Trade Relation Diplomacy: Taiwan’s Last Path to the World Trade Organization

Published in UDN
(Taiwan) on 17 January 2021
by Franz Chen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Jamye Sharp.
With less than a month remaining in the 37th year of the 60-year lunar calendar cycle, the world is still bearing witness to unexpected historical events. On the morning of Jan. 6, U.S. time, Congress convened to certify the results of the election while the whole world waited for a surprise move by Donald Trump. No one thought, however, that Trump supporters from across the country would take over the Capitol, a symbol of American democracy.

These events drew collective ridicule from countries that are unfamiliar with or have been harmed by the double standards of American democracy. Mohamad Safa, the Lebanese representative to the United Nations, capped off the criticism with his tweet: “If the United States saw what the United States is doing in the United States, the United States would invade the United States to liberate the United States from the tyranny of the United States.”

Naturally, Western countries that stand on the side of democracy with the U.S. strongly condemned the events, clearly expressing their worry and anger at the riot that could shake Western democracy. Even British Prime Minister Boris Johnson described the events as “disgraceful scenes.”

As Taiwanese, we cannot look on merrily from afar. On the contrary — these “disgraceful scenes” are like a long-overdue look into a magic mirror that clearly reflects the disgusting state of Taiwan’s democracy. As the U.S. federal government steps up the search for and indictment of the thugs who trampled through the Capitol, this magic mirror reflects Taiwan’s bleak international status. At a moment when democratic countries across the globe stand against a common enemy, we have no standing to uphold justice for democracy. For one, we, too, have foolishly trampled through parliament. Moreover, in the post-Trump era, expectations remain that Taiwan will be used in anti-China politics.

It’s not difficult for us to realize that not only has Taiwan been rejected from international trade integration, but we have even lost our standing regarding universal values agreed upon by the international community. Thus, compared with the U.S., we should be even more concerned about our bleak status. In the wake of the U.S. riot, Joe Biden might be out of danger; the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, however, may throw Taiwan into harm’s way. No matter how many people in Taiwan pretend everything is going well and try to create an environment where industry is not impacted by these two agreements, entrepreneurial businesses, both large and small, on the front lines of industry and commerce have long felt the sting of the shifting situation. Furthermore, if these two agreements are really not worth mentioning, why are countries important to the international industrial chain scrambling to join?

Taiwan has indeed faced blockades to international politics and diplomacy. Our places of foreign exchange are often called “economic” or “cultural” units, as Taiwan once relied on Chinese culture to achieve success. Moreover, Taiwanese businesspeople all over the world have contributed considerably to diplomacy. In sum, trade relations have long been used to manage Taiwan’s foreign relations. Because Taiwan can persuade people with culture while gaining justice through benefits, even though blockades are everywhere, we are not an isolated island. Instead, we have a place in the global economy.

It’s a shame that in the past few years, for a variety of reasons, we have gradually veered off the stable track of diplomacy through trade relations and instead begun walking a dangerous and deadly tightrope. Since Taiwan is incompatible with the rest of the world in terms of regional integration and international consensus, I think Taiwan must change its bleak status and once more embrace trade relation diplomacy to obtain both justice and benefits — a possible path to joining the World Trade Organization.

The author is the founding chair of the Asia Pacific Cultural and Creative Industries Association.


商道,台灣最後的入世之道

六十年一遇農曆庚子年還剩不到一月,世界依然充滿見證歷史的回馬槍。美國時間六日早上國會召開認證投票結果聯席會議,全球都在坐等川普有何驚人之舉,沒想到來自全美的川粉,攻陷象徵美國民主的國會山莊。

此舉引發許多看不慣或深受美式「民主雙標」禍害國家集體奚落,其中黎巴嫩駐聯合國代表穆罕默德.薩法(Mohamad Safa)推特發文,稱「美國若是看到美國正在對美國做的事,一定會入侵美國,然後從美國暴政中解放美國」,堪稱點睛之言。

當然,和美國站在民主陣線的西方諸國紛紛嚴詞譴責,明確流露他們對於這場暴亂可能撼動西方民主的憂慮憤慨,就連英國首相強生都形容,「可恥的景象」。

身為台灣人,我們不可能隔岸稱慶,相反地,這場「可恥的景象」如同一面遲來已久的魔鏡,真實照映出台灣民主近十年來面目的可憎。隨著美國政府進一步加強搜捕,並加重控告這些踐踏國會的暴徒,這面魔鏡同時照映出台灣國際地位的淒涼身影。在全球民主國家同仇敵愾時刻,我們也沒有立場為民主風範伸張正義,一是我們也曾經同樣醜態百出地踐踏國會;二是對後川普時代以台抗中路線尚存期待。

我們不難發現,台灣除在國際經貿整合上被拒門外,現在連國際社會關於普世價值共識上,都失去立身之地。因此,比起美國,我們更應關心台灣淒涼身影,隨著美國暴亂收尾,可能讓拜登之路轉危為安,然而RCEP以及CPTPP,卻可能讓台灣之路轉安而危。無論國內有多少聲音粉飾太平,企圖營造產業不受這兩項條約衝擊氛圍,可是身處工商國貿前線的大小企業家們,早感受到局勢變化的凜冽;再者,如果這兩項條約真無足掛懷,何以全球產業鏈中重要國家,都前仆後繼爭相加入?

誠然,台灣一直面臨國際政治與外交上的截堵,我們對外交流單位多冠以經濟與文化名號,一來中華文化的確曾經是台灣手上幾乎無往不利的敲門磚,二則遍布天下台商也為縱橫捭闔的外交助益良多,簡言之,過去長期採取「商道」概念,經營台灣對外關係。一方面以文服人、另一面以利取義,所以縱使截堵處處,台灣並未成為孤島,反而在全球經濟中占得一席之地。

可惜近年來因為種種原因,我們逐漸偏離過去「商道外交」平穩軌道,走上一條甘為俎上肉的危險鋼索。既然台灣在區域整合與國際共識上,皆顯得與世界格格不入,吾以為台灣有必要轉過我們淒涼身影,重新擁抱商道外交義利兼得,或為一條可攻可守的入世之道。

作者為亞太文化創意產業協會創會理事長
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Austria: Donald Trump’s Breakneck Test of US Democracy

Turkey: America Is on Pins and Needles: Who Will Win?

U.K.: The Guardian View on Donald Trump’s Industrial Policy: Inward Turn by Ultimatum

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Taiwan: A Brief Look at Trump’s Global Profit Grab