The Americans Are Even Trying to Shame Europeans
In the wake of U.S. [foreign] policy, the European Union has brought about the current situation through its own spineless course.
This is not just a matter of Europe having to accept immense floods of refugees, settle them, and provide them with benefits. The fact of the matter is that there may be people who are using this situation entirely for their own aims.
The British press gives a number — that of 4,000 for how many Islamic State soldiers have penetrated the EU — which I think is an exaggeration, but nevertheless, merging with the crowds of refugees is a quite convenient way for terrorists to enter the eurozone.
Therefore, European governments should launch anti-terrorist preventive measures right now; terrorism tends to spread at the speed of sound; however, any secret service should know what to do in such situations.
In general, it’s a common practice — for example, during war, there are always people among captives who are captured not by chance, but because they intended to be caught so they could execute intelligence and subversive activities.
The West made a colossal strategic mistake when it began a war in those states with regimes it does not agree with. Let the U.S. and Europe disapprove of Iraqi, Libyan and Syrian rulers, but they should each control the situations in their own states. Now there is complete chaos in these countries.
Europe is once more in a foolish position, following the path of American foreign policy and initiating military action in Arab countries.
And any armed conflict always leads to catastrophic social repercussions — besides destruction, murder and suffering, there is always an influx of refugees. The U. S. is far away across the sea, so these streams have flowed into Europe.
Thus, the United States continues to act hypocritically. The American press writes that Europe should not treat refugees so cruelly. Americans are trying to shame Europeans, to teach them how to behave and what policies to carry out in relation to refugees. However, they simply shouldn’t have bombed anyone — then there would be no migrants.
There was no need to stir up armed conflict in these countries. Everything would have been fine, but the U.S. drew Europe into this aggression, and now Europe must disentangle everything itself.
Now what must we do? First of all, stop the civil war and regulate the political situation in these dilapidated countries; that would create an international coalition for the fight against the Islamic State group — one which would consist of United Nations member states.
Second, there must be humanitarian and economic assistance for troubled Arab countries to create normal living conditions. After all, people do not become refugees of their own free will — people would not want to abandon their homeland if there weren’t bombs falling on their roofs and armed terrorists walking the streets.
This is not just a matter of Europe having to accept immense floods of refugees, settle them, and provide them with benefits. The fact of the matter is that there may be people who are using this situation entirely for their own aims.
The British press gives a number — that of 4,000 for how many Islamic State soldiers have penetrated the EU — which I think is an exaggeration, but nevertheless, merging with the crowds of refugees is a quite convenient way for terrorists to enter the eurozone.
Therefore, European governments should launch anti-terrorist preventive measures right now; terrorism tends to spread at the speed of sound; however, any secret service should know what to do in such situations.
In general, it’s a common practice — for example, during war, there are always people among captives who are captured not by chance, but because they intended to be caught so they could execute intelligence and subversive activities.
The West made a colossal strategic mistake when it began a war in those states with regimes it does not agree with. Let the U.S. and Europe disapprove of Iraqi, Libyan and Syrian rulers, but they should each control the situations in their own states. Now there is complete chaos in these countries.
Europe is once more in a foolish position, following the path of American foreign policy and initiating military action in Arab countries.
And any armed conflict always leads to catastrophic social repercussions — besides destruction, murder and suffering, there is always an influx of refugees. The U. S. is far away across the sea, so these streams have flowed into Europe.
Thus, the United States continues to act hypocritically. The American press writes that Europe should not treat refugees so cruelly. Americans are trying to shame Europeans, to teach them how to behave and what policies to carry out in relation to refugees. However, they simply shouldn’t have bombed anyone — then there would be no migrants.
There was no need to stir up armed conflict in these countries. Everything would have been fine, but the U.S. drew Europe into this aggression, and now Europe must disentangle everything itself.
Now what must we do? First of all, stop the civil war and regulate the political situation in these dilapidated countries; that would create an international coalition for the fight against the Islamic State group — one which would consist of United Nations member states.
Second, there must be humanitarian and economic assistance for troubled Arab countries to create normal living conditions. After all, people do not become refugees of their own free will — people would not want to abandon their homeland if there weren’t bombs falling on their roofs and armed terrorists walking the streets.