New sounds are to be heard in Washington. There is evidence that Democrats and Republicans are perhaps finding a common denominator after a long blockade, even on debt reduction, a topic where a deep trench gapes between the two parties. What is new is that Obama is signaling a readiness for significant savings in government spending, indeed in a place that traditionally hurts his Democrats: social programs. What is also new is that Obama’s ideas are no longer being completely rejected, at least not in closed ranks. Some conservatives have indicated willingness to compromise; at least in the atmosphere, something like a thaw is in sight.
Whether the perceived rapprochement will lead to a payoff in results is in no way guaranteed. Democrats and Republicans are too obligated to their clients; their interests in a political landscape are too different; the divisions cemented. But it is the first hope of movement in a long time. The country urgently needs it.
Es sind neue Töne zu hören in Washington. Indizien dafür, dass Demokraten und Republikaner nach langer Blockade vielleicht doch gemeinsame Nenner finden, auch beim Schuldenabbau, einem Thema, bei dem ein tiefer Graben zwischen beiden Parteien klafft. Neu ist, dass Obama die Bereitschaft signalisiert, bei den Staatsausgaben signifikant zu sparen, und zwar dort, wo es seinen Demokraten traditionell besonders wehtut: im Sozialbereich. Neu ist auch, dass Obamas Ideen von den Republikanern nicht mehr in Bausch und Bogen abgelehnt werden, zumindest nicht mehr in geschlossener Phalanx. Einige Konservative haben die Bereitschaft zum Kompromiss angedeutet, und zumindest atmosphärisch ist so etwas wie Tauwetter in Sicht.
Ob die gefühlte Annäherung zu zählbaren Ergebnissen führt, ist jedoch keineswegs garantiert. Zu sehr sind Demokraten und Republikaner ihrer Klientel verpflichtet, zu verschieden sind die Interessenlagen in einer politischen Landschaft, die Spaltungen zementiert. Aber es ist die erste Hoffnung auf Bewegung seit langem. Das Land braucht sie dringend.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
What perhaps remains unresolved, is how long the American electorate will allow Trump to reduce their country into a paranoia state, an empire of appalling tantrums and ragtag diplomacy.
From President Trump’s standpoint, a decline in the World Cup’s popularity due to Ronaldo’s absence would not be pleasant, and the same would be true for FIFA's.
So I cringe and cry when President Trump sits in his Oval Office chair silently by as Mamdani brazenly accuses Israel and its main backer, the United States of America, of genocide and war crimes.
From President Trump’s standpoint, a decline in the World Cup’s popularity due to Ronaldo’s absence would not be pleasant, and the same would be true for FIFA's.