為內海一般,中國大陸也將尋求在南海建立其勢力範圍。

中共在歷經川普近三年強硬遏制下,已經深刻意識自力更生的迫切,也清楚理解自己的底線與底氣。中共將透過「十四五規劃」,在關鍵科技上尋求創新與自主,在國際上則善用統一戰線,藉著主導「區域全面經濟夥伴協定」及簽署「中歐投資協定」,尋求反對貿易保護主義的合作平台,同時在印太建立勢力範圍。

美國的兩岸政策已重開機,回歸美國傳統制度與價值,包括最近拜登下令禁止「以病毒起源的地理位置」稱呼新冠肺炎,避免引起種族歧視與助長仇外情緒。雖是小小的改變,卻展現了包容與偉大,一個以自己制度與價值為傲的國家,就不需要以詆毀與仇視對方的方式,來凸顯自己的優越。

我國領導者應認清當前國際政治本質,要推行平衡的政策與具備同理心的胸懷,追隨美國是現實需要,但不要忘了經營中國大陸。當前大陸政策最需要的,是改善兩岸氛圍與展現善意;作為第一步,可以仿效拜登總統下令禁止對大陸使用歧視性語言與宣傳,鼓勵兩岸多面向交流,展現我們的自信心。現在兩岸最不需要的是相互仇視,如果與大陸十四億人民為敵,那才是我們最大的威脅與悲劇。

(作者為政治大學東亞所名譽教授)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Australia: Trump’s Tariffs Were Already Ever-Changing. Now, Court Fights Add to the Uncertainty

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Austria: Trump’s Peace Is Far Away

Topics

Spain: Trump to Students — ‘Don’t Come’

Japan: Will the Pressure on Harvard University Affect Overseas Students?

Mexico: From Star Wars to Golden Domes

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Austria: Trump’s Peace Is Far Away

Austria: Trump’s Solo Dream Is Over

Related Articles

Australia: The US’s Biggest Export? Trump’s MAGA Mindset

Taiwan: 2 Terms Won’t Satisfy Trump

Mexico: Trump and His Pyrrhic Victories

Canada: Trump Prioritizes Commerce over Shared Values in Foreign Policy Gamble