US ‘No Kings’ Day Resists ‘New Monarchy,’ Defends Democracy

Published in The United Daily News
(Taiwan) on 20 October 2025
by Wang Chih-hsiung (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Matthew McKay. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Large-scale “No Kings” protests took place across the United States on Oct. 18 as millions took to the streets to voice their discontent with President Donald Trump’s hardline policies.

The Revolutionary War liberated the nation from the rule of King George III, symbolizing the birth of popular sovereignty and establishing a state founded on the will of its citizens rather than on bloodline succession. Yet over two centuries later, the United States’ political landscape is eroded by paradox: Under its two-party political and democratic republican system, it has instead cultivated a “power structure” and “ideological monarchy” that is proving harder to check and balance than any monarchy.

In spirit, the United States historically opposes centralized power, personality cults, and lifelong authority in any shape or form. But today, that spirit has been distorted into a contradictory culture that is at once anti-authority and worships authority. The rise of Trumpism is the most classic example. The Republican grassroots shout that “We reject the deep state” and denounce the “Washington elite” a neo-aristocracy, yet they also see Donald Trump as a savior—a self-proclaimed “King of the People.” In a country that knows no monarch, the citizens themselves have created an “anti-king king.”

For its part, the Democratic Party promotes the spirit of “anti-monarchization” differently. In rejecting any absolute values in favor of diversity, inclusivity, and decentralization, it has inadvertently fostered the “totalitarianization of liberalism.” When strict freedom of speech replaces moral scrutiny; when historical heroes are toppled; and when the national flag is questioned as being a symbol of oppression, American society loses its shared values and cohesive beliefs.

The United States now faces a dilemma. The right wants to install a new “anti-establishment king,” while the left seeks to completely destroy all authority. Though seemingly at odds, in reality they are together eroding the cornerstones of democratic republicanism—reason and compromise. When society lacks a center and core that everyone respects, politics becomes an arena for faith and hatred.

The rise of democratic systems originally came about as a rebellion against absolute monarchies, springing from the concept of rational self-governance by the people. Yet the United States of today has transformed “anti-authoritarianism” into a new form of authority, and “freedom” into a rationale for chaos. The United States has no king, but it possesses politicians and media figures who aspire to kingship; it has no crown, yet countless individuals wear the ideological halo of self-righteousness.

Trump is without a doubt the most “monarchically inclined” president in American political history: He despises institutions, scorns traditions, demands absolute loyalty, and treats the machinery of the state as an extension of himself. He distrusts Congress, disrespects the media, and rejects judicial checks and balances.

More importantly, he has fashioned himself into a quasi-religious figure, as his followers see him as a savior persecuted by the deep state. And this is precisely what the U.S. “No Kings” movement rejects. A “new monarchy,” armed with populism and fueled by hatred. No political party has launched it, but it is composed of diverse grassroots forces, including academics, journalists, civil servants, courts of law, and even some rational Republicans. They understand that allowing Trump to continue posturing as “King of the People” will permanently distort the United States’ constitutional system.

True democracy is not about finding a leader who does your thinking for you; it is about finding a leader who insists on placing institutions above all else. When a leader tries to put himself above institutions, he has become a self-proclaimed monarch. Only this time, the king wears not a crown, but a red MAGA hat.

The author is identified as a professor at the University of Illinois Chicago.


美「無王日」對抗「新王權」 守護民主

2025-10-20 00:00 聯合報/ 汪志雄/美國伊利諾芝加哥大學教授(美國伊利諾州)

十月十八日,美國各地舉行「無王日」(No Kings)的大規模抗議活動,有數百萬人站出來表達對美國總統川普強硬政策的不滿。

美國獨立戰爭勝利,擺脫了英王喬治三世的統治,象徵人民主權的誕生,建立了一個由公民意志而非血統繼承所組成的國家。然而,兩百多年後,美國的政治生態卻陷入一個弔詭的局面;在兩黨政治、民主共和制度之下,美國卻反而培養出了一個比君主更難制衡的「權力結構」與「意識形態王權」。

美國歷史精神反對任何形式的集權、個人崇拜與終身權威。但在今日,這股精神卻被扭曲成一種「去權威卻又極端崇拜權力」的矛盾文化,「川普主義」的崛起就是最典型的例子。共和黨基層高喊「我們不要深層政府」、痛斥「華盛頓菁英」如同新貴族,卻又將川普視為救世主,如同一個自封的「人民之王」。在沒有國王的國家裡,美國人自己卻創造出一個「反王者的國王」。

另一方面,民主黨則以另一種形式實踐「反君主」化的精神,他們拒絕任何絕對價值,強調多元、包容、去中心,結果卻造成自由主義極權化。當極端的言論自由取代了道德審查、當歷史英雄被推倒、當國旗被質疑是否具有壓迫象徵,美國社會就不再有共同的價值,也不再有凝聚的信念。

如今美國陷入兩難,右派想立一位新的「反體制國王」,左派則要徹底摧毀一切權威;兩者看似對立,實則共同削弱了民主共和制度的基石─理性與妥協。當社會缺乏共同尊重的中樞與核心,政治遂變成信仰與仇恨的競技場。

民主制度的興起,原本是對君主專制的反抗,源於人民理性自治的設想。但現今的美國已把「反權威」變成了新的權威,把「自由」變成了混亂的理由。美國沒有國王,卻有一群想當國王的政客與媒體;沒有王冠,卻有無數人戴著自以為是的意識形態光環。

川普無疑是美國政治史上最具「君主特質」的總統,他藐視制度、輕蔑傳統、要求絕對忠誠,將國家機器視為個人延伸。他不信任國會、不尊重媒體、不容忍司法的制衡。

更重要的是,他把自己塑造成一種宗教式的存在,追隨者視他為「被深層政府迫害的救主」。而這正是美國這一場「無王日」運動所要對抗的,一個以民粹為武器、以仇恨為燃料的「新王權」。這場「無王日」運動並非由政黨發起,而是由各層民間力量構成,包括學者、記者、公務員、法院,甚至一部分理性的共和黨人。他們明白,若再讓川普以「人民的國王」姿態治國,美國的憲政體制將永久扭曲。

真正的民主不是找到一位「能替你思考」的領袖,而是找到一位堅持讓制度高於一切的領袖。當一個領袖試圖凌駕於制度之上,他已是個自封的國王;只是這次,這個國王不戴王冠,而是戴著「讓美國再次偉大」的紅帽子。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Pakistan: The Beginning of the 2nd Cold War

Canada: Canada Has a Better Model for Cutting Government than Trump’s Shutdown Theatrics

Sri Lanka: The Palestinian Story Outshines Flattery and Triumphalism

Ireland: The Irish Times View on the Trump-Zelenskyy Meeting: 1 Step Backward

Pakistan: Israel Bent on Sabotaging Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan

Topics

South Korea: The CIA and Its Covert ‘Regime Change’ Operations

Canada: Donald Trump Isn’t Just Demolishing the East Wing — He’s Marking Territory He Never Plans To Leave

Canada: Canada Has a Better Model for Cutting Government than Trump’s Shutdown Theatrics

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

Hong Kong: Trump’s Obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize Is a Farce

India: The World after the American Order

Related Articles

Canada: Donald Trump Isn’t Just Demolishing the East Wing — He’s Marking Territory He Never Plans To Leave

Canada: Canada Has a Better Model for Cutting Government than Trump’s Shutdown Theatrics

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals