The Tear and Amendment to the Gun Law

Published in Publico
(Portugal) on 5 January 2016
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jane Dorwart. Edited by Melanie Rehfuss.
The North American president appeared this Tuesday in the White House surrounded by people whose families had in some way been victims of gun violence. It was at a press conference hosted by Mark Barden, whose son Daniel was killed in 2012 in the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School, where he uttered the phrase, "Every time I think about those kids [such as Daniel] it gets me mad." Barack Obama, who has long fought without great success against America's strongest lobbying group, the gun lobby, could not manage to control his emotions and shed a tear of frustration, impotency and rage.

Obama knows he not only has the power of the National Rifle Association and the Republican resistance against him, but also the 1791 law, resulting from the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which protects the right of Americans to have firearms, with little or no control.

And it is this control, which the majority Republican Congress has always refused, that Obama is now trying to circumvent with executive actions, adopting a series of measures restricting the sale and carrying of arms in the United States. "I also believe we can find ways to reduce gun violence consistent with the Second Amendment."

It's a pathway that Republicans promise to make as impassible as possible. Already this Tuesday, Paul Ryan pointed out that the next president could reverse an executive action, accusing that "rather than focus on criminals and terrorists," Obama is pursuing "law-abiding citizens." But this is a law with that people like Mark Barden do not understand. Obama has already countered with the following well-argued statement: The number of Americans who have died because of terrorism since Sept. 11 is fewer than 100. There are tens of thousands who die every year because of gun violence. One of those is Daniel.


A lágrima e a emenda à lei das armas

O Presidente norte-americano apareceu nesta terça-feira na Casa Branca rodeado por pessoas que tiveram, na sua família, algum elemento vítima de violência com armas. E foi apresentado na conferência de imprensa por Mark Barden, cujo filho Daniel foi morto em 2012, no massacre na escola primária de Sandy Hook. Quando disse esta frase — “sempre que penso nessas crianças [como o Daniel], fico chateado” —, Barack Obama não conseguiu conter a emoção e derramou uma lágrima de frustração, de impotência, de raiva, de quem há muito luta sem grande sucesso contra um dos mais fortes grupos de pressão americanos, o lobby das armas.
Obama sabe que tem contra si não só o poder da National Rifle Association e a resistência dos republicanos como também uma lei de 1791, que resulta da Segunda Emenda à Constituição e que protege o direito de os americanos terem armas de fogo, com pouco ou nenhum controlo.
É esse controlo, que o Congresso, de maioria republicana, sempre recusou, que Obama tenta agora contornar com acções executivas, tendo aprovado uma série de medidas de restrição à venda e porte de armas nos Estados Unidos. “Acredito que poderemos encontrar caminhos para poder reduzir a violência provocada pelas armas que sejam consistentes com a Segunda Emenda.”
Um caminho que os republicanos prometem tornar o mais ínvio possível, e nesta terça-feira Paul Ryan já veio lembrar que uma acção executiva poderá ser revertida pelo próximo Presidente, acusando Obama de, “em vez de manter o foco nos terroristas e criminosos”, perseguir “os cidadãos cumpridores da lei”. Uma lei que pessoas como Mark Barden não percebem e um argumento que Obama já rebateu, e bem: o número de americanos que morreram por causa de terrorismo depois do 11 de Setembro é inferior a cem. E são dezenas de milhares os que todos os anos morrem por causa da violência com armas de fogo. Um deles é Daniel.


This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

China: White House Peddling Snake Oil as Medicine

Kenya: Donald Trump Likely To ‘Ignore’ Africa

Israel: Jimmy Carter: The Best US President Israelis Ever Had

Turkey: 3 Styles of US Foreign Policy: Obama, Biden and Trump