On Trump’s Road to Reelection, the Problem Isn’t the Economy

Published in UDN
(Taiwan) on 1 February 2020
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
In the 1992 presidential election, former President Bill Clinton coined an important saying, “It’s the economy, stupid.” After Clinton won, the phrase became the slogan of economists around the world. This year, as Donald Trump competes for reelection, will the U.S. economy be a roadblock to his victory? The situation is possibly the opposite: “(If he’s not reelected,) it’s not the economy, stupid.”

Let us first look at critical monetary policy. Many believe that during an election year, the Federal Reserve will probably not raise interest rates. While this is not set in stone, the outcome of a meeting on Jan. 29 by the Federal Open Market Committee indicated that currently, the Fed’s policies will remain moderate. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell disclosed similar information in a statement after the meeting and during a press conference. First, the only change announced in the statement was that household spending had eased from strong to moderate. Discerning individuals can easily how profound this is.

Second, since last October, the Fed has been buying $60 billion worth of short-term Treasury debt every month. Its public reasoning is that it wants to increase bank deposit reserves and ease the pressure of short-term interest rate increases — not that it is returning to the practice of quantitative easing to lower long-term interest rates. However, to those in the market, that’s quantitative easing as long as the Fed buys Treasury bills. Once funding from the Fed enters the market, it can guide the market flow, but cannot determine the final outcome.

Next, the Fed once again raised the interest rate on excess reserves from 1.55% to 1.60%, indicating that it will resume purchasing debt. This, along with involvement in repurchase operations, has successfully pushed bank reserves back into the financial system, decreasing the risk that short-term interest rates will soar once again. The Fed will continue purchasing Treasury bills at least until the end of June, giving financial markets a sense of security.

Powell mentioned that the coronavirus outbreak may affect economic growth, and reiterated that the Fed is concerned that the U.S. inflation rate remains below the 2% target. Trends in interest rate futures also indicate that according to market predictions, there is a slight chance the Fed will decrease interest rates by one point within the year. Therefore, 2020 will be a “dull” year for the Fed, the most probable situation being that it will not change interest rates. Still, the chance it will decrease interest rates is greater than the chance it will increase rates, especially if the coronavirus outbreak spreads and broadly affects the global economy, in which case the Fed might enact further easing.

Next, let’s look at economic performance. Although executive confidence levels are at a 10-year low and investment is weak, the unemployment rate, which voters most care about, is at 3.5% — a 50-year low — and many working age adults have returned to the labor force. Most wages have increased by around 3%, inflation remains below 2% and real wages have maintained growth.

Since Trump came into office, economic performance has been barely passable. The main driving force has not been tax cuts and deregulation to stimulate corporate investment, but rather increased government spending. Congress has agreed that the amount of increased public spending by the Trump administration to stimulate economic growth is more than three times that of Barack Obama’s administration. In 2020, Trump is again preparing to throw money around, this time with the participation of the Democrats. This May, the federal government will undertake the once-in-a-decade population census. The census is estimated to employ 400,000 temporary workers, which will fire up the market. Thus, if the 2020 presidential election is based on bread-and-butter issues, it will favor Trump’s reelection.

Trump’s most controversial trade policy so far is the relaxing of policy agreements since the end of last year. The U.S. and China have already signed phase one of a trade agreement, and phase two trade talks will soon begin. The new U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement was recently signed, and trade conflicts between the U.S. and E.U. appear to be easing. Although Trump’s trade policies have always been erratic, particularly during negotiations with China, he is, after all, a businessman. All of his policies and operations have been devised to get him reelected. Even though the U.S. economy is only maintaining trends in long-term growth, it remains a leader in the developed world. Rather than stirring up trouble, it is better to retain this position of leadership by practicing restraint.

According to the latest monthly poll by the Financial Times and the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, 51% of respondents believe Trump’s policies have “strongly” helped the economy. Moreover, since this poll began last October, approval ratings for the Trump administration’s economic performance have increased. Low interest rates, a better housing market and a strong stock market may have all been factors affecting voter optimism.

Trump’s relaxed monetary policies and a strong employment rate can, at a minimum, satisfy voters’ most basic demands. Consumer participation will sustain economic growth, and the trade war has temporarily ceased. Therefore, at least economic problems won’t slow Trump down on the road to reelection.


美國前總統柯林頓1992年競選時,提出的主要口號之一是「笨蛋,問題在經濟(It's the economy, stupid)」;柯林頓勝選後,這句話也成為全球政經界人士的口頭禪。今年川普要競選連任,美國經濟是否會成為路障?情況可能正相反,應該是「笨蛋,(連任如果失敗),問題將不在經濟」。

先看最關鍵的貨幣政策。許多人士認為大選年聯準會(Fed)「應該」不會升息,這雖然不是一項鐵律,但從Fed聯邦公開市場委員會(FOMC)29日會議的結果顯示,Fed目前的政策立場是「中性偏鴿」,在會後聲明及主席鮑爾的記者會談話中都透露出此種訊息。首先,會後聲明只有一項變動,就是對家庭支出的評估從之前的「強勁」成長,改為「溫和」成長,明眼人很容易就能看出其中玄機。

其次,Fed從去年10月開始每月購買600億美元短債,公開的理由是要拉高銀行存款準備金的水位,緩和短期利率上升的壓力,而不是恢復量化寬鬆(QE)政策,以壓低長期利率;但在市場人士眼裡,只要Fed砸錢買債,就是QE;Fed新資金一旦進入市場,便只能引導,而無法干預最終流向。

再者,Fed這次又將銀行超額準備金存款利率從1.55%提高到1.60%,顯示Fed既恢復購債,又積極進行附買回操作附買回操,已成功地將銀行準備金推回到金融體系,短期利率再度飆高的風險下降;但Fed至少在6月底前仍繼續購債,讓金融市場吃下了定心丸。

鮑爾更提到武漢肺炎爆發可能影響經濟成長,並重申Fed擔心美國通膨率一直低於2%目標;利率期貨走勢也顯示市場預期今年內Fed可能降息1碼的機率稍稍提高。因此2020年對Fed而言將是「無聊的一年」,最可能的情況是不會改變利率;但降息的可能性大於升息;尤其是武漢肺炎衝擊如果擴大,並廣泛影響全球經濟,Fed仍可能進一步寬鬆。

再看經濟表現。儘管企業主管的信心降到十年來低點,投資疲軟,但選民最關心的失業率仍僅有3.5%,為50年來低點,許多工作年齡的成年人又重返職場;一般勞工時薪年增3%上下,通膨率仍低於2%,實質薪資維持正成長。

川普上任以來經濟表現能夠差強人意,主要的動能並不是減稅及法規鬆綁以激勵企業投資,而是靠政府支出不斷堆高;國會同意川普政府擴大公共支出以刺激經濟成長的金額,比歐巴馬任內多出三倍以上。2020年川普又準備撒錢,民主黨也共襄盛舉。今年5月聯邦政府將實施十年一次的人口普查,預估將雇用40萬名臨時人員,市場又將火上澆油。因此2020年美國的大選如果還是一次「荷包選舉」,對川普的連任之路將相當有利。

川普迄今最受爭議的貿易政策,去年底以來便由緊轉鬆。美中已簽署第一階段貿易協定,第二階段談判也將展開;美墨加新協定已於近日簽字,美歐貿易衝突也出現和緩訊號。川普以往的貿易政策雖反覆無常,尤其是美中談判,但他畢竟是「生意人」,一切的政策與操作都是為了「連任」。現在美國經濟成長雖只維持長期趨勢水準,但仍執已開發世界之牛耳;與其再興風作浪,遠不如持盈保泰。

依據英國金融時報與彼得森基金會的每月選情最新民調指出,51%的受訪者相信川普的政策對經濟帶來「強勁」助力,而且從去年10月開始做這項調查以來,支持川普政府經濟表現的比率持續上升,而低利率、房市好轉及股市強勁,都可能是選民對經濟樂觀的原因。

川普既有寬鬆貨幣政策保駕護航,就業強勁至少能滿足選民「小確幸」的最低要求,消費熱絡將維持經濟溫和成長,貿易戰也暫時停火,因此經濟問題至少不會在連任之路上拖他的後腿

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture