Submarine Sales: France Condemns Australia’s Withdrawal

214

September 17, 2021

Published in La Croix
(France) on 16 September 2021
by La Croix (link to original link to original)

Translated from by Hal Swindall. Edited by Michelle Bisson.

Australia has angered France by tearing up a 2019 supply contract for 12 attack submarines with a surprise agreement Sept. 16 for the delivery of American nuclear submarines.

In what French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian called a "stab in the back," he deplored the Tuesday, Sept. 16 Australian decision to renege on its contract to buy 12 attack submarines from France.

"We had built a trusting relationship. Now that trust has been betrayed," Le Drian added. "Such a unilateral, brutal and unforeseeable decision strongly recalls [Donald] Trump," added the minister, who concluded this "deal of the century" while he was defense minister.

L’Australie a mis la France en colère après avoir déchiré un contrat de fourniture de douze sous-marins d’attaque, signé en 2019, au profit d’un partenariat surprise conclu jeudi 16 septembre avec les États-Unis et comprenant la livraison de sous-marins nucléaires.

Un « coup dans le dos ». Par la voix de son ministre des affaires étrangères Jean-Yves Le Drian, la France a déploré jeudi 16 septembre la décision de l’Australie de revenir sur le contrat de fourniture de douze sous-marins d’attaque.

« Nous avions établi avec l’Australie une relation de confiance. Cette confiance est trahie », a ajouté le ministre. « Cette décision unilatérale, brutale, imprévisible, ressemble beaucoup à ce que faisait M. Trump », a lancé Jean-Yves Le Drian, qui avait conclu le « contrat du siècle » sur les sous-marins lorsqu’il était ministre de la défense.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Block title

Germany: Trump’s Coup against Maduro Violates International Law

January 5, 2026. Published in Frankfurter Rundschau

Leaders on Cuba and Nicaragua, Miguel Díaz-Canel and Daniel Ortega, should be especially worried.

Canada: Good Riddance to Maduro but What Next?

January 3, 2026. Published in Toronto Sun

Philippines: The (Mis)fortunes of International Law

January 4, 2026. Published in The Manila Times

Whatever pragmatic considerations may have prompted Trump to make the move, there is no justification in international law for it.

Canada: Good Riddance, Nicolas Maduro

January 3, 2026. Published in National Post

Egypt: Reasserting Hegemony: America’s New Approach to Global Confrontation

January 4, 2026. Published in Ahram Online

Washington is no longer content with slow exhaustion; it has adopted a strategy of swift, symbolic strikes designed to recalibrate the international landscape.

Topics

South Africa: Venezuela Will Once Again Expose Flaws in UN Security Council

January 10, 2026. Published in Cape Times

Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.

Saudi Arabia: Venezuela: Blunt Reality…With No Pretexts or Excuses

January 10, 2026. Published in Asharq Al-Awsat

We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.

Poland: Boguslaw Chrabota: Mar-a-Lago Meeting Strengthens Ukraine and the West

January 10, 2026. Published in Rzeczpospolita

[I]t can be said that the West — thanks to Trump, because he is the leader of the process and the host of meetings — is consolidating.

Saudi Arabia: From Saddam to Maduro

January 10, 2026. Published in Arab News

Defiant leaders would do well to learn from what happened in Caracas — be careful, Trump is in search of victories.

Kenya: US Onslaught on Venezuela Targets Its Large Oil Resources

January 7, 2026. Published in The Standard

Saudi Arabia: Arab World’s Clear Warning from Venezuela

January 7, 2026. Published in Arab News

The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.