Biden’s Remarks: Make Good on Promise To Defend Taiwan

Published in Sankei Shimbun
(Japan) on 21 September 2022
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dorothy Phoenix. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
On Sept. 18, U.S. President Joe Biden declared on a U.S. television program that if the Chinese military invades Taiwan, the U.S. military will defend Taiwan.

During a visit to Japan in May, Biden also reiterated this view several times, in regard to U.S. military involvement during a military crisis in Taiwan.

In relation to Biden’s series of remarks, for successive administrations the U.S. government, taking heed of opposition from China, has normally explained that there has been “no change” to its policy toward the Taiwan crisis, including its approach of “strategic ambiguity.”

Even now, the U.S. government indicates the same stance, but the difference is that Kurt Campbell, the Biden administration’s coordinator for Indo-Pacific Affairs, confirmed that Biden’s remarks “speak for themselves,” and China is now confronted with the administration’s general consensus to mobilize troops.

China was “strongly dissatisfied” with the remarks, claiming that they “severely violate the commitment the U.S. made not to support Taiwan independence.”

But successive U.S. administrations have aimed for peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. All China has to do is not brandish its military power and engage in reckless actions to change the status quo. China ought to stop its military coercion, which intensified after U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan.

In order to suppress China’s military ventures toward Taiwan, it is essential for the U.S. to show a stance of keeping its promise to defend Taiwan and strengthen its deterrence ability, without shying away from China’s threats.

On Sept. 2, the Biden administration agreed to a sale of up to $1.1 billion (about 150 billion yen) worth of anti-ship missiles known as Harpoons, as well as other weapons, to Taiwan. So far, this is the fifth time this year that the U.S. has provided weapons to Taiwan. We should welcome this trend. Shouldn’t Japan also keep pace with the U.S. and strengthen its efforts toward the Taiwan crisis?

At the same time, the U.S. Congress is deliberating a bill called the Taiwan Policy Act, which aims to strengthen U.S.-Taiwan relations. The bill includes $6.5 billion (about 930 billion yen) of aid to strengthen Taiwan’s defenses over the course of five years. Additionally, it treats Taiwan as a “major non-NATO ally” and “promote[s] Taiwan's meaningful participation in important international organizations.”

Within the Biden administration, there were some who voiced disapproval of clauses that ran afoul of the U.S. One-China policy, but we hope that Biden will declare his support for the bill and approve it as proof of his intentions for a strong defense of Taiwan.


バイデン氏の発言 台湾の防衛へ有言実行を

バイデン米大統領は18日、米テレビ番組で、中国が台湾を軍事侵攻した際は米軍が台湾を守ると明言した。

バイデン氏は5月に訪日した際も台湾有事における米軍の軍事的関与を明言するなど、再三、再四にわたって同様の考えを示してきた。

一連のバイデン氏の発言に関し、米政府は中国の反発を念頭に、台湾有事の対応で歴代政権がとる「戦略的曖昧さ」を含む台湾政策に「変更はない」と説明するのが常態化している。

今回も米政府は同じ立場を示したが、従来と違ったのは、バイデン政権のインド太平洋政策を統括するキャンベル調整官が、バイデン氏の発言は「自明の理だ」と追認し、米軍出動は政権の総意であると中国に突きつけたことだ。

中国は「米国は『台湾独立』を支持しないという重要な約束に深刻に違反した」と反発し、「強烈な不満」を表明した。

だが、歴代米政権が目指すのは台湾海峡の平和と安定だ。中国が軍事力を振りかざし、現状変更を図る暴挙に出なければよいだけの話だ。中国こそ、ペロシ下院議長の訪台を受けて先鋭化させている軍事的威圧をやめるべきだ。

中国による台湾への軍事的冒険主義を押さえ込むには、中国の恫喝(どうかつ)に臆することなく、台湾防衛へ有言実行の態度を示し、抑止力を高めていくことが肝要だ。

バイデン政権は今月2日、対艦ミサイル「ハープーン」など総額11億ドル(約1500億円)規模に上る武器の台湾への売却を承認した。米国からの武器供与は今年に入り5回目となる。歓迎すべき動きだ。日本も米国と歩調を合わせ、台湾有事への取り組みを強化させるべきだろう。

一方、米議会では、米台関係の強化に向けた「台湾政策法案」の審議が行われている。法案は、台湾の防衛強化に5年間で65億ドル(約9300億円)を支援するほか、「台湾を北大西洋条約機構(NATO)非加盟の主要な同盟国と同等に扱う」「台湾の国際機関への加盟を支持する」といった内容が盛り込まれている。

バイデン政権の内部では、一部の条項が米国の「一つの中国」政策に抵触しかねないとして法案に難色を示す声があるが、バイデン氏には、台湾防衛への強固な意思の証(あかし)として、法案への支持を表明し、成立を後押ししてほしい。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

South Korea: Why Is the ‘Queen of Stocks’ Stepping Down? The Pelosi Index and the PELOSI Act

Pakistan: Trump’s Relentless War on Cartels

Poland: Ending the US Government Shutdown Could Lead Democrats to Victory

India: Trump-Mamdani Meet: Temporary Truce or Political Theatre?

Palestine: The American Delegation and Managing the Ceasefire’s Repercussions

Topics

Cuba: Life in Venezuela Has Not Stopped

India: A Tenuous Truce: Can the Updated US-Ukraine Peace Plan Actually End the War?

South Africa: How Revoking Naledi Pandor’s US Visa Was Engineered

Saudi Arabia: A Tale of Two ‘Virtual’ Ceasefires

Palestine: Peace: Rest in Peace

Iraq: The Anxious America: When Fear Becomes a Component of Political Awareness

Austria: Trump’s Double Failures

Spain: Marco Rubio: Semiotics of the ‘Bully’

Related Articles

Hong Kong: US Military Uses, Taiwan Pays the Bill: America Won’t Stop until It Squeezes Taiwan Dry

India: Arms Sale to Taiwan Deepens US-China Friction as Military Drills Intensify

Saudi Arabia: First US-UN Plan for Palestine Raises Hopes of Peace

Indonesia: ASEAN Will Struggle To Escape US-China Squeeze

Singapore: China Does Just Enough To Support Russia, Same as the West Does for Ukraine