Russian Intervention Exposes 60-Member Coalition

Russian military intervention has impacted the hunt for remnants of terrorist organizations in Syria and has attacked Syrian infrastructure. The facts on the ground collide with the supposed axis formed by the United States, which claims victories and progress there and in Iraq.

After the Russian military intervention, the role of the 60-member alliance led by Washington appears different. Although it is diligently and slowly hunting members of the Islamic State without targeting Syrian infrastructure, the alliance has nevertheless not given up stalling and extorting with its arsenal of Zionist-American schemes and conspiracies in Iraq and Syria. This means that the Russian military intervention may uncover the truth of those schemes that serve as the fig leaf over Iraq and Syria.

No one can deny that the Russian military intervention and cooperation with the Syrian Arab Army serves the Syrian regime at its core. Its great achievements, which include hitting power, communication and operation centers much to the terrorists’ satisfaction, particularly help al-Qaida and insure an Islamic State group victory through the joint Russian-Syrian air strikes. It also paves the way for progress on the ground by the Syrian Arab Army, which has led to a radical change in the rules of engagement as the Syrian army continues to build on its successes. The implications mean the clearing of villages and towns once besieged by terrorist organizations along with the restoration of security and safety.

There is no doubt that Russian military intervention strongly supports the Syrian Arab Army’s progress on the field. Furthermore, we see that America’s 60-member alliance against the Islamic State group in Iraq has led to a division along Turkish-Syrian ethnic boundaries and the formation of a pocket and base for Islamic State group operations in Iraq. Because of terrorist control over border crossings, it is easy to pump in funds, weapons and terrorists. While the Iraqi sky is supposedly filled with the U.S. coalition, and its military can destroy Islamic State group’s stores of oil and arms, the destruction of the infrastructure financing this organization would expose the truth about America’s 60-member coalition, which it would rather not reveal to the media.

Therefore, Russia’s large military intervention during the first four months bothers the United States, which is forced to undertake military operations against the Islamic State group perhaps to alleviate its embarrassment, avoid exposure, provide an avenue for the Iraqi government in its war against the Islamic State group, and to undo intelligence cooperation between Iraq, Iran, Syria and Russia. Despite the dozens of air raids in Iraq and Syria that were nonexistent before the Russian intervention in Syria and Washington’s announcement that it targeted Islamic State group leaders, oil reserves and weapons areas, the United States and its intelligence organizations undoubtedly have sufficient intelligence and the coordinates to target those leaders along with their funding and infrastructure.