Overcome the Obstacles and There’s Considerable Room for US-China Cooperation in Lunar Exploration

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 20 June 2024
by Baoxin Zhang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kylie Kennelly. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
The Chang’e 6 lunar mission successfully collected samples from the dark side of the moon and is returning from its business trip with an expected landing on June 25. Many nations are greeting this development with great attention and approval. Even NASA Administrator Bill Nelson has changed his tune and sent his congratulations to China, remarking on how the U.S. and China have productively collaborated in exploring Mars, among other efforts, noting that both parties have many opportunities to overcome conflict and be partners, and welcoming increased space dialogue and cooperation with China.

As the world’s two largest economies, China and the U.S. both regard space exploration as a key strategic deployment for national development. Since establishing relations in 1979, China and the United States have passed through several phases of cooperation regarding space in recent decades, from a partnership in launching commercial satellites to send American satellites into space to the joint creation of a space exploration working group for the earth and space sciences, and again to creating way for the two governments to engage in a civil space dialogue. The U.S. has prompted agencies in the two countries to establish an orbital data exchange program between China and America’s Mars probes, guaranteeing that Mars exploration missions in both countries can operate smoothly in the future. Overall, China and the U.S. have maintained a relatively high level of enthusiasm for partnering in civil and commercial space travel and scientific research.

However, the deeply entrenched consequences of Cold War ideology has caused American policy to be one of avoidance, even closed-off and adversarial with respect to Chinese space exploration, impeding China-U.S. space cooperation at every turn. In a 1999 Cox Report, the U.S. House of Representatives groundlessly accused China of stealing America’s missile technology through its commercial launches, thereby “endangering U.S. national security.” In 2011, America further hindered China-U.S. space cooperation by releasing the “Wolf Amendment,” which prohibits NASA from using any federal funding for bilateral partnerships or exchanges with the Chinese government or Chinese state-owned enterprises, including scientific research projects, conferences, visits, etc. NASA faced backlash at one point in 2013 from American researchers when it banned Chinese scientists from attending academic conferences. American scholars felt this kind of targeted discrimination was an entirely unfortunate political issue that damaged ties between Chinese and American researchers.

Realistically speaking, America’s efforts to isolate China have failed. Chang’e 6 carried international payloads from the European Space Agency, France, Pakistan and other countries, all of which participated in collaborative scientific research with China. The China National Space Administration released guidelines last October for distributing Chang’e 5’s lunar samples and announced opportunities to collaborate on the Chang’e 8 mission. A mere month after China’s invitation to all scientific researchers, including Americans, NASA lobbied Congress to allow researchers to bypass the “Wolf Amendment” and apply for China’s lunar soil research program. NASA asserted that analyzing these lunar samples could lead to new scientific insights about the moon’s geological history that would inform future lunar exploration plans. It is evident that domestically, America clearly recognizes the value of Chinese-U.S. space collaboration and has expectations to resume that work. All that stands in the way is the self-imposed stumbling block American politicians continue to impose and use to wall themselves off from the wide expanse of opportunity to collaborate on space exploration.

If the U.S. would eliminate the policies and legal restrictions, including the “Wolf Amendment,” and actively pursue collaboration with China, it would not only directly promote the technological progress of human lunar and deep-space exploration, but it would also accelerate global scientific research collaboration for the good of humanity in several ways. First, as leading nations in aerospace development, China-U.S. collaboration would bring together the world’s top talents, technologies and resources. This would dramatically increase the speed of lunar soil analysis and research, thereby catalyzing a profound understanding of the history and evolution of the moon, Earth, and even the solar system. Second, scientific research collaboration would facilitate the exchange and innovation in both countries when it comes to acquiring and analyzing samples and enhance the development of more efficient and precise tools, the spillover effects of which would benefit medicine and material science, among other fields. Third, China-U.S. collaboration in the field of space could set an example for the international community by showing the prospect of having two great nations meet each other halfway, especially in the context of our increasingly complex global environment. And last, the breakthrough results of bilateral collaboration could ignite global public interest in space exploration, especially among the youth. This would encourage more young adults to invest in studying science, technology, and engineering, among other fields, and pledge their talent to pursuing the dreams of humanity.

The author is the planning director of the China Aerospace Industry Imaging Center.


日前,嫦娥六号探测器已在月背成功完成月球样品采集,如今已在“出差”的返程途中,预计25日降落,一系列进展得到多国高度关注与积极评价。美国国家航空航天局(NASA)局长纳尔逊也一改此前态度,对中方表示祝贺,并称美中之间在包括火星探测等领域开展了良好合作,双方有许多消除冲突、进行合作的机会,对同中国增加太空对话与合作表示欢迎。

日前,嫦娥六号探测器已在月背成功完成月球样品采集,如今已在“出差”的返程途中,预计25日降落,一系列进展得到多国高度关注与积极评价。美国国家航空航天局(NASA)局长纳尔逊也一改此前态度,对中方表示祝贺,并称美中之间在包括火星探测等领域开展了良好合作,双方有许多消除冲突、进行合作的机会,对同中国增加太空对话与合作表示欢迎。

然而,受根深蒂固的冷战思维影响,美国政界对中国航天抱持回避甚至封锁和敌对的态度,让中美航天合作处处受到掣肘。1999年,在《考克斯报告》中,美众议院无端指责中国通过商业发射窃取美国导弹技术,进而“危害美国国家安全”;2011年,美国出台“沃尔夫条款”,禁止NASA使用任何联邦资金与中国政府或中国国有企业进行双边合作与交流,包括科研项目、会议、访问等,为阻碍中美航天合作进一步“加码”。同中国任何形式的合作,NASA都必须首先获得美国国会批准,严重影响了中美科学家在航天科学、技术交流以及联合研究项目上的潜在合作机会,在美国科学界内部也饱受批判。2013年时NASA曾因禁止中国科学家参加学术会议而遭到美国科研人员的强烈抵制,美方学者认为这种“针对性歧视”损害了中美科研人员间的联系,完全是“不幸的政治问题”。

事实上,美国试图“孤立”中国的举动并不成功。嫦娥六号上搭载了包括欧洲空间局(ESA)、法国、意大利、巴基斯坦等国的国际载荷,一同参与中方的科研合作。去年10月,在中国国家航天局公布了嫦娥五号月球样品分发指南以及嫦娥八号任务合作机遇公告,对包括美国在内的各国科研人士申请合作表示欢迎后仅一个月,NASA便游说美国国会,允许研究人员绕过“沃尔夫条款”,向中国提出了月壤研究申请。而在嫦娥五号月球样本国际借用申请第一次会议审查会议上,总计10位申请者中有5位来自美国。据NASA表示,分析这些月球样本可能会为月球的地质历史带来新的科学见解,并为其未来的月球探索计划提供参考。可见,美国国内对中美航天合作的价值有清醒认知,对重启与中国进行太空探索合作也有一定期待,唯一的阻碍就是美政客放不下的“绊脚石”,筑起高墙把自己拦在了前景广阔的航天合作大门之外。

假如美方能够取消“沃尔夫条款”等一系列政策与法规限制,积极与中方展开合作,不仅能够直接推动人类月球及深空探索领域的科技进步,还能在多个维度上加速全球科研合作、增进人类福祉。首先,作为航天科技强国,中美开展合作将汇集全球顶尖人才、技术和资源,极大加快对月壤的分析和研究速度,促进人类形成对月球、地球乃至太阳系历史和演化的深刻认识。其次,科研合作有助于双方在航天采样、样本分析等方面的交流与创新,从而研发出更高效、精准的科研工具,其外溢效应将惠及医学、材料科学等领域。再次,中美在太空领域的合作还将为国际社会树立合作典范,尤其是在当前全球环境日益复杂的背景下,展现两个大国相向而行的可能性与前景。最后,双方合作产出的突破性成果能够激发全球公众特别是青少年对太空探索的兴趣,鼓励更多青年人才投身到科学、技术、工程等领域,为人类的逐梦星海储备人才。(作者是中国航空工业影像中心策划总监)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Topics

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem