Revenge as a Matter of Principle

Published in Frankfurter Rundschau
(Germany) on 18 June 2010
by Christoph Albrecht-Heider (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Harley Jackson.
American voters occasionally elect a reactionary president such as Ronald Reagan, and they occasionally elect a progressive like Barack Obama. Nevertheless, the vast majority steadfastly clings to the concept of revenge as the basis for American justice system. Support for capital punishment has remained stable at 60 percent and even higher for the past four decades.

Ronnie Lee Gardner awaited execution on death row for 25 years; in Germany, as a convicted murderer, he would probably have long since been set free. The debate in the United States, however, turns predominantly on irrelevant questions about whether lethal injection is humane or death by firing squad barbaric.

Obama, who is not personally against capital punishment, is familiar with the unforgiving nature of his countrymen. There exists a deep conviction that murderers have given up any right to return to society, which is why many death penalty opponents settle for life imprisonment as an alternative. The principle holds true for the United States as it does elsewhere: politicians can only do away with the death penalty if they ignore the will of the people.




Rache aus Prinzip
Von Christoph Albrecht-Heider
18.06.2010

Revenge as a Matter of Principle
By Christoph Albrecht-Heider

Manchmal wählen die US-Amerikaner einen reaktionären Präsidenten wie Ronald Reagan, manchmal einen fortschrittlichen wie Barack Obama. Aber unverbrüchlich hält die große Mehrheit am Rachegedanken als Basis des Strafrechts fest. Die Zustimmung zur Todesstrafe liegt seit vier Jahrzehnten stabil bei 60 Prozent und mehr.

American voters occasionally elect a reactionary President such as Ronald Reagan and they occasionally elect a progressive like Barack Obama. But the vast majority steadfastly clings to the concept of revenge as the basis for their justice system. Support for capital punishment has remained stable at 60 percent and even higher for the past four decades.

Ronnie Lee Gardner hat 25 Jahre auf seine Exekution gewartet; in Deutschland wäre er, ein verurteilter Mörder, wahrscheinlich längst wieder auf freiem Fuß. Die Debatte in den USA aber dreht sich weitgehend um die irrelevante Frage, ob die Exekution durch die Spritze human, die durch Gewehrkugeln hingegen barbarisch ist.

Obama, der selbst die Todesstrafe nicht grundsätzlich ablehnt, kennt die Gnadenlosigkeit seiner Landsleute. Die Überzeugung sitzt tief, dass ein Mörder die Chance auf Rückkehr in die Gesellschaft verwirkt hat, weshalb viele Todesstrafengegner alternativ für Haft bis zum Tode plädieren. Auch für die USA aber gilt: Die Todesstrafe kann nur von Politikern abgeschafft werden, die sich nicht von Volkes Stimme leiten lassen.

Erscheinungsdatum 18.06.2010 | Ausgabe: d

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Trump Has Cut the Gordian Knot in Gaza, What Comes Next?

Austria: In His Blunt Manner, Vance Comes to Netanyahu’s Aid

Bangladesh: Rare Earth Elements Are the New Drivers of Global Power

Topics

Egypt: American Mobilization in Israel

Austria: Trump Is Basically Governing Solo — for How Much Longer?

Germany: Harris Doesn’t Get It

Jordan: Why Did the US Vice President Cry?

South Africa: What South Africa’s Progressives Can Learn from Zohran Mamdani’s Victory in New York City

Bangladesh: Rare Earth Elements Are the New Drivers of Global Power

Nigeria: Electricity Will Decide the AI Race

Japan: Quad Solidarity: Do Not Backpedal on China Deterrence

Related Articles

Germany: The Epstein Curse Continues To Loom Large

Germany: Donald Trump vs. James Comey: A Legal Vendetta

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait

Germany: A Software for Authoritarian Restructuring

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

1 COMMENT