Iraq Withdrawal Endangered

Published in Frankfurter Rundschau
(Germany) on 26 April 2009
by Andreas Schwarzkopf (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Katy Burtner.
Since the recent devastating suicide attacks in Iraq, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s comments are beginning to sound like rallying cries. During her visit to Iraq, she assured the country of America’s unwavering support – even in the worst of times – but nonetheless is sticking to America’s strategy of responsible withdrawal. What else could she say?

The bottom line is that her boss, President Barack Obama, promised the war-weary American people during his campaign that the troops would be brought home. Keeping that promise is proving to be more difficult and not as quickly accomplished as planned. The attacks were the bloodiest in nearly a year and are seen as the opening shot in a new season of violence. The causes of the violence are the as yet unsolved problems of rebuilding the nation, the ever-increasing disagreements over the sharing of oil reserves and the absence of a national reconciliation process.

All this will tie the United States military down in Iraq longer than U.S. planners had thought. That, in turn, endangers America’s new Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy where the United States hopes a troop surge will pacify the situation. The outlook isn’t bright for anyone.


Gefährdeter Rückzug
VON ANDREAS SCHWARZKOPF

Nach den jüngsten verheerenden Anschlägen im Irak klingen die Worte von Außenministerin Hillary Clinton bereits wie Durchhalteparolen. Sie sicherte dem Land während ihres Besuchs die uneingeschränkte Unterstützung zu - auch in schwierigen Zeiten, halte aber an der verantwortungsvollen Rückzugs-Strategie fest. Was soll sie auch sagen.

Schließlich hat ihr Chef und Präsident Barack Obama seinen kriegsmüden Landsleuten versprochen, die Truppen heimzuholen. Dass dies nicht so einfach und nicht so schnell geht, wie angekündigt, zeichnet sich ab. Die Attentate waren die blutigsten seit einem Jahr und gelten als Auftakt zu einer Gewalt-Serie. Ursache sind die ungelösten Probleme beim Staatsaufbau, der weiter schwelende Konflikt um die Verteilung des Öl-Reichtums und der ausgebliebene Versöhnungsprozess.

All das wird das US-Militär stärker im Zweistromland binden, als die US-Planer sich das denken. Das könnte die Strategie für Afghanistan-Pakistan gefährden, wo die USA mit mehr Soldaten für Ruhe sorgen wollen. Keine guten Aussichten für niemand.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ghana: America’s Dual Approach: War and Diplomacy in International Relations

Australia: Oil Markets Can’t Bank on Deal-Maker Donald Trump in the Middle East

Ireland: Real Legacy of Elvis May Be Contested, but His Story Recalls a Better America

Ireland: Elon Musk Is Wrong about Empathy — and Irish Film Proves It

Egypt: When Americans Finally See What We Always Knew

Topics

Austria: Do Trump and Netanyahu Really Know What They Are Doing?

France: Iran: The US Faces a Quagmire

South Korea: Strike on Elementary School Kills 175, Trump Blames Iran without Evidence

Mexico: The Empire Gone Mad

Egypt: When Americans Finally See What We Always Knew

Saudi Arabia: US Attempting To Pass the Buck to its Gulf Allies

Ghana: Ghana Must Choose Diplomacy over Alignment in the Israel-Iran Crisis

Saudi Arabia: Paradoxes of the Holy War

Related Articles

Germany: Friedrich Merz Bids Farewell to International Law

Saudi Arabia: Washington and Europe… A Rupture Confirmed by War

Germany: Trump’s Greenland Threats: The EU Must Defend Itself!

Germany: The Epstein Curse Continues To Loom Large

Germany: Donald Trump vs. James Comey: A Legal Vendetta