Let Me Keep Lying

Published in Excelsior
(Mexico) on 29 May 2020
by Yuriria Sierra (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jane Vogel. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
Everything is fine as long as there are no brakes on sending a message, no matter how harmful it is. It's all good as long as social media platforms allow one to make threats as well as toss out lies. It is under these concepts that public figures have built movements and even governments.

Donald Trump is the most representative of these. And while he arrived at the White House according to the United States election process, the construction of his career is surely cemented in the audacity of his provocations, added to the ease with which he shares false news and his agility with accusations and smears.

Trump has made social media his platform. He has issued more notes, decisions and threats in the 240 characters allowed per tweet than in his encounters with the press. These are not only about his agenda, but are also memes and mockery of his opponents, which also strengthen his political muscle.

The nature of social media has allowed Trump, for example, to tell an average of 16 lies or confusing messages each day on Twitter. He has told some 18,000 lies since he became the president of the U.S., according to The Washington Post. Each one of these has been refuted with facts and by rigorous journalism.

But Trump is not the only one on Twitter. More that 340 million active users on Twitter each month have the same opportunity to send a message. Confronted with these dangers and the consequences so far, companies have sought ways to construct barriers that do not threaten freedom of expression but resolve these gaps.

All this leads up to the order that Trump signed requesting that the Federal Trade Commission investigate whether the government can regulate social media. This is a decision that will prove difficult to act on, but it is clearly a political move. He knows this issue will easily hit a brick wall, but it is a political play that opens a front with his followers, those who run out to protest against the quarantine because they see him out golfing during the long national holiday weekend.

Trump is after revenge, not only for the action Twitter took, but for the ridicule. He is turning social media into the enemy because they dare to cast doubt on the information he shares, just as they do with any other user.

People took his threat to delete his accounts more as relief than as a warning and for this reason, he opted for the executive order. Even if it were never finally enacted, the order would be a self-inflicted wound that he wishes to inflict so an election can heal it. The pandemic put the brakes on his campaign plans that include rallies with their corrosive and provocative speeches, so he has chosen to make social media his platform on which he can defend his right to keep on lying and, also make his persecutor.


Todo en orden mientras no haya freno alguno para enviar un mensaje, por más pernicioso que este sea. Todo bien, mientras entornos como las redes sociales permitan lo mismo hacer una amenaza que lanzar una mentira. Bajo estas dos ideas es que personajes públicos han construido movimientos y hasta gobiernos.
El más representativo de ellos, Donald Trump. Y si bien llegó a la Casa Blanca por la manera en que está constituido el sistema electoral de Estados Unidos, lo cierto es que la construcción de su carrera política está cimentada en su audacia para la provocación, sumada a la facilidad con la que puede compartir noticias falsas y la ligereza con la que puede soltar acusaciones y descalificativos.
Trump ha hecho de las redes sociales su estrado: han salido más notas, decisiones y amenazas de los 240 caracteres que permite Twitter en cada publicación, que de sus encuentros con la prensa. Y no sólo temas de agenda, también memes y burlas a sus opositores que de igual forma robustecen su músculo político.
Las características de las redes sociales le han permitido a Trump, por ejemplo, expresar un promedio de 16 mentiras o frases confusas cada día en Twitter. Unas 18 mil desde que comenzó su mandato como presidente de Estados Unidos, según The Washington Post; cada una de ellas ha sido desmentida en los hechos y en el riguroso registro del diario. Pero Trump no es el único, los más de 340 millones de usuarios activos que Twitter tiene cada mes, tienen la misma oportunidad de enviar un mensaje, y ante los peligros y consecuencias ya vistos, es que las compañías han buscado la manera de construir barreras que no pongan en riesgo la libertad de expresión, pero que sí resuelvan sus grietas.
Y todo esto viene a cuento por la orden que Donald Trump firmó para que la Comisión Federal de Comercio analice si desde su gobierno puede regular a las redes sociales. Una decisión que tendrá difícil su resolución, pero que a todas luces es un movimiento político. Sabe que es un tema fácil que topa con pared, pero es una jugada electoral que le abre un frente con sus seguidores, ésos que salen a manifestarse contra la cuarentena porque lo ven yendo a jugar golf en el puente largo de un día nacional.
Trump busca venganza, sino efectiva en la operación, sí en el escarnio. Convertir a las redes sociales en enemigo, porque osan poner en duda la información que comparte, como lo hacen con cualquier otro usuario. Su amenaza de borrar sus cuentas, se sintió más un alivio que una advertencia, por eso habrá optado por la orden ejecutiva. Aunque finalmente no haya sido firmada para terminar en una regulación, sí lo fue para autoinfligirse una herida que sólo querrá que sea sanada por la vía electoral. La pandemia puso freno a su campaña como estaba planeada, con esos mítines con discursos corrosivos y provocadores, así que ha optado por hacer de las redes su estrado para defender su derecho a seguir mintiendo, y también su verdugo.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Donald Trump Is Taking Over the US Federal Reserve and Financial Markets Have Missed the Point

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Germany: The President and His Private Army

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade