Muzzle Should Not Be the End of Happiness

Published in Guangming Daily News
(China) on 16 December 2012
by Xiaojuan Wan (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Stefanie Zhou. Edited by Rachel Smith.
Although it is a shooting far on the other side of the ocean, we are equally unable to bear the grief of the death of 20 innocent young children. At the moment, in our eyes, there are no color and national differences, only the same respect for life and regret for the dreams of those children.

Tragic scenes, helpless tears; we cannot help but recall the shooting at Virginia Polytechnic Institute in April 2007 by Korean student Seung-Hui Choi, leaving 32 dead; the shooting incident at the Denver City* cinema July of this year, leaving 15 dead, 50 wounded… When these devastating shootings occur again and again, when the dark muzzle is even beginning to target children, what should the country, which has a uniquely well-armed citizenry, do? If firearms are repeatedly misused by those who have lost emotional control against their compatriots, should freedom of gun ownership be a right or not?

Early in the war of independence, Americans fighting for freedom already believed that armed citizens were critical to opposing tyranny and defending civil rights. To some extent, guns are seen as spiritual totem. The United States today could consider itself to have broken away from the danger of government tyranny, and the rationale for gun possession has also undergone changes; few need guns to protect themselves and their family most of the time. However, the shootings that continue to occur today seem to suggest that when the legitimacy of gun possession is a personal decision, no one can guarantee absolute justice.

At the present, perhaps Americans both love and hate firearms. The controversy about gun control is nothing new. However, logically, when firearms have already become a threat to public safety, when innocent people are at constant risk in public places such as cinemas and schools, how can there be any debate about human rights, democracy, and freedom?

Roger, an alumnus of the elementary school, said: "Gunshots took away everything that is good from here."** From the point of view of fellow human beings, we can only deeply hope that the cold muzzle won’t be the end to happiness again.


*Editor’s note: the shooting occurred in Aurora, Colo., which is near Denver.
**Editor’s note: The original quotation, accurately translated, could not be verified.


尽管是远在大洋彼岸的一起枪杀案,但面对无辜死去的20个年幼孩童,我们同样难忍心中悲痛,此刻,在我们的眼里,已经没有肤色、民族的差异,有的只是对生命同等的尊重和对无辜孩童梦葬校园的痛惜。

惨烈的现场,无助的泪水,让我们不禁回想起2007年4月韩国学生赵承熙扫射弗吉尼亚理工学院,32人死亡;今年7月,美国丹佛市电影院发生枪击事件,15人死亡,50多人受伤……当痛击心灵的枪杀案一再上演,甚至阴森的枪口开始瞄准如花的孩子,这样一个全球唯一全民持枪的国家,又该何去何从?如果枪支一再成为情绪失控者射杀同胞的凶器,民众拥有持枪的自由,究竟是该还是不该?

早在独立战争时,争取自由的美国人就认为,公民持枪是对抗暴政、捍卫公民权的最后依仗,甚至在某种程度上视枪支为精神图腾。时过境迁,今天的美国或许自认已脱离了政府暴政的危险,持枪的实际作用也发生了一定的改变,更多的时候是对自身和家人安全的保护。但今天不断上演的枪杀案似乎说明,当持枪的正当性,交由个人决定时,谁也不能百分之百保证绝对的正义,一旦邪恶来袭,这种危险的武器,就变成了魔鬼嗜血的尖牙利齿。

此时,美国人对于枪支或许是既爱又恨,关于禁枪的争议,也由来已久。但不管是把持枪上升到“天赋人权”层面,还是出于政治选举的民意需求,一个关键的逻辑是,当枪支已经威胁到民众生命安全,当人们身处电影院、学校这样一些身心放松的公共场所,都会时刻承担无辜枉死的危险时,人权、民主、自由又从何谈起?

事发小学的校友罗杰痛心说道:“枪声带走了这里一切美好的东西。”这种毁灭的痛苦,是常人难以感受得到的。站在人类同胞的角度,我们只能深深期望,那冰冷的枪口,别再成为终结美好的句号。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Topics

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands