Don’t Copy the Plaza Accord

Published in China Times
(Taiwan) on 5 March 2016
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Anthony Chantavy. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
The recent Group of 20 leading rich and developing nations’ finance ministers' and central bank governors' meeting in Shanghai, contrary to every foreign bank's expectations, has driven countries to take joint action to weaken the U.S. dollar, which actually means to strengthen the renminbi, as in the 1985 Plaza Accord. Mainland China also stated that it would not suddenly raise the RMB under pressure from other countries, nor would it devalue it for a temporary economic advantage. Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, stated that a new Plaza Accord is "not in the cards."

Because mainland China is undergoing an economic transition from an investment-led to a consumer-led model, its exchange rate policy did not receive too much criticism in the G-20 meeting. Of course, it must realize that as the second largest economic body and the largest trading country (and, on top of that, the largest military country) in the world, compared to Japan 30 years ago, today's mainland China has more say in the international economic system and monetary policy. Moreover, with Japan's experience to learn from, how could mainland China agree to copy the Plaza Accord?

In 1985, in order to address the U.S. trade deficit, the Plaza Accord was signed, devaluing the U.S. dollar against the yen and German mark among other main currencies after finance ministers and central bank governors from the U.S., Japan, the U.K., France and West Germany, among other developed countries, held a meeting at the Plaza Hotel. As a result, not only did the yen skyrocket, the Taiwan dollar shot up to its highest value of 24.62 per U.S. dollar in 1990; one could say that the Plaza Accord not only made Japan's economy suffer for 20 years, but also caused a shift in Taiwan's economy.

After the RMB undergoes restructuring, its exchange rate will no longer focus only on the U.S. dollar, but rather refer to a multitude of currencies and create a management-style floating currency system, bringing elasticity to its operation.

Beside this, with the slowing of U.S. interest rates and restrictions on the U.S. dollar, there is not so much concern over the RMB losing value. However, every country has economic problems, and the competitive currency devaluation that the G-20 meeting fears may yet come true.


近期在上海舉行的G20財長和央行行長會議,最終並沒有如部分外銀預期,讓各國採取「弱化美元」的聯合行動,弱化美元其實就是讓人民幣升值,如同1985年簽定的《廣場協議》(Plaza Accord)一般;大陸也表示,不會因為外在壓力而讓人民幣大幅升值,也不會為了短期的經濟效益,而讓人民幣一次性大幅貶值。國際貨幣基金(IMF)總裁拉加德公開表示,這次的G20會議,「並不存在簽署『新廣場協議』的條件。」

由於大陸正努力進行經濟轉型,由過往的投資主導型轉變為消費主導型,因此大陸的匯率政策在這次的G20會議中,並沒有遭到太多責難。當然,必須承認,做為全球第二大經濟體和第一大貿易國(再加上軍事強國),比起30年前的日本,今天的大陸在國際經濟系統與貨幣政策上,已擁有更多的話語權;更何況,有日本做為前車之鑑,大陸怎麼可能會同意複製《廣場協議》呢?

1985年,為解決美國巨額的貿易赤字,美國、日本、英國、法國及西德等5個已開發國家的財政部長和央行行長,在美國紐約的「廣場飯店」舉行會議後,簽署了所謂的《廣場協議》,促使美元兌日圓以及當時的德國(西德)馬克等主要貨幣貶值。結果不但造成日圓大幅升值,也促使台幣一路升值到曾經最高24.62元台幣兌換1美元(1990年);可以說,《廣場協議》不但讓日本承受了「失去的20年」,台灣經濟也開始反轉。

人民幣改制後,匯率不再盯住單一美元,而是參考一籃子貨幣,進行管理式的浮動匯率制度,因此人民幣的匯率機制已更富彈性。

此外,美國升息的腳步放緩、美元升值受到限制,人民幣貶值的壓力相對減輕。但是各國經濟狀況都不佳,G20會議擔心的貨幣競爭性貶值現象,恐怕還是有機會出現。

(旺報)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Topics

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Related Articles

Taiwan: Trump’s Japan Negotiation Strategy: Implications for Taiwan

South Africa: Decisions, Decisions: Can Trump Resist the Allure of Our Golf Courses and Snub Our G20?

China: Trump’s Tariff Policy Bullies the Weak, Fears the Strong and Applies Double Standards

Taiwan: Trump Stacks the Deck: EU-Canada Trade Talks Forced To Fold

Taiwan: 2 Terms Won’t Satisfy Trump