Iraq: The Great Deception

Published in La Nacion
(Chile) on 17 February 2011
by Raul Sohr (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Patricia Simoni. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
The three reasons given by Bush to attack Baghdad were unfounded. There were no weapons of mass destruction; Iraq was not in the process of acquiring uranium and had no links to al-Qaida.

The author of one of the key lies that led to war against Iraq in 2003 has confessed. Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, known by the nickname of "Curveball," was the Iraqi informant who invented the stories about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Eight years after the conflagration, he has acknowledged that the secret factories, as well as the trucks loaded with biological and chemical weapons, were merely his own inventions. Why did he promote such lies? In an interview with the British newspaper The Guardian, he anwered, "They gave me the opportunity to concoct something that would overthrow the regime. My children and I are proud of it, and we are proud that we are one of the reasons that provided Iraq with a margin of democracy."

Janabi, a chemical engineer, left Iraq in 1995. In 2002, he made contact with the BND [Bundesnachrichtendienst], the German intelligence agency, and the agents to whom he told his fantasies. According to him, he made an agreement that his statements would not be transmitted to third countries.

Nevertheless, the BND wasted no time in sharing the information with the CIA. The data provided by Janabi was tailor-made for the George W. Bush administration, which was already prepared to attack Iraq. This was the perfected justification, to offset public opinion, to invade the Arabic nation.

It has been known for a while that Iraq never had the weapons of mass destruction that had been described. It was officially established in the United States in 2005, by an investigative commission. What is unknown is to what extent the BND cooperated in the charade.

According to Jenabi, he called his BND contact and reproached him for having broken the agreement not to disclose his information. The protest led to his being confined for three months, the length of time that elapsed before the invasion of Iraq.

In fact, all three reasons given for attacking Baghdad were unfounded. There were no weapons of mass destruction, and Iraq was not in the process of acquiring uranium and had no links to al-Qaida.

In the U.S., defenders of the Bush regime claim they were intoxicated or misled, as they say in intelligence jargon, by Curveball alias Janabi. It is now clear that Washington saw what it wanted to see.

It is the second time the U.S. entered a major war for an ultimately non-existent reason. The previous conflict was Vietnam. There, they used an alleged attack by North Vietnamese torpedo boats on a couple of U.S. destroyers as an excuse to start bombing North Vietnam. Eventually it was established that the so-called Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which precipitated the war, never really took place.


Confesó el autor de una de las mentiras claves para desencadenar la guerra contra Irak en 2003. Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi fue el informante iraquí, conocido por el apodo de “Curveball”, que inventó las historias sobre Armas de Destrucción Masiva (ADM) de Saddam Hussein.

Ocho años después de la conflagración ha reconocido que tanto las fábricas secretas como los camiones cargados con armas biológicas y químicas eran meras invenciones suyas. ¿Por qué propaló semejante mentiras? En una entrevista concedida al periódico británico The Guardian respondió: “Ellas me dieron la posibilidad de urdir algo que permitiera botar al régimen. Mis hijos y yo estamos orgullosos de ello y estamos orgullosos de que somos una de las causas que dieron a Irak un margen de democracia”.

Janabi un ingeniero químico abandonó Irak en 1995 y en Alemania entró en contacto, en 2002, con el BND, el servicio de inteligencia germano. A los agentes con los cuales trataba contó sus fantasías. Según él llegó a un acuerdo que sus declaraciones no serían transmitidas a terceros países.

El BND, en todo caso, no vaciló en compartir la información con la CIA. Para el gobierno de George W. Bush, que ya se preparaba para atacar Irak, los datos aportados por Janabi le venían como anillo al dedo. Era la justificación perfecta, de cara a la opinión pública, para invadir la nación árabe.

Desde hace mucho que ya se sabe que Irak nunca dispuso de las mentadas armas de destrucción masiva. Ello fue establecido de manera oficial en Estados Unidos a través de una comisión investigadora en 2005. Lo que se desconocía es hasta qué punto el BND cooperó en la farsa.

Según la versión de Janabi se comunicó con su contacto el BND y le reprochó haber roto el acuerdo de no divulgar su información. La protesta le valió ser confinado por tres meses. El tiempo que transcurrió hasta la invasión de Irak.

En rigor las tres razones esgrimidas para atacar Bagdad carecían de toda base. No había armas de destrucción masiva, Irak no estaba en el proceso de adquirir uranio y tampoco tenía vinculaciones con Al Qaeda.

En Estados Unidos los defensores del régimen de Bush alegan que fueron engañados o intoxicados, como dicen en la jerga de inteligencia, por Curveball alias Janabi. Ahora es claro que Washington vio lo que quería ver.

Es la segunda vez que Estados Unidos entra en una guerra de grandes proporciones por un motivo que a la postre resulta inexistente. El conflicto anterior fue el de Vietnam. Allí se esgrimió el supuesto ataque contra un par de destructores norteamericanos por parte de torpederas norvietnamitas como la excusa para iniciar los bombardeos a Vietnam del Norte. Con el tiempo se estableció que el llamado “Incidente del Golfo de Tonkín”, que precipitó la guerra, en realidad nunca tuvo lugar.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Topics

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Related Articles

Chile: (Fictional) Female US Presidents We Remember

China: There Should Be No More Monroe Doctrine in the Americas

Chile : An Indicted Former President

U.K.: The Guardian View on the Other 9/11: Pinochet’s Dictatorship Casts a Lengthening Shadow

Pakistan: Killing Democracy