“Helping” EU Crisis for Purpose of Slipping Out of the Predicament

Published in China
(China) on 2 December 2011
by Zhou Jimo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Pak Ng. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
The European debt crisis has intensified dramatically as time moves on, but so far people have not seen any reaction from the U.S. in this regard. The U.S. just intervened in the Middle East turbulence with its smart power, and then made its return to the Asia-Pacific with high profile; so it seemed that its strategic intent was to shift away farther and farther from Europe. However, recently the U.S. suddenly decided to jointly create an economic stimulation plan with Europe. On Nov. 28, after the annual U.S. and European Union heads of states’ conference, Obama gave a speech and indicated that the U.S. would do its best to help make the European economy stronger. Why? Does the U.S. really want to help Europe?

In regards to the economic crisis happening in Europe, we cannot say that the U.S. has been watching the fire from across the ocean; but at least we can say that the U.S. has been playing safe and protecting itself wisely. When the high-rise falls, every one must protect his or her own interest. Europeans are hardened allies; but for the U.S., which is facing a similar crisis as well, saving itself should be regarded as its highest priority. Of course, what has made the U.S. different from the European Union, which has been trapped in the Euro and its debt crises, is that the U.S. controls the dollar in its own hands. The U.S. has more room to maneuver than Europe does as it is working to solve its own difficult issues — but just a little more room to manipulate and that is it. Continuing to issue more U.S. dollars may ease immediate urgency, as if the eyebrows had caught fire, but it cannot fill in the increasingly apparent economic black hole. At the time that even the “Super Committee” is unable to make the ends meet and fix spending problems, the U.S. will never share its dollar with other people, not even those most “intimate friends.”

The U.S. would rather not be paying attention to Europe, but it just can't afford not to care for Europe. Recently, when the domino effect appeared in the European debt crisis, the U.S. suddenly realized that the issue is just not that simple. The U.S. hasn't given Europe any assistance; however, Europe can bring some “help” to the U.S. Such “help” is nothing but something to make the U.S.' crisis worse because the relationship between the U.S. and Europe is too tight; this close relationship did not just form overnight. If the city's gateway has caught fire, the fire will spread to the fishes in the pond. Because of this close relationship, when the U.S.' sub-prime crisis impacted the global economy a few years ago, its effect on Europe was the most serious. It can be said that the European debt crisis is the outward extension of the U.S. sub-prime crisis. Therefore, if the European economic crisis will produce any extended impact, the U.S. will definitely be the first one to feel it and suffer the most.

Apparently the U.S. has clearly felt the pressure of such threat; therefore, it has demanded that European Union “immediately” solves its debt crisis. But currently it is difficult just for Europe to try to ease the problem, never mind solving this crisis “at once.” However, the reason that the U.S. even calls for “immediate” resolution is not that the U.S. lacks of understanding of Europeans' current dilemma, but that the U.S. feels overly urgent to prevent the European debt crisis from “infecting” the U.S. itself.

Of course, the U.S. knows that a demand with such one-sided wishful thinking will not be realized, so it has indicated that it would reach out and give Europeans support. But the U.S. already feels strained to just protect itself; what can it do to “support”? The U.S.' so-called “support” is just empty talk and a feint shot. For a country like the U.S., which has always been pragmatic, its real purpose is to stabilize its European allies while moving its force to the Asia-Pacific and thus withdraw its role from Europe.

Facing this situation, China needs to clearly understand two points:

First, it does not matter if one looks from the perspectives of economy and politics or history and humanity; the U.S. and Europe always belong to a complete Western system. Even the European debt crisis is like a fire burning up to the top of the house, and the U.S. doesn't even want to move one finger. The European Union still wants to come over from thousands of miles away, acting under the excuse of a mediator, get involved in the South China Sea issue, and actively joins the U.S.-led China containment camp. We can imagine that once the Euro declines, it is very possible that the European Union member nations, which are economically loose like a tray of sands, will unite solidly around the U.S., cutting in from the West, coordinating with the U.S. and its Eastern allies which are closing in from the East, to jointly contain China. Once this situation is established, China's economy will face attack from the East and the West. The forces from the East and the West appear to be in economic recession and weak; but “insects with hundreds of feet will not become rigid even after they die.” After all, they used to be a powerful bloc and have a common backup and “leader” — the United States. We should be prepared in advance and get ready for any possible threats produced by their unanimous march.

Second, even it is already very embarrassing, but as long as the U.S. can get away from the impact of the European debt crisis and slip out of this predicament like a cicada shedding its skin, it will never forget to guide the negative impact produced by the European debt crisis's radical destructive force to China. Therefore, preventing an attack from such potential negative impact should not be deemed as unnecessary. For the time being, finance is still the weakest area which can be easily attacked. The experience gained from the previous period indicates that issues like housing or rice prices are all closely and directly linked to factors in the finance sector. Therefore, controlling the gateway to finance’s opening, especially the capital market, will be the key.


欧债危机愈演愈烈,但一直以来人们并未发现美国对此有任何反映。刚刚以巧实力介入中东变乱,继而又大张旗鼓地要重返亚太,美国的战略意向似乎离欧洲越来越远。然而最近,美国却突然决定与欧洲联合制定经济刺激计划。11月28日,美国和欧盟年度峰会后,奥巴马发表讲话称:美国将尽力帮助欧洲经济变得更强劲。这是为什么?美国真的要帮助欧洲?

对于欧洲发生的经济危机,不能说美国是隔岸观火,但至少可以说,是在尽量地明哲保身。大厦将倾各自保,虽然是铁杆的盟友,但对于同样面临危機的美来说,最要紧的是自救。当然,与欧盟困于欧元及其导致的债务危机不同,美国手中握有美元,在解决自身困难的问题上,美国较欧洲有更大的回旋余地。但是,也仅是多一些“回旋余地”而已。不断增发的美元解了燃眉之急,却填不满日益显露的经济黑洞。在“超级委员会”也无法解决入不敷出的开销问题时,美国决不可能把手中的美元分给他人,哪怕是最“亲密的朋友”。

顾不上欧洲,但又不能不顾欧洲。近来,在欧洲的债务危机呈现出多米诺骨牌效益时,美国突然发现,问题并不那么简单。他不给欧洲帮助,但欧洲却可以给他“帮助”,这“帮助”不是别的,就是让他的危机更加严重。因为美国与欧洲间的关系太紧密了,而且,这种紧密的关系又并非一朝一夕所形成。城门失火,殃及池鱼。正因为有这样的关系,当年美国次贷危机在对全球经济产生影响时,对欧洲的影响才最为严重,可以说,欧债危机就是美国次贷危机的外延。那么,如果欧洲经济危机要产生什么外溢效应,首先殃及和受到最大影响的也必将是美国。

显然,美国已经明显地感觉到了这种威胁的压力,因此要求欧盟“马上”解决欧债危机。可现在的欧洲,连缓解一下都很困难,何谈“马上”解决。 但美国竟然喊出要“马上”解决,这不是因为美国对时下困境中欧洲的情况很无知,而是因为美国想阻止欧债危机“传染”自身的心情过于急迫。

当然,美国也知道这种一厢情愿的要求是不可能实现的,所以表示要出手相援,但自保都吃力的美国,拿什么去“相援”?美国的所谓“帮助”只是说说而已,虚晃一枪。向来讲求实际的美国,真正目的是一边稳住欧洲盟友,一边挥师亚太,以图金蝉脱壳。

针对这种情况,中国需更加明确两点:

一是,美国和欧洲,无论是从经济、政治还是历史、人文角度,都始终是一个完整的西方体系。尽管欧债危机快要火上房,美国连手指也不动一动, 但欧盟却仍以“充当调解人”为借口,不远万里地介入中国南海问题,积极地加入到美国遏制中国的营垒中来。可以想象,一旦欧元没落,经济上成一盘散沙的欧盟国家亦完全有可能更为一致地聚拢在美国周围,从西边切入,与东边逼近中国的美国及其东方盟友相配合,共同遏制中国。一旦这种态勢形成,中国经济将面临东西两面的夹击。尽管两个方面的力量都呈现出经济上衰退无力的态势,但“百足之虫死而不僵”,他们毕竟是曾经强大的一个整体,且有一个共同的后盾和“领导者” ——美国。对于其“步调一致”可能产生各种威胁,应提前有所准备。

二是,虽然已经很尴尬,但只要能从欧债危机的影响中“金蝉脱壳”,美国绝不会忘记将欧债危机急剧破坏力的负面影响引向中国。那么防范这种可能出现的负面影响的冲击就不是毫无必要的。就目前来讲,金融仍是最易受冲击的领域。前一段时间的经验表明,无论是房价问题,还是粮价问题,都和金融领域的因素有着直接而密切的联系。所以,把好金融开放的关口尤其是资本市场是关鍵。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Topics

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands