History Cannot Go Backward: US-China Relations Must Turn a New Page

Published in UDN
(Taiwan) on 9 February 2021
by Ching Chang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
With Joe Biden taking control of the U.S. government, new people and policies have brought about many changes. Within the first 10 days, in fact, he used executive orders to cancel many of the Donald Trump administration’s programs and reestablish administrative systems that were set up under former President Barack Obama but forcefully abolished by Trump.

Still, both in the U.S. and abroad, many international political observers and media commentators continue to base their views on the impact created by policies implemented when Trump was in charge. In particular, the tough actions taken to deal strongly with Beijing are widely believed to have rippling repercussions. Trump’s influence certainly cannot be done away with by adjusting policies. Ultimately, most people have come to the pessimistic conclusion, “Relations between Washington and Beijing can never return to what they once were!”

Certainly, this viewpoint sounds reasonable. However, when it is examined closely, there are errors in the logic and fallacy in the thinking. Unfortunately, almost all media and online groups have jumped to accept this viewpoint without question. Echoed by their followers, these kinds of views have become mainstream, so that now, no one can feel optimistic about future interactions between Beijing and Washington. Some people even sense an impending storm but don’t know what drama will unfold.

History, in fact, has always been dynamically developing, and objective circumstances and actual conditions constantly change; history cannot stop and linger at any one point. Similarly, hoping that any interactions between international societies return to a previous state is entirely unrealistic.

First of all, those in charge on the political stage are constantly changing. Even if a previous cast of characters makes a comeback, they cannot turn back history to a previous time. Because the objective conditions change the situation, no matter how strong the subjective desires of those in charge, they cannot affect great change through desire alone. All things change according to their own will.

In fact, when you observe the political teams of any country, from when they first come to power all the way until they hand it over to the next team, all of the policies are dynamically shifting. After all, people are alive and the world is constantly turning. Thus, no matter whether circumstances are favorable or adverse, as long as history progresses, no one can return to the past. This is life’s cruelest fact.

The relationship between the U.S. and China will inevitably follow this type of historical rule. No matter how the ruling party on either side changes, the relationship between the two cannot return to what it once was. This doesn’t mean, however, that relations will deteriorate, nor does it mean they will improve. The conflict between Beijing and Washington is certainly not like replaying a single scene over and over again. Whether we like it or not, we must turn to a new page in history, and both sides need to begin a new chapter.

In the face of change, no matter what tactics the other party uses, even if they intend to cling to old ideas, the entire situation will dynamically develop and continue moving forward. Why can some countries take advantage of new situations to come up with good plans for governance, while other regimes are left behind by history and knocked out of the competition by reality? In fact, it is due to the ability to accurately perceive in which direction the times are changing, instead of clinging obstinately to old habits and creeds and preferring to preserve old ways instead of being willing to face reality.

History cannot go backward. Similarly, history waits kindly for no one. The opportunity to act is now. If both sides rely on using political rhetoric to address cross-strait relations, acknowledging historical facts yet being unwilling to calmly accept the political foundation both sides originally built — that will be the real reason the relationship between China and the U.S. cannot be as it once was! Moreover, even if both sides are now willing to humble themselves, their respective strength ebbs and flows. Assuming they even want their relationship to be what it once was, unfortunately, that is now an unrealistic expectation!


歷史不可回復 美中關係必會翻至新頁面

拜登接掌美國政府,新人新政諸多變化,誠然在初期10日內,透過直接發布總統行政指示命令,取消川普政府多項正在執行政務項目,同時亦恢復歐巴馬總統主政時期所建立,但卻遭川普所強行廢止之行政體制。

但是國內外多位國際政治觀察家或是媒體評論者,不斷地依據川普當家期間內所曾執行政策產生之衝擊,特別是強勢對付北京所採取之強勢作為,普遍認定必然是餘波盪漾,川普所造成影響勢必無法透過政策調整加以消弭,最後多半都是總結出「華盛頓與北京關係是回不去了!」之悲觀看法。

誠然如此看法聽起來是相當有道理,但若是仔細一想,其實這種結論確實存在著邏輯上之訛誤,同時在思維上亦是個謬。但很不幸地是幾乎所有媒體與網路社群,都不假思索地照單全收,並且扈從附和此等觀點之態勢,儼然讓此說法成為主流觀點,讓各方對於北京與華盛頓未來互動,都無法感到樂觀,甚至還覺得山雨欲來風滿樓,不知道未來還有何種好戲將會登場。

其實歷史本來就是不斷動態發展,客觀環境與現實條件亦是經常變化;歷史不可能停滯與駐留在任何節點,同樣若是希冀任何國際社會互動關係能回到從前,亦將是完全不切實際之奢望。

先不要說政治舞台上當家作主者不斷替換,就算是原班人馬捲土重來,亦不可能讓歷史回到從前,因為客觀情勢確實會產生變化,所以不論當家者本身主觀意願多強,亦不可能透過喊叫讓海水結凍,天地萬物順其意志產生扭轉變化。

其實觀察任何國家政治團隊,在其主政初期直到最後經過人事更替交班給另個團隊,所有政策亦是在動態變化,畢竟人是活生生地存在,而且這個世界也是不斷翻騰變化,所以不論是順境抑或是逆境,只要是走過歷史,沒有任何人可以回到過去,這是人生中最殘酷之事實。

美國與中國大陸相互關係必然是要遵循此等歷史法則,不論任一方政壇領導團隊如何變化,雙方關係必然都是回不去了,但是回不去從前,未見得是會更惡化,亦未見得是會有所改善。北京與華盛頓相互過招,絕對不會像是走馬燈,輪轉來去還會出現同樣圖案那個頁面,不論吾人喜不喜歡,必然是要翻到歷史新頁面,雙方必然要開啟新篇章。

就算面對世事變化,不管對方使出千條計,心中打算固守那個老主意,整體情勢來是會動態發展繼續前進。所以為何有些國家能夠因勢利導再創佳猷,而有些政權卻會被歷史所拋棄,被現實所淘汰,其實完全就因能否正確地看出時勢轉變方向,還是依然故我死守著教條不放,寧可抱殘守缺就是不願面對現實。

歷史不可回復,同樣歷史亦不會善意等待任何人,過了這個村,不一定還有那個店。靠著玩弄政治話術處理兩岸關係,嘴上講著承認歷史事實,但又不願意坦然接受當初雙方所建立之政治基礎,那個才是雙方關係回不去真正原因所在啊!而且就算現在願意讓唾面自乾,其實雙方實力消長,想要回到從前恐怕亦早就是奢望囉!

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The Deal for Kyiv Is Better Than the Many Threats against It

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Topics

Austria: The Deal for Kyiv Is Better Than the Many Threats against It

Austria: Trump’s Film Tariffs Hurt Hollywood

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Related Articles

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China