What Comes After Assad
Published in al-Qabas
(Kuwait) on 22 June 2013
by Fakhri Hashem as-Sayyed Rajab (link to original)
(Kuwait) on 22 June 2013
by Fakhri Hashem as-Sayyed Rajab (link to original)
Translated from
by Ryan Miller.
Edited by Lydia Dallett.
Whoever wants a peaceful solution would not send weapons and money, nor would they pay mercenaries to kill the Syrian people. For its part, Syria is the last of the states to resist Israel.
What does the U.S. really want from the destruction of the Arab world, the fracturing of its people, racial discrimination, the spread of sectarianism, the killing of innocents and the sowing of discord? Yet what else were we to believe would happen to the region when, in her 2005 report, Condoleezza Rice discussed creative chaos and the new Middle East? America did not tamper with the foreign minister's acknowledgement that they themselves had sowed the seeds of al-Qaida in Afghanistan, and that now they are harvesting the results.
When we turn back the clock, we see that the main problem from east to west and from north to south – indeed for the entire world – is the founding of the state of Israel. It is a terrorist state of the highest degree, which the West implanted to be both a fork in the advancement of the Arab states and a policeman to the region, so that no state could breathe but by way of the Zionist enemy, the enemy of all nations. Yet who can antagonize Israel without antagonizing the Semites?
The West's first plans began with the creation of the Iran-Iraq War by way of its first hireling Saddam Hussein, who destroyed the Arab World and lost all prestige and dignity. The war lasted eight years, exhausted both sides and killed hundreds of thousands – and it was followed by the occupation of Kuwait and Muslim genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina. And how did the Arab League respond? Only by censuring criticism and occupying Iraq in 2003. In spite of it being an energy producer, Iraq still has an electricity crisis, as if the clock had been turned back tens of years. Similarly, Libya was destroyed, turned into chaos, and is full of weapons and insurgents. They proudly send Arab fighters to support the people of Libya, yet what did the Libyans gain? Here, oil is legitimate blood money, and it is France's gift for standing up for and loving the Libyan people.
After that, the crisis expanded into Syria, the last of the fortified castles; yet it did not reach Damascus, the ruined gateway to the Arab world. Instead, it found the city closed to any compromise or proposal for a peaceful solution, as if the crisis were not one of an Arab state. Unfortunately, Damascus became an obstacle for the majority of Arab states.
Whoever wants a peaceful solution does not send arms and huge sums of money, nor do they arm and pay mercenaries to kill an entire people – which is the pretense for eliminating the Syrian regime. What we are seeing now is the complete elimination of the Syrian Arab Republic, both its army and its people.
We are watching the massacre of the Free Syrian Army and the slaughter of innocents. Is this the government that we want?
Some of the Arabs' hands are stained with innocent blood due to their obstinacy, betrayal and conspiring. Are these the signs of the hour?
What does the U.S. really want from the destruction of the Arab world, the fracturing of its people, racial discrimination, the spread of sectarianism, the killing of innocents and the sowing of discord? Yet what else were we to believe would happen to the region when, in her 2005 report, Condoleezza Rice discussed creative chaos and the new Middle East? America did not tamper with the foreign minister's acknowledgement that they themselves had sowed the seeds of al-Qaida in Afghanistan, and that now they are harvesting the results.
When we turn back the clock, we see that the main problem from east to west and from north to south – indeed for the entire world – is the founding of the state of Israel. It is a terrorist state of the highest degree, which the West implanted to be both a fork in the advancement of the Arab states and a policeman to the region, so that no state could breathe but by way of the Zionist enemy, the enemy of all nations. Yet who can antagonize Israel without antagonizing the Semites?
The West's first plans began with the creation of the Iran-Iraq War by way of its first hireling Saddam Hussein, who destroyed the Arab World and lost all prestige and dignity. The war lasted eight years, exhausted both sides and killed hundreds of thousands – and it was followed by the occupation of Kuwait and Muslim genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina. And how did the Arab League respond? Only by censuring criticism and occupying Iraq in 2003. In spite of it being an energy producer, Iraq still has an electricity crisis, as if the clock had been turned back tens of years. Similarly, Libya was destroyed, turned into chaos, and is full of weapons and insurgents. They proudly send Arab fighters to support the people of Libya, yet what did the Libyans gain? Here, oil is legitimate blood money, and it is France's gift for standing up for and loving the Libyan people.
After that, the crisis expanded into Syria, the last of the fortified castles; yet it did not reach Damascus, the ruined gateway to the Arab world. Instead, it found the city closed to any compromise or proposal for a peaceful solution, as if the crisis were not one of an Arab state. Unfortunately, Damascus became an obstacle for the majority of Arab states.
Whoever wants a peaceful solution does not send arms and huge sums of money, nor do they arm and pay mercenaries to kill an entire people – which is the pretense for eliminating the Syrian regime. What we are seeing now is the complete elimination of the Syrian Arab Republic, both its army and its people.
We are watching the massacre of the Free Syrian Army and the slaughter of innocents. Is this the government that we want?
Some of the Arabs' hands are stained with innocent blood due to their obstinacy, betrayal and conspiring. Are these the signs of the hour?