The Cold War over TikTok Videos

Published in Der Standard
(Austria) on 24 March 2023
by Eric Frey (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Mallory Matsumoto<i>US policy’s fight against the popular platform is an absurd response to the challenge from China.</i> An intense war may be raging in Ukraine, but China remains the greatest enemy in Washington. And its most dangerous weapon is 30-second-long dance videos. At least, this is the impression given by Congressional representatives from both parties during an hours-long hearing of TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, who was interrogated like a war criminal on Thursday. Loyalty to Beijing, data theft, spying, destruction of American youth—the reserved manager from Singapore was accused of everything. That it was the Chinese government, rather than the private parent company ByteDance, who ruled out the sale of TikTok hours before the hearing only increased mistrust surrounding ByteDance’s independence. Whether Beijing could in fact access strategically valuable information through the popular video platform is hardly relevant here anymore. TikTok has become a symbol of the new Cold War between the U.S. and China. But the representation of this fight has just as much substance of a typical TikTok video. China is not as powerful as some claim, nor is there any apparent masterplan for global supremacy. The authoritarian President Xi Jinping is a problem primarily for his people who are stripped of increasingly more freedoms, including use of Western internet services. The demonization of TikTok is the most absurd answer to the challenge from China.. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
The U.S. policy battle against the popular platform is an absurd response to the challenge from China.

An intense war may be raging in Ukraine, but China remains Washington’s greatest enemy. And the enemy’s most dangerous weapon consists of 30-second dance videos. At least, that’s the impression members of Congress from both parties gave during an hours-long hearing with TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, who was interrogated like a war criminal on Thursday. Loyalty to Beijing, data theft, spying, destruction of American youth —the reserved manager from Singapore was accused of everything. The fact that it was the Chinese government rather than the private parent company ByteDance who ruled out selling TikTok hours before the hearing only increased mistrust surrounding ByteDance’s independence.

Whether Beijing can, in fact, access strategically valuable information through the popular video platform is hardly relevant here anymore. TikTok has become a symbol of the new Cold War between the U.S. and China.

But the way this fight is portrayed has just as much substance of a typical TikTok video. China is not as powerful as some claim, nor is there any apparent master plan for global supremacy. The authoritarian President Xi Jinping is a problem primarily for his people who are stripped of increasingly more freedoms, including the use of Western internet services. The demonization of TikTok is the most absurd answer to the challenge from China.


Der kalte Krieg um Tiktok-Videos
Der Kampf der US-Politik gegen die populäre Plattform ist eine absurde Antwort auf die chinesische Herausforderung

In der Ukraine mag ein heißer Krieg toben, aber in Washington gilt China immer noch als größter Feind. Und dessen gefährlichste Waffe sind 30 Sekunden lange Tanzvideos. Diesen Eindruck erweckten zumindest Kongressabgeordnete aus beiden Parteien bei der stundenlangen Befragung von Tiktok-Chef Shou Chew, der am Donnerstag wie ein Kriegsverbrecher verhört wurde. Gehorsam gegenüber Peking, Datenklau, Spionage, das Verderben der amerikanischen Jugend – alles wurde dem zurückhaltenden Manager aus Singapur vorgeworfen. Dass es die chinesische Regierung war, die Stunden vor dem Hearing den Verkauf von Tiktok ausschloss, nicht der private Mutterkonzern Bytedance, hat das Misstrauen im Bezug auf dessen Unabhängigkeit noch verstärkt.
Ob Peking über die populäre Videoplattform tatsächlich an strategisch wertvolle Informationen herankommen könnte, spielt hier kaum noch eine Rolle. Tiktok ist zum Symbol des neuen kalten Krieges zwischen den USA und China geworden.
Aber die Darstellung dieses Kampfes hat so viel Substanz wie ein typisches Tiktok-Video. Weder ist China so mächtig, wie manche behaupten, noch lässt sich ein Masterplan für die globale Vorherrschaft erkennen. Der autoritäre Präsident Xi Jinping ist vor allem für sein Volk ein Problem, dem immer mehr Freiheiten genommen werden, darunter die Nutzung westlicher Onlinedienste. Die Dämonisierung von Tiktok ist die absurdeste Antwort auf die chinesische Herausforderung. (Eric Frey, 24.3.2023)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Poland: Ukraine Is Still Far from Peace. What Was Actually Decided at the White House?

Pakistan: Trump’s Gaza Blueprint Unfolds

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Australia: Australia Boosts Corporate Law Enforcement as America Goes Soft

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands

Zimbabwe: What the West Doesn’t Understand about China’s Growing Military Might

Sri Lanka: Trump Is Very Hard on India and Brazil, but For Very Different Reasons