An Unsettling Mood in the South China Sea on the Brink of Conflict

Published in World Journal
(China) on 14 July 2016
by Lin Ting Yao (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kartoa Chow. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
After the South China Sea issue entered arbitration, the U.S. and Japan used it in Southeast Asia to contain China, and the U.S. and South Korea deployed the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system in Northeast Asia, intensifying conflicts between China and the U.S, while an arms race between the countries around the South China Sea unfolded. The South China Sea matter entered a strange world in an unsettling and tense mood, and a potential “arsenal” full of warships and oil tankers.

After the Cold War, no great military powers emerged around the South China Sea; China and the countries in Southeast Asia lived in harmony for 20 years. Then, beginning in 2009, the U.S. noticed China’s rapid development of its naval and air forces in the South China Sea, with new models of destroyers and nuclear submarines going into service there. The U.S. took notice, and therefore shifted its strategic focus from the Middle East to East Asia.

When the U.S. declared the Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy, the South China Sea bade farewell to the post-Cold War power vacuum. The U.S. was worried about China expanding its military force, especially the expansion of a submarine base at Hainan Island, a home port to the latest diesel-electric submarines and nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Throughout the South China Sea arbitration, the U.S. challenged China’s “historical theory of rights.”

From land rights to maritime expansion, China has faced containment from the U.S., Japan, and the Philippines, which directly and indirectly contributed to the escalation of the South China Sea conflict as the U.S. and China’s open confrontation and even regional conflicts have become worrisome. In addition, the countries around the South China Sea are now also entering the arms race. Before the end of 2010, India, South Korea, and Vietnam each purchased six submarines, while Australia also planned to purchase 12 new submarines within 20 years. And before the end of 2020, the number of submarines China will have in the Pacific Ocean will exceed that of the United States Pacific Fleet.

This is an omen for the countries in the Asia-Pacific region. A military conflict is brewing in the South China Sea, and with military activities in this maritime territory becoming more frequent, occasional confrontations sparking conflicts are more probable, thus creating an “Asian arsenal.”


進入後南海仲裁階段,美日在東南亞以南海仲裁圍堵中國,美韓在東北亞部署「薩德」(THAAD)反導系統,使中美衝突趨於激化,加上南海周邊國家展開軍備競賽,南海將進入一個氣氛詭譎、劍拔弩張的怪異世界,一個擠滿了軍艦與油輪的潛在「火藥庫」。

冷戰結束後,南海周邊不見軍事強權,中國與東南亞國家和平相處了20年。直到2009年,美國有鑑於中國在南海的海空軍力迅猛發展,新型大型驅逐艦、核潛艦投入南海服役,讓美國有所警覺,並將戰略重心從中東轉移到東亞。

當美國宣稱「亞太再平衡」戰略時,南海告別了冷戰後的權力真空。美國擔心中國擴張軍事武力,尤其海南島擴建潛艦基地,部署最新型的柴電潛艦及核子彈道飛彈潛艦的母港。遂透過南海仲裁案挑戰中國的「歷史權利論」。

中國從陸權向海上擴張,遇上美日菲的圍堵戰略,已直接間接促成南海問題升溫,中美演變成公開衝突甚至局部戰爭已令人擔憂。此外,當前南海周邊國家都進入軍備競賽。在2010年末以前,印度、南韓和越南已各自購置六艘潛艦,澳洲也將在20年內購買12艘新潛艦;而且在2020年末以前,中國在西太平洋的軍艦數量將超過美國太平洋艦隊。

這是讓亞太周邊國家不安的前兆。南海正醞釀一場軍事衝突,這片海域裡的軍事動作愈頻繁,偶爾碰撞引發擦槍走火的衝突就愈高,醞釀形成「亞洲火藥庫」。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

China: Blind Faith in US ‘Security Commitments’ Is Short-Sighted

Germany: Trump’s Tariffs: China Acts, Europe Reacts

Australia: What’s Behind Donald Trump’s Latest Crypto Adventure?

Sri Lanka: As Albanese Stands Tall, Let’s Stand by Her

Topics

Spain: The New American Realism

Mexico: Trump vs. Cuba: More of the Same

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

Israel: Epstein Conspiracy: When the Monster Has a Life of Its Own and Rises Up

Spain: Another Threat from Trump

Canada: Negotiating a Business Deal without Trust

Taiwan: Tariff Showdown Doesn’t Shake Confidence

Related Articles

Germany: Trump’s Tariffs: China Acts, Europe Reacts

Australia: As Trump Turns His Back on Renewables, China Is Building the Future

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Indonesia: US-China: Tariff, Tension, and Truce

Japan: Iran Ceasefire Agreement: The Danger of Peace by Force