Shanghai Disneyland: The Integration and Competition of Sino-U.S. Soft Power

Published in ifeng/China News/Wen Wei Po
(Hong Kong) on 15 January 2009
by Zhang Jingwei (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Alan Kwok. Edited by .
Wen Wei Po from Hong Kong had an article on January 14 revealing that after all these years, the location of China’s Disneyland has finally been decided. Disney confirmed on the 9th that it will be located at Pu Dong, Shanghai. The first phase is going to take 150 hectares, six times the size of Hong Kong Disneyland. The construction is expected to be completed in 2014 at the earliest. The fact that the dream project came true is a result of the economic and cultural interaction and competition between China and the U.S. It is also an end product of soft power integration between the two countries.

The Original Article:

After all these years, the location of the Mainland China Disneyland has finally been decided. Disney confirmed on the 9th that it will be located at Pu Dong, Shanghai. The first phase is going to take 150 hectares, six times the size of Hong Kong Disneyland. The construction is expected to be completed in 2014 at the earliest. The fact that the dream project came true is a result of the economic and cultural interaction and competition between China and the U.S. It is also an end product of soft power integration between the two countries.

Economically, Disneyland in Europe and Hong Kong have been experiencing a deficit since 2007. Under the current financial crisis, Disney’s operations have become even more difficult. According to Disney’s fourth season financial report, the company’s profit has dropped 26.6%. The European Disneyland and the Hong Kong Disneyland, have together lost over 100 million U.S. dollars. The majority of Disneyland’s visitors are children and youth. They lose interest in things easily and therefore can’t really become “frequent visitors." Only by exploring new markets could Disney stop its drop in profit. Speeding up negotiations over Mainland China's Disneyland is in Disney’s best interest to escape from the plight.

The Chinese side is concerned because the country is being called to expand domestic demand. Disneyland settling in China is a one stone for two birds solution--it expands domestic demand while attracting foreign investment. As a result, Disneyland can also be seen as vital in terms of benefits between the U.S. and China.

Expanding Domestic Demands While Appealing To Foreign Investment

Culturally, Hollywood blockbusters and Disneyland are the cultural symbols of American values. Hollywood blockbusters have been widely introduced in China for many years. In return, Chinese movies have successfully entered the American market and brought the country’s attention to outstanding Chinese directors such as Zhang Yimou, Chen Kaige and Feng Xiaogang as well as actresses such as Zhang Ziyi and Gong Li.

Meanwhile, it has enabled a tight assembly of China’s popular culture in international society, making China’s soft power more abundant in the multi-lingual environment. While China is now pursuing creative industry and culture, the landing of Disneyland in China will doubtlessly make China’s comic and animation industry, creative products and theme park culture more prosperous.

This means that the Chinese government will be holding onto the Disneyland project. That is to say that, despite its American-style economy and culture, the Mainland China Disneyland will definitely be Chinese.

The landing of Disneyland in Mainland China is different than other industries--it will have a thorough exploration of the Chinese market and will also upgrade Disney to an intelligent label through China's broad and sophisticated history and culture. In recent years, Disney movies have been utilizing Chinese history and culture. First there was "Mulan" and then "The Secret of the Magic Gourd."

"Mulan," which was an independently Disney production, wasn’t very popular among Chinese people. This is because the movie did not include real Chinese cultural elements. "Kung Fu Panda" by DreamWorks Animation, however, had a much higher rating among Chinese due to its inclusion of real Chinese elements. By entering China, Disney will have its relevant products further adapted to correct Chinese culture in the future.

We can see Mainland China Disneyland not just as Disney simply landing in the Mainland China market, but also as a new form of cultural product, a product of win-win cooperation.

The Integration of Chinese and U.S. Soft Power

Ever since opening, there have been a lot of American investments in China. Economic cooperation has, on the one hand, facilitated the two countries’ relationship and, on the other hand, unfortunately, has led to hard power conflicts and confrontation over trade. Sino-American cooperation over Mainland China Disneyland is an economic and commercial alliance based on the two cultures. It is the final integration product of the two countries’ soft power.

In terms of economy and culture, the U.S. is energetic, outgoing and aggressive. China, however, is more general and inclusive. Two civilizations meeting each other might generate a new culture and new tide for the 21st century global village. It might be what Mainland China Disneyland is meant to do.

It is estimated that those under 15 years old in China will reach 300 million.
If each spends 200 yuan at Disneyland, we will be looking at a basic consumption of 60 billion yuan, which does not include other relevent industrial sales. Thus, the establishment of Mainland China Disneyland can be considered the greatest decision Disney has ever made.

What interferes with Mainland China Disneyland is the activation of the Chinese Disney Channel. It’s better for both sides to take a step back. Disney should respect Chinese tradition and customs and China could probably break the ice – if there is any – by granting the opening of the Chinese Disney Channel. Perhaps the Chinese Disney Channel could bring the entire Chinese broadcast system to reform. We might expect a situation in which a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred different entities compete with one another.




上海迪斯尼显出中美软实力博弈融

中新网1月14日电 香港《文汇报》14日刊文说,酝酿多年的中国迪斯尼乐园选址情况终于水落石出。美国华特迪斯尼公司9日证实,上海迪斯尼乐园选址浦东,首期占地150公顷,是香港迪斯尼的6倍,最快2014年建成启用。这个项目能够呼之欲出,是中美双方在经济文化层面博弈折中的结果,也是中美软实力融合的产物。

文章摘录如下:

酝酿多年的中国迪斯尼乐园选址情况终于水落石出。美国华特迪斯尼公司9日证实,上海迪斯尼乐园选址浦东,首期占地150公顷,是香港迪斯尼的6倍,最快2014年建成启用。这个项目能够呼之欲出,是中美双方在经济文化层面博弈折中的结果。

从经济层面而言,从2007年开始,欧洲和香港的迪斯尼就出现了亏损。在金融危机情势下,迪斯尼的经营情况变得更为糟糕,据迪斯尼第4财季报告,迪斯尼盈利下跌26.6%,欧洲和香港迪斯尼合计亏损1亿美元以上。由于乐园项目的消费群体聚焦于少年儿童,喜爱新奇的孩子们往往形成不了“回头客”。迪斯尼要遏制利润下滑的市场颓势,只有开拓新的市场,加快中国迪斯尼项目的谈判,就成为迪斯尼方面摆脱窘境的最佳选择。

对中方而言,目前正处于扩大内需的市场拐点,迪斯尼落地中国,即可实现扩大内需和吸引投资两大利好。所以,迪斯尼也可称作中美利益攸关的现实标本。

既扩内需 又引外资

从文化层面而言,好莱坞大片和迪斯尼乐园是体现美国价值观的代表性文化产品。对于好莱坞大片,中国多年前已经深度引入,和中国本土电影相融合嫁接,形成了具有中国特色的大片,并打入美国市场,造就了中国具有国际影响力的导演(如张艺谋、陈凯歌、冯小刚等)和明星(章子怡、巩俐等)。

同时,也促成了中国的大众市场文化同国际社会的无缝对接,丰富了多元语境下的中国软实力的内容。在中国追求创意产业、创意文化的现实下,迪斯尼来到中国无疑会繁荣中国的动漫产业、创意产品和乐园文化。

值得一提的是,迪斯尼落户上海浦东,不是美国文化产业的简单置入和市场延伸,而是美式文化产品在中国的改造升华。据洛杉矶分析公司凯瑞丝(Caris)的分析师戴维·米勒表示,迪斯尼可能会出资3至6亿美元,占股43%;用以换取5%的门票收入和10%的特许经营权收入。

这就意味着,中方将对未来的迪斯尼项目实现控股。所以,在华的迪斯尼项目,虽然其血统里沉淀着美国经济和文化的基因,但却是典型的中国版迪斯尼。

和其它产业抢占中国市场不同,迪斯尼落户中国不仅仅是为了深耕中国市场,还在于发掘中国博大精深的历史文化,升华迪斯尼的知识品牌。近年来,迪斯尼在推出全球经典大片方面,开始从中国历史文化中汲取营养,先是拍摄了《花木兰》,接着合拍了《宝葫芦的秘密》。

值得一提的是,迪斯尼独立创作的动画大片《花木兰》在华人世界并不畅销,原因在于没有融入原生态的中国文化元素。而梦工厂出品的《功夫熊猫》由于吸纳了原汁原味的中国元素而在华人世界取得了不菲的票房。迪斯尼落户中国,将使未来的迪斯尼产品在中国文化的演绎上形神兼备。

可以说,中国版迪斯尼不仅仅是迪斯尼简单的市场抢滩行为,而是代表着一种新生的文化产品,是强强联合的产物。

中美软实力融合的产物

改革开放以来,美国跨国企业在华投资的不少,但单纯经济层面的合作在促进两国关系的同时,也造成了两国的贸易争端和硬实力碰撞时的忌惮。中美在迪斯尼项目上的合作,是以两个文化的对接为基础的经贸合作,是中美软实力融合的产物。

无论美国经济还是文化,其突出的特点就是充满活力的外向性和进取型,而中国经济和文化的特点则是海纳百川的开放性和融合性,两大文明相遇或会成就21世纪引导地球村新潮流的新文明。中国版迪斯尼,也许就承担着这样的时代使命。

从可预见的市场前景看,中国15岁以下的少年儿童高达3亿人。如果这些消费者在中国的迪斯尼乐园人均消费200元,其基础的市场消费额将高达600亿元人民币,这还不算中国版迪斯尼衍生出来的其它产业链。因此,迪斯尼乐园落户中国,可称得上是迪斯尼最伟大的创意。

困扰中国版迪斯尼的症结是迪斯尼中文频道的开设。在我看来,双方不妨互让一步。对迪斯尼而言,落户中国必须有尊重中国国情的诚意;对中国而言,不妨采取合作开设迪斯尼频道的方式破解这一难题。也许,一个迪斯尼频道,将促使中国广电系统试水改革,从而形成百花齐放、百舸争流的竞争新局。(张敬伟)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

India: Peace Nobel for Trump: It’s Too Long a Stretch

Canada: Canada’s Retaliatory Tariffs Hurt Canadians

Australia: Donald Trump Is Not the Only Moving Part When It Comes to Global Trade

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump and Ukraine: a Step in the Right Direction

Topics

Canada: How To Avoid ICE? Follow the Rules

Canada: Trump Doesn’t Hold All the Cards on International Trade

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump and Ukraine: a Step in the Right Direction

Australia: As Trump Turns His Back on Renewables, China Is Building the Future

Germany: Bad Prospects

Germany: Musk Helps the Democrats

India: Peace Nobel for Trump: It’s Too Long a Stretch

Ecuador: Monsters in Florida

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Hong Kong: What Makes US Trade War More Dangerous than 2008 Crisis: Trump

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump