Trump: President or Mob Boss?

Published in El Espectador
(Colombia) on 5 March 2019
by Raphael Orduz (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Patricia Simoni. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
On Feb. 27, lawyer Michael Cohen, the man who for 10 years did the dirty work of protecting Donald Trump, appeared before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform.

If the protagonists’ names were omitted, you might imagine you were watching an informer testify against the head of a criminal organization — a mob boss. Of course, in such organizations, the law of silence must prevail; therefore, Cohen’s testimony was extraordinary.

And this was surprising: Not one Republican representative objected to the accusations, as though they were actually common knowledge and true. Instead, the Republicans acted as though the lawyer was not even qualified to be a traitor.

Some of the pearls tossed by Cohen:

For starters, Cohen’s definition of Trump: a liar, racist and a cheat;

Trump, according to Cohen, knew about the plot with WikiLeaks to divulge Democratic National Committee emails, aimed at discrediting candidate Hillary Clinton;

Cohen attached a copy of a check that Trump made out to him as partial payment for silencing Stormy Daniels, a porn actress and film producer, about her relationship with the magnate years before, thus violating campaign finance rules, and as payment for covering the web of lies to the president’s wife, Melania;

He presented the financial statements (2011-2013) remitted by the Trump Organization to Deutsche Bank, figures that were conveniently inflated or reduced, depending on whether the object was to obtain a loan or reduce taxes;

He said that, contrary to the official story that Trump had suspended his business dealings with Russia during the campaign, Trump was aware at all times that those dealings continued during 2016. Given the possibility of Trump campaign collusion with Russia to influence election results in November 2016, business dealings with Russia have been one of the lines of investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who will soon present his findings to the Department of Justice;

Cohen recalled that on many occasions over the years, he lied for Trump, including to Congress. In business dealings, intimidation of the other party was a mandatory part of the menu. (One recalls the mafia boss in “The Godfather”: “I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse.”) The reason Cohen gave for this conduct was that he was ambitious.

Trump, who left Hanoi on the day of the Cohen testimony without a desired announcement to dismantle North Korea’s nuclear infrastructure, is in urgent need of political oxygen, which he could seek in the form of military intervention in Venezuela.

Colombia cannot join in an adventure that will not resolve the crisis in Venezuela, and that would have grave consequences for many long years for our country. Nicolas Maduro’s necessary departure must be peaceful, and not serve the interests of the kind of individual Cohen has described.


Trump: ¿presidente o padrino?

El abogado Michael Cohen, el hombre que ejecutó durante diez años el trabajo sucio para proteger a Donald Trump, compareció el pasado 27 de febrero ante la Comisión de Vigilancia de la Cámara de Representantes de los Estados Unidos.

Si se omitieran los nombres de los protagonistas, se podría pensar que se estaba frente a un delator denunciando a la cabeza de una organización criminal, todo un padrino. Claro, en tales organizaciones debía primar la ley del silencio y, por eso, lo de Cohen resulta extraordinario.

Sorprendente: ningún congresista republicano objetó las acusaciones, como si, en verdad, fueran conocidas y ciertas. Pretendieron, más bien, la descalificación del abogado, en realidad, por traidor.

Algunas de las perlas soltadas por Cohen:

Para comenzar, la definición de Cohen sobre Trump: racista, estafador, fraude.
Trump, según Cohen, conocía de la conjura con Wikileaks para divulgar los correos electrónicos, durante la campaña presidencial del 2016, del Comité Nacional Demócrata, con el fin de desacreditar a la candidata Clinton.

Adjuntó copia del cheque de parte del pago que Trump le hizo al abogado en el intento de silenciar a la tormentosa Daniels, la actriz y productora porno, por su relación con el magnate años atrás, violando las normas de financiación electoral, amén de la red de mentiras a Melania, la esposa del presidente.

Presentó registro de los estados financieros (2011-2013) que la organización Trump remitió al Deutsche Bank, cifras que inflaba o reducía a conveniencia, dependiendo de si el objeto era la obtención de créditos o las rebajas tributarias.

Dijo que, contrario a la verdad oficial según la cual Trump había suspendido sus negocios con Rusia durante la campaña, éste estuvo siempre enterado de que ellas prosiguieron durante el 2016. Además de una eventual colusión de la campaña de Trump con Rusia para incidir en los resultados electorales de noviembre del 2016, los negocios con los rusos han sido una de las líneas de investigación del fiscal especial Mueller que en estos días presenta su informe al Departamento de Justicia.

Cohen reconoció que, durante años, mintió, en nombre de Trump, en numerosas instancias, incluyendo la del Congreso. En los negocios, la intimidación a la contraparte fue parte obligatoria del menú (acordémonos del padrino: “Le haré una oferta que no podrá rechazar”). La razón que dio Cohen: su propia ambición de trepar.

El Sr. Trump, que el día de la audiencia de Cohen salió de Hanoi sin el cacareado anuncio del desmantelamiento de la infraestructura nuclear en Corea del Norte, es el mismo que necesita oxígeno político de forma urgente y lo podría buscar por la vía de la intervención militar en Venezuela.

Colombia no puede prestarse a una aventura que no resolverá la crisis en Venezuela y que tendría consecuencias graves, por largos años, para nuestro país. La salida de Maduro, una necesidad, debe ser pacífica y no funcional a los intereses de un individuo como el que Cohen ha descrito.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Pakistan: Trump’s Gaza Blueprint Unfolds

Canada: Putin Is Negotiating Victory, Not Peace

Germany: The Art of Strategic Flattery

Canada: Minnesota School Shooting Is Just More Proof That America Is Crazed

Topics

Poland: Ukraine Is Still Far from Peace. What Was Actually Decided at the White House?

Ireland: Irish Examiner View: Would We Miss Donald Trump and Would a Successor Be Worse?

Canada: Minnesota School Shooting Is Just More Proof That America Is Crazed

Australia: Donald Trump Is Taking Over the US Federal Reserve and Financial Markets Have Missed the Point

Israel: From the Cities of America to John Bolton: Trump’s Vendetta Campaign against Opponents Reaches New Heights

Australia: Australia Boosts Corporate Law Enforcement as America Goes Soft

Turkey: Pay Up or Step Aside: Tariffs in America’s ‘Protection Money’ Diplomacy

Related Articles

Poland: Ukraine Is Still Far from Peace. What Was Actually Decided at the White House?

Ireland: Irish Examiner View: Would We Miss Donald Trump and Would a Successor Be Worse?

Australia: Donald Trump Is Taking Over the US Federal Reserve and Financial Markets Have Missed the Point

Israel: From the Cities of America to John Bolton: Trump’s Vendetta Campaign against Opponents Reaches New Heights