WikiLeaks/U.S. Cable: U.S. ShouldPrevent China’s Intimidation of Taiwan

Published in United Daily News
(Taiwan) on 5 December 2010
by Central News Agency (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Lisa Ferguson. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
(Central News Agency/Taipei, Dec. 5th Report)

WikiLeak’s newly exposed U.S. foreign relations cable contains numerous references to Taiwan; most of these secret cables originating from the American embassy in Beijing state that the Taiwan issue is a key factor influencing U.S.-China relations, and that it is thought that the U.S. should prevent the intimidating actions China has taken towards Taiwan.

The main subject of a January 6, 2009 secret cable sent by the American embassy was the 30-year outlook for U.S.-China relations. It said that despite the improvement in cross-strait relations following Taiwan’s election of President Ma Ying-jeou, the Taiwan issue remains the most difficult issue to deal with in U.S.-China relations, and that for the foreseeable future, it will continue to be an issue that must be handled carefully.

At that time, the American embassy’s Clark T. Randt also sent a cable saying: “We should continue to support Taiwan and Mainland efforts to reduce tension by increasing Taiwan's "international space" and reducing the Mainland's military build-up across from Taiwan.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/185826

The cable said: “In the years to come, our defense experts will need to closely monitor China's contingency plans and we will need to use every diplomatic and strategic tool we have to prevent intimidating moves toward Taiwan.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/185826

The American embassy sent a cable on January 28 of this year on the subject of the economic-material factors testing U.S.-China relations in 2010, in which it mentioned China’s continued stance of intense dissatisfaction with the U.S. on the issues of the Dalai Lama and arms sales to Taiwan. For these reasons, the cable expressed that there might not be a way for China to cooperate with the U.S. on other issues.

Prior to this, on April 16, 2008, the American embassy sent a cable indicating Chinese Premier Hu Jintao’s control over Tibet policy (in which Taiwan was also mentioned), quoting an unidentified person from the Chinese side, saying the Chinese leadership has “absolutely no difference of opinion” on the Tibet issue, and from the Chinese leadership’s perspective, the Tibet issue is considered even more sensitive than the Taiwan issue.

This source revealed that on issues such as Taiwan, economic development, or government reform, there is probably room for disagreement within the Chinese leadership, but on Tibet this is not the case.

The cable said that the source thought that from the perspective of the Chinese leadership, Tibet policy was even more sensitive than the Taiwan issue. He pointed out, although Beijing says it will not accept American interference in Taiwan affairs, in reality it still does. However, China absolutely will not accept foreign powers “meddling” in Tibetan affairs.

On this point, according to a March 28, 2009 cable, when visiting the White House, Australia’s then prime minister, Kevin Rudd, stated during talks with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, his view that Chinese leaders have a paranoid attitude when it comes to the issues of Taiwan and Tibet.

However, Rudd pointed out that subtle differences remain between Chinese leaders’ attitudes on Taiwan and Tibet; on the Taiwan issue, their reaction is almost rational, as the issue is also deep-rooted and emotional. But the tough policy towards Tibet, on the other hand, is meticulously planned so as to send a clear message to other minority groups.


This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

India: ‘Make America Great Again’ Not Just Election Slogan — It’s Trump’s Firm Resolve

Saudi Arabia: From Saddam to Maduro

Germany: Drones Targeting Putin? US Security Guarantees for Ukraine Would Be Worthless as Proposed

Spain: What’s Dying in Caracas

Ghana: Is US Intervention in Venezuela a Step Too Far?

Topics

Germany: We’re Dividing Up the World as We Please

Australia: First Venezuela, then the US Fed — What the White House Attacks Mean for Us

Australia: Donald Trump Is Reshaping American Power and the Threat to International Order Is Alarming

Germany: Drones Targeting Putin? US Security Guarantees for Ukraine Would Be Worthless as Proposed

Ghana: Is US Intervention in Venezuela a Step Too Far?

Related Articles

Australia: China-Taiwan-US Triangle Held Together by Assumptions and 1 Dangerous Lie

Hong Kong: US Military Uses, Taiwan Pays the Bill: America Won’t Stop until It Squeezes Taiwan Dry

India: Arms Sale to Taiwan Deepens US-China Friction as Military Drills Intensify

Philippines: Our US Alliance May Well Get Our Nation Destroyed

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned