‘It’s the Economy, Stupid!’

Published in Liberation
(France) on 29 February 2016
by Laurent Joffrin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sophie Thresher. Edited by Danielle Tezcan.
Is the U.S. moving toward the left? Since Ronald Reagan, we were used to seeing the United States as the nation with the most unfettered liberalism. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama had certainly tempered the imperious conservative revolution, but their victory was gained at the price of a refocusing of the system, which left social issues at the bottom of the list of priorities.

Bernie Sanders’ beautiful campaign has changed the deal. Openly a social democrat (or socialist, as he says), Hillary Clinton’s challenger has modified the Democratic agenda. After more than 30 years of economic growth that reserved the benefits of this growth for a small group of millionaires (or rather, billionaires), the Americans are discovering the extent of the inequalities that their successive leaders have allowed to develop. For the first time in a long time, they are coming around to the idea of considering the advantages of a European-style minimum wage in the country of free enterprise and a minimal welfare state.

During his first election, Bill Clinton defined the meaning of his overall message with the wisecrack, “It’s the economy, stupid!” Will Hillary write “It’s society, stupid!” on the walls of her campaign headquarters? If she succeeds in the primaries, the controlled spokesperson for the Democratic establishment could still change the focus of her rhetoric, especially if she must face Trump, against whom she will compete for the votes of moderates. But Sanders, against all odds, could manage to identify America’s great wound: the arrogant tyranny of the rich.


«The economy, idiot!»

US go left ? Depuis l’élection de Ronald Reagan, on s’était habitué à voir les Etats-Unis en patrie du libéralisme le plus débridé. Certes, Bill Clinton et Barack Obama avaient tempéré cette impérieuse révolution conservatrice. Mais leur victoire avait été obtenue au prix d’un recentrage systématique qui laissait le plus souvent la question sociale en queue des priorités. La belle campagne de Bernie Sanders a changé la donne. Ouvertement social-démocrate (socialiste, dit-il), le challenger de Hillary Clinton a modifié l’agenda démocrate. Après plus de trente ans d’une évolution économique qui a réservé les bénéfices de la croissance à une mince couche de millionnaires, voire de milliardaires, les Américains découvrent l’étendue des inégalités que leurs dirigeants successifs ont laissé se développer. Pour la première fois depuis longtemps, ils en viennent à considérer les avantages d’un Smic à l’européenne au pays de la libre-entreprise et de l’Etat social minimal. Lors de sa première élection, Bill Clinton avait défini par une boutade le sens de son message : «The economy, idiot !» Hillary va-t-elle inscrire «the social idiot !» aux murs de son siège de campagne ? Porte-parole policée de l’establishment démocrate, elle a encore tout loisir, si elle l’emporte dans les primaires, de recentrer son discours, surtout si elle doit affronter Trump, à qui elle disputera les électeurs modérés. Mais Sanders, contre toute attente, aura réussi à mettre le doigt sur la grande plaie américaine : l’arrogante tyrannie des riches.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: US President Donald Trump, Chinese President Xi Jinping End Unipolar Age in Beijing

Poland: ‘Trump Brand Is Toxic.’ Australia Will Not Get Its Tallest Skyscraper*

India: When Corporate Interests Take Over Diplomacy: Inside Trump’s Transactional Approach

Israel: Has Trump Had Enough?

Topics

France: The United States Has Not Abandoned Its Expansionist Ambitions in Greenland

Japan: US-China Leadership Summit: Are the US Economic Results Exaggerated?

Poland: ‘Trump Brand Is Toxic.’ Australia Will Not Get Its Tallest Skyscraper*

South Africa: Trump’s China Visit Was a Diplomatic Disappointment

Israel: Has Trump Had Enough?

South Korea: Precarious US-China Rivalry: Risky Game of Chess

Related Articles

Venezuela: Oil, Diplomacy and Hope

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?

Israel: Faced with Diplomatic Impotence, War against Iran Is Legitimate

Germany: For All the Self-Praise, Donald Trump Faces Serious Polling Problems