An Expected Defeat

Published in El Tiempo
(Colombia) on 3 November 2010
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Marcus. Edited by Sam Carter.
During the United States legislative elections on Tuesday, there were few surprises. The positive result achieved by the Republican Party, driven by the radical discourse of the faction called the tea party, should be seen as an expression of the dissatisfaction with President Barack Obama and his supporters in the Capitol.

Even though the White House can demonstrate positive reforms that could be considered historic in terms of health and finance, the administration has failed in that it has not known how to communicate them.

It has also produced visible results in the creation of jobs and reactivating the economy, which are vital areas for voters whose lives are very affected by these problems.

With an advantage not seen since 1948, the Republicans regained control of the House, and one of them, probably John Boehner, will be the Speaker of the House, which is the position now held by Nancy Pelosi. Some comfort to the Democrats is not having lost the Senate and thereby retaining their ability to block the initiatives coming from the lower house. However, it’s a double-edged sword because if they can’t reach agreements in specific areas, the country could find itself in legislative paralysis. Even more so when the Republican’s main promise is to bury Obama’s fundamental reform propositions.

In Colombia, some analysts see a light of hope in the Democrats’ setback regarding the progress in the U.S. Congress of the Free Trade Agreement, which has been better received among the Republicans. We have to give it a reasonable amount of time. The tea party leans more toward protectionism than toward free trade, and with unemployment around 10 percent, the initiative does not have a smooth road ahead.

On the other hand, the well-known referendum to legalize the production, purchasing and use of marijuana did not pass. There are still a lot of concerns and the government’s efforts had an effect. However, the debate continues, and it will be back on the ballot in two years.

That the party in power lost the congressional majority in the midterm elections almost always happens in United States politics.

As was shown by Bill Clinton, even after losing Congress, a president can get reelected. However, Obama will have to take on the task of renewing his electoral capital and produce the results his citizens are demanding.


Editorial: Una derrota cantada
Por: Redacción eltiempo.com | 7:36 p.m. | 03 de Noviembre del 2010

En las elecciones legislativas del martes en Estados Unidos hubo pocas sorpresas. El buen resultado alcanzado por el Partido Republicano, impulsado por el discurso radical de la facción denominada Tea Party, debe ser leído como una expresión de descontento con el presidente Barack Obama y su bancada en el Capitolio.

A pesar de que la Casa Blanca puede mostrar a su favor reformas que podrían catalogarse como históricas en materia de salud y financiera, la administración ha fallado en saberlas comunicar.
Además, en producir resultados visibles en generación de empleo y reactivación de la economía, temas vitales para los votantes, que cobraron por ventanilla.

Con una ventaja sin igual desde 1948, los republicanos recuperaron el control de la Cámara, y uno de los suyos, probablemente John Boehner, ocupará la presidencia de ese órgano, que ostenta Nancy Pelosi. El consuelo demócrata es no haber perdido el Senado y retener así su capacidad para frenar las iniciativas que emanen de la Cámara baja. Arma de doble filo, pues, si no logran acuerdos en áreas específicas, el país se puede ver abocado a una parálisis legislativa. Más cuando la principal promesa republicana es echar por tierra fundamentales reformas propuestas por Obama.

Para Colombia, algunos analistas ven en este traspié demócrata una luz de esperanza para el trámite en el Congreso de EE. UU. del Tratado de Libre Comercio, que ha sido de mejor acogida entre los republicanos. Hay que dar una prudente espera. El Tea Party tiende más al proteccionismo que al libre comercio, y con el desempleo todavía rondando el 10 por ciento, la iniciativa no tiene tan allanado el camino.

Por otra parte, el sonado referendo sobre legalización de la producción, comercio y consumo de marihuana no pasó. Aún hay muchas prevenciones y los esfuerzos del Gobierno surtieron efecto. Pero el debate continúa y en dos años volverá a las urnas.
Que el partido en el poder pierda la mayoría en el Congreso en elecciones de mitaca es algo casi habitual en la política de EE. UU.
Como lo demostró Bill Clinton, incluso perdiendo el Congreso, un mandatario puede conseguir la reelección. Pero Obama tendrá que asumir la tarea de renovar su capital electoral y producir los resultados que sus ciudadanos reclaman.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Sri Lanka: The Palestinian Story Outshines Flattery and Triumphalism

India: The Real Question behind the US-China Rivalry

South Korea: The CIA and Its Covert ‘Regime Change’ Operations

Canada: Canada Has a Better Model for Cutting Government than Trump’s Shutdown Theatrics

Topics

South Africa: Israel-Palestine Conflict: The Shaky Ceasefire Is Still a Pivotal Window of Opportunity

South Africa: Trump’s ‘Self-Styled Pragmatism’ Closing the Door on Ukraine

Trinidad and Tobago: A Time for Diplomacy

Mexico: Science, the Light on the Path

Germany: Trump Is Flying Low

Spain: Ukraine, Unarmed

Argentina: Power on the World Stage

South Korea: The CIA and Its Covert ‘Regime Change’ Operations

Related Articles

Colombia: The End of the Dollar’s Reign?

Colombia : Trump’s Strategy against Maduro

Colombia: The ‘Toy’ Trump Gave to Musk

India: Will Fallout at Home, Abroad Restrain Trump Disruption?

Australia: Trump’s Tariff Tango Will Only Reinforce His View that Bullying Works