Auctioning Off Palestine

Throughout history, the West and America have only known the “peace of compliance,” and they have never known the “peace of justice.” Only justice can create peace; anything else is quackery, fraud and extortion. If we take a slice of history, for example, the last hundred years, you’ll find that the fierce imperial conflict between Britain and France, which lasted for more than a hundred years before 1904, did not stop until the two empires decided to divide the world between them, end the strife and establish “peace.”

Yet, during that same period, the world has seen the only two world wars in history, in addition to dozens of regional wars, large, medium and small. Hence, no claim can be made that a year has passed without aggression, murder, fighting, looting and sabotage by the West and America against three entire continents of the world’s five, namely Africa, Asia and South America.

So the two empires that were about to be left out of history, Britain and France, had to search for factors to renew and develop continuing influence in the world, and specifically in the Arab region, “as the center of the world, the pivot of power and control over the world,” according to Chaim Weizmann himself at the World Zionist Congress held in 1948 in Montreal, Canada.* Hence, British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour’s imperial promise in 1917 to establish a “homeland for Jews in Palestine” to tighten their grip on the road to India, the crown jewel of the British Empire, in addition to gaining control of the Suez Canal, the base point to controlling policy, the economy, communication and war in the world. Also, the new empire that was preparing to enter history, the United States of America, had to begin its imperial age by securing control of the Arab region, so the U.S. Congress passed a law in March 1922 stating the need to establish “a Jewish homeland in Palestine” for the same reasons, motivations and imperial ambitions.

American imperial interests and the Balfour Declaration laid the foundation for the emergence of the Zionist entity, but the “American law” is more serious and dangerous than the “British statement,” which is merely a letter written by a foreign secretary. This is in addition to what Weizmann himself said during the Montreal conference noted earlier: “It is not true that what binds us to Palestine are matters relating to Judaism, but because it controls the world and that the quantities of oil under the Dead Sea are five times higher than in the Americas, in addition to other precious metals.”* In 1953, David Ben-Gurion said, “I am an atheist.”* It is known that both Argentina and Uganda were nominated during the Basel, Switzerland conference in 1897 to be “a national homeland for the Jews.” Palestine has been a preference for the aforementioned reasons only.

That leaves us with the fact that Israel has been “manufactured” to carry out a specific role, which is to protect the interests and objectives of the colonial system, past and present, whether it’s for France, Britain or America. This role could only be achieved if an alien entity was planted to prevent the connection between the Arab world’s east and west, and served as a powerful watchdog on the banks of the Suez Canal on one side and the massive lakes of Arab oil on the other side.

Power to that watchdog can only be achieved in the form of “racist colonial expansion” following the examples of the colonial situations established by Britain in India and South Africa, by France in Algeria, by Portugal in Mozambique, and by the U.S. in North America.

From the statements above, it becomes clear that Israel is not a state nor a natural society, but a state and society prepared in a “laboratory,” meaning that all the elements of success were provided for the experiment to accomplish the targeted results. History has never seen a case where the phenomenon of colonialism voluntarily retreats, in terms of its lust for aggression, domination and the pillaging of energy, capabilities and lands as far as its hands can reach, other than by a strong counterforce to the waves of colonial invasion, rejection and resistance. Indeed, these same global liberation movements managed to wipe Britain and France from history. It is likely that the same fate awaits the United States of America and the Zionist entity. That’s the verdict of history and its wisdom, no matter how the colonial phenomenon and the world’s Zionists try to delay the moment of fracture for as long as possible.

There is no person, party or organization in Israel, let alone a government, that could adopt a sense of just peace that Arabs wouldn’t accept or understand. In addition, it is not permitted in the U.S. and Arab retroactive point of view to think of an individual, party or organization, let alone a government in the Arab world, that could adopt a sense of just peace that Arabs wouldn’t accept or understand. Now Jerusalem and all of Palestine is being zionized, and the file of this central Arab case has been closed under the nose and silence of the Arab political systems, to the point that Netanyahu did not hesitate to seriously affront the Arab political systems in three consecutive situations. The first was when he announced the resumption and increase of building settlements in Jerusalem, while the U.S. vice president was visiting. The other was when he stood before the AIPAC in the heart of America and declared that “Jerusalem is not a settlement. It is our capital.” His declaration wasn’t accorded any reaction, objection or even resentment from the official Arab political systems. The third is the most insulting. During the recent Arab Summit in Libya, where the participants heard and watched all of this in shameful silence. In their search to become “followers,” they discussed the proposal “to form a regional group” consisting of Arab countries, Turkey, Iran and Israel too if it stopped building settlements! The strange thing is that this proposal has been on the table for more than five years!

The “auctioning of Palestine” is the heart of the case, and it cannot be stopped even with thousands of justifications, statements, agreements, treaties and conferences. The only way to do so is by resisting the “auction” and destroying it. Therefore, the question for Netanyahu and the aggressive, Zionist, expansionist, butcher’s government is whether it is one of war or one of peace? We say that this question is a tribute to the immoral Zionist; it raises the possibility of him being a man of peace, whatever the proportion of this possibility may be, which does not exist anyway. Also, the question is an insult to the mind, reality and dignity of Arabs. Because such a question assumes that we stand outside our reality, as spectators instead of actors, or assumes that we can sacrifice our rights, our land, our homes and our dignity to discussion or negotiation, and either way, it’s nothing less than a humiliating insult.

This is a snapshot of the Zionist entity’s file, written by colonialism, Zionism and Arab retroactive systems. This is the entity that Arab political systems are unable to stand up to, even though they have the potential, forces and energies, without limitations. It’s also the same file that is being left to future generations, who will most definitely possess the boldness to deal, reject, resist, retaliate, win and return the insult.

*Editor’s Note: Quotes could not be verified.