Trump’s Victories, a Year Later

Published in Milenio
(Mexico) on 30 January 2020
by Agustin Gutiérrez Canet (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Patricia Simoni. Edited by Arielle Eirienne.
A year ago, the United States’ program known as Remain in Mexico* began in Tijuana with the first return of Central American migrants seeking asylum. Since then, the program has been extended from Tijuana to Mexicali, Ciudad Juarez, Nuevo Laredo, Matamoros and Nogales, and the U.S. immigration authorities have returned 61,000 asylum seekers to Mexico. Then, due to U.S. pressure, the southern border with Guatemala was militarized to prevent more migrants from entering, as happened a few days ago in Suchiate** − in exchange for nothing.

People who enter the United States unlawfully through Mexico are returned to Mexico for the duration of less than one year during their immigration lawsuits. It is estimated that only 10% manage to obtain asylum in the U.S. The vast majority will be stranded in our country; that is, about 55,000 people. Most of those 55,000 people do not want to stay in Mexico, a country that does not offer better salaries than the United States, nor do they want to return to their countries to continue living in poverty and serious violence; in the end, they have no choice but to "Remain in Mexico."

Addressing this, in November the American Friends Service Committee, based in Philadelphia, published the study, "Diagnosis Between Walls: Asylum Seekers Under Migrant Protection Protocols." The AFSC concluded that the returnee population that was waiting for an answer about their immigration situation in Mexican territory is in legal limbo, full of despair and uncertainty, “since they have been victims of both organized crime and police authorities, and criminals who have robbed, extorted, kidnapped and sexually assaulted them on their journey.”

The Pro-Migrant Defense Coalition and the AFSC rejected restrictions opposing the right to asylum for foreigners in the United States and made an urgent call for their dignified treatment in Mexican territory. They are asking the Mexican government to facilitate labor insertion*** and access to health and education services, to ensure the protection of children and to create a permanent [legal] regularization program for returnees who decide to stay in Mexico. Both countries are asked that people under the Remain in Mexico program receive treatment based on respect for human rights. They demand that the U.S. government respect due process and honor family unity by avoiding family separation.

One year after the implementation of the Remain in Mexico program, President Donald Trump achieved two important victories: He stopped Central American migration and replaced NAFTA with the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, two notable political victories strengthening his hopes for reelection next November. And now he is rearming to take aim at his goal that Mexico will pay for the wall. We will soon learn how.

And in our country, among disgraceful sycophants and timid censors, the dignified and lucid voice of Porfirio Muñoz Ledo stands in support of migrants. The politician from Morena was acknowledged by the president, who quoted his recent article in El Universal entitled "No Banning,” although the president said he would not change his immigration policy.

*Translator’s note: The program, commonly referred to as “Remain in Mexico,” is the Migrant Protection Protocols.

**Translator’s note: Suchiate is the southernmost municipality in the Mexican state of Chiapas and in Mexico, itself. The Suchiate River forms the border with Guatemala and is crossed by those who migrate north from that country.

*** Translator’s note: Labor insertion is a term for the placement of workers into an existing labor force.




Hace un año, el programa de Estados Unidos conocido como Permanezca en México (Remain in Mexico) inició en Tijuana con el primer retorno de migrantes centroamericanos solicitantes de asilo. Desde entonces las autoridades migratorias estadunidenses han devuelto a México 61 mil solicitantes de asilo, mientras que el programa se extendió de Tijuana a Mexicali, Ciudad Juárez, Nuevo Laredo, Matamoros y Nogales. Luego se militarizó la frontera sur con Guatemala para evitar que ingresen más migrantes, tal como ocurrió hace unos días en el Suchiate, por las presiones estadunidenses, a cambio de nada. https://www.milenio.com/opinion/agustin-gutierrez-canet/sin-ataduras/victorias-de-trump-un-ano-despues

Las personas que entraron a Estados Unidos por México de manera irregular son retornadas a México durante la duración de menos de un año de sus juicios migratorios. Si se calcula que solo 10 por ciento logra obtener asilo en la Unión Americana, la gran mayoría se quedará varada en nuestro país, o sea, unas 55 mil personas. La mayoría de esas 55 mil personas no quiere quedarse en México, un país que no les brinda mejores salarios que en Estados Unidos, ni desea regresar a sus países a seguir viviendo en la pobreza y mayor violencia, pero al final no tienen más remedio que “permanecer en México”. Al respecto, la organización American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), con sede en Filadelfia, publicó en noviembre el estudio “Diagnostico Entre Muros: solicitantes de asilo bajo los protocolos de protección a migrantes”. La AFSC concluyó que la población retornada que esperaba una respuesta sobre su situación migratoria en territorio mexicano está en un limbo legal, lleno de desesperación e incertidumbre, “ya que la mayoría expresó haber sido víctimas de extorsión, secuestros, asaltos, agresiones físicas y sexuales durante su trayecto”. La Coalición Pro Defensa del Migrante y el comité AFSC rechazaron las restricciones contrarias al derecho de asilo que tienen las personas extranjeras en Estados Unidos e hicieron un llamado urgente a un trato digno en territorio mexicano. Piden al gobierno de México facilitar la inserción laboral, el acceso a los servicios de salud y educación, velar por la protección de la niñez y crear un programa de regularización permanente para las personas retornadas que decidan quedarse en México. A ambos países solicitan que las personas bajo el programa Permanezca en México reciban un trato basado en el respeto de los derechos humanos. Al gobierno estadunidense le exigen respetar el debido proceso y privilegiar la unidad familiar evitando la separación de familias. A un año de la implementación del programa Remain in Mexico, el presidente Donald Trump logró dos importantes victorias: frenar la migración centroamericana y sustituir el TLCAN con el nuevo TMEUC, dos notables victorias políticas para fortalecer su aspiración a reelegirse en noviembre próximo. Y ahora vuelve a la carga por el objetivo de que México pague el muro, pronto sabremos cómo. Y en nuestro país, entre cortesanos ignominiosos y censores timoratos, se alza la voz digna y lúcida de Porfirio Muñoz Ledo en favor de los migrantes. El diputado de Morena recibió el respaldo presidencial haciendo eco de su reciente artículo en El Universal intitulado “Prohibido prohibir”, aunque el presidente dijo no va a cambiar su política migratoria. https://www.milenio.com/opinion/agustin-gutierrez-canet/sin-ataduras/victorias-de-trump-un-ano-despues
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Southeast Asia Amid the US-China Rift

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Topics

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Related Articles

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge