The Tea Party’s Pockets Are Full

Published in Le Figaro
(France) on 20 November 2011
by Jean-Sébastien Stehli l (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Tabitha Middleton . Edited by Jessica Boesl.
Tea party members know full well how declare themselves against lobbies and special interests in Washington, but refusing funding from these same lobbies is another story. It's Tartuffe all over again. A study by the Center for Responsive Politics and iWatch News on 15 tea party members elected in November of 2010 reveals some interesting things.

The study conducted by these two organizations reveals that, in fact, the newly elected tea party-endorsed members are connected to the same lobbies as the Republicans they were witch-hunting. The 15 newly elected Congress members received a modest sum of $3.5 million during the first nine months of this year alone. In total, 700 PACs (Political Action Committees) connected to different Republican pet causes contributed to populist funds. Do as I say, not as I do; it’s a proven formula.

"The lobbyists and other traditional Washington powers know that the newbies will learn fast that they need them, and their rolodexes,” noted Mary Boyle of Common Cause, a group that defends good democratic practice.

The five PACs heading the donations:

-Honeywell International, a Fortune 500 company in the defense sector: 52 donations.
-The American Bankers Association: 31 donations.
-Lockheed Martin, in the defense sector: 30 donations.
-Koch Industries, a company owned by the two Koch brothers, tea party financiers: 29 donations.
-The National Association of Realtors, which represents the real-estate sector: 29 donations.

The 15 Congress members have also accepted PAC donations affiliated with groups supporting conservative causes such as the Freedom Project, which has close ties to Speaker of the House John Boehner. Those who intend to change Washington are quickly realizing that they need a lot of money if they're going to be re-elected. This is just the system they claimed to want to change. Good principles only last as long as it takes to get elected.


Le Tea Party: plein les poches...

Proclamer être contre les lobbies et les intérêts particuliers à Washington est une chose que les membres du Tea Party savent très bien faire. Mais refuser les fonds de ces mêmes lobbies est une autre affaire. C'est toujours l'histoire de Tartuffe. Une étude du Center for Responsive Politics et de iWatch News sur les 15 nouveaux membres du Tea Party élus en novembre 2010 révèle des choses intéressantes.

L'étude menée par ces deux organismes révèle en effet que les nouveaux élus du Tea Party sont liés aux mêmes lobbies que les Républicains qu'ils pourchassaient de leur vindicte. Les 15 nouveaux ont reçu la modeste somme de 3,5 millions de dollars rien que pendant les neuf premiers mois de cette année. Au total, 700 PACs (Political Action Committee), liés à différentes causes chères aux Républicains ont alimenté la cagnotte des populistes. Faites ce que je dis, pas ce que je fais. La recette est éprouvée.
"Les lobbies et les groupes représentants des intérêts spéciaux savent que les nouveaux élus auront besoin de leur argent et de leurs connections," note Mary Boyle, de Common Cause, un groupe qui défend les bonnes pratiques démocratiques.
Les cinq PACs en tête des donations:
- Honeywell International, une entreprise du Fortune 100, dans le secteur de la défense. 52 donations.
- The American Bankers Association, 31 donations.
- Lockheed Martin, dans le secteur de la défense. 30 donations.
- Koch Industries, entreprise des deux frères Koch, financiers du Tea Party. 29 donations.
- The National Association of Realtors, qui représente le secteur de l'immobilier. 29 donations.
Les 15 ont également accepté des dons de PACs affiliés à des groupes soutenant la cause des conservateurs, comme le Freedom Project proche du Speaker de la Chambre, John Boehner.
Ceux qui prétendaient changer Washington se rendent vite compte qu'ils ont besoin de beaucoup d'argent s'ils veulent être réélus. C'est justement ce système qu'ils affirmaient vouloir changer. Les bon principes ne durent que le temps d'être élus.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Topics

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Related Articles

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation

France: Donald Trump’s Laborious Diplomatic Debut

France: Trump’s Greenland Obsession