OPD 9 Dec 2024, edited by Helaine Schweitzer, proofing in progress

US Reduction of Quantitative Easing: Strive To Normalize Risk Assessment

Published in Sankei News
(Japan) on 7 November 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dorothy Phoenix. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
A switchover from monetary policies introduced as an emergency response to the COVID-19 crisis is underway. After November, the U.S. Federal Reserve will gradually begin to curtail monetary quantitative easing measures through which it had been injecting large amounts of money into the market.

In the U.S., the business climate quickly recovered as economic activity resumed. Recently, if anything, prices continue to rise, as supply fails to keep up with soaring demand.

The decision to phase out the monetary easement is reasonable, based on such economic trends. In contrast, Japan cannot help but continue its large-scale economic easement, as economic recovery is slow and concerns about deflation remain.

However, the board's change in policy will have a worldwide influence, so caution is necessary. In the U.S., If the trend toward buying the U.S. dollar in anticipation of increasing interest rates gains strength, there is concern that capital will flow out of developing nations, devaluing their currencies.

Japan is not immune from the situation. If the price of imports increases, accelerating the strengthening of the dollar and the weakening of the yen, then that change coupled with the high cost of crude oil could deal a devastating blow to the economic climate, which is already slow to recover.

We hope that the Fed will work to normalize its monetary policies, while being careful to avoid ushering in worldwide chaos. We would like to see thorough consideration given to the pace of this move to curb quantitative easing, of course, as well as a focus on the rising interest rates and the foreign and domestic economic climate.

Last March, the board introduced two measures: a quantitative easing policy, meant to buy U.S. Treasury securities and inject capital into the market, and an effective 0% interest rate policy. It was an extraordinary large-scale relief move meant to support an economy hobbled by the COVID-19 crisis.

The decision was made to gradually reduce the amount of asset purchases, which had been $120 billion a month, or roughly 13.7 trillion yen. If the economic recovery continues at a good pace, then by the midpoint of next year, the purchases will cease.

One more 0% interest policy rate will remain in place in the meantime. Some might judge that the move toward tightening credit to lift this measure and raise interest rates is premature, but the board will soon have to make a difficult decision about when to raise the rates.

The board must not be too slow to raise interest rates and hasten inflation, but at the same time, it must also not move in haste and plunge the market into a relapse. The U.S. is facing high commodity prices, in part because of supply chain limitations due to logistical stagnation resulting from COVID-19, as well as difficulties in procuring materials. It is necessary to carefully examine how long this situation can drag out. We hope that Fed Chair Jerome Powell will strive to continue to thoroughly communicate information to the market, taking all of these points into account.


米が量的緩和縮小 リスク見極め正常化図れ

新型コロナウイルス禍で導入された危機対応型の金融政策からの転換である。米連邦準備制度理事会(FRB)が11月から、市場に大量の資金を流す量的金融緩和策を段階的に縮小する。

米国では経済活動の再開で景気が急速に回復した。最近はむしろ、高まる需要に供給が追い付かず、物価高が進んでいる。

こうした経済動向を踏まえて量的緩和の縮小を決めた判断は妥当だ。景気回復が遅く、デフレ懸念も残るため大規模緩和を継続せざるを得ない日本とは異なる。

ただし、FRBの政策変更が世界に及ぼす影響には警戒が必要である。米国の金利が高くなるとみてドルを買う動きが強まれば、新興国などの資金が流出して通貨安につながる恐れがある。

日本も対岸の火事ではいられない。ドル高円安が加速して輸入物価が上がれば、折からの原油高とも相まって、回復が遅れている景気に打撃を与えかねない。

FRBに求めたいのは、世界に混乱を招かぬよう注意して金融政策の正常化を図ることだ。量的緩和の縮小ペースはもちろん、今後の焦点である利上げについても国内外の経済情勢を十分に見極めて判断してもらいたい。

FRBは昨年3月、米国債などを買い入れて市場に資金を流す量的緩和策と、事実上のゼロ金利政策の2つを導入した。コロナ禍で落ち込んだ経済を支えるための異例の大規模緩和である。

このうち量的緩和について、月額で1200億ドル(約13兆7千億円)の資産購入額を徐々に減らしていくことを決めた。景気回復が順調に続けば、来年半ばには資産の購入が終了する。

もう一つのゼロ金利政策は当面維持する。これを解除して利上げへと転じる本格的な金融引き締めは時期尚早という判断だが、FRBは今後、いつ利上げするかという難しい判断が迫られる。

利上げが遅れてインフレを加速させるわけにはいかないが、前のめりに動いて景気を腰折れさせてもいけない。米国の物価高は、コロナ禍に伴う物流停滞や部材の調達難などの「供給制約」に起因する部分がある。それがどれほど長引くかも慎重に見極める必要がある。FRBのパウエル議長には今後、こうした点を踏まえた上で市場に対する丁寧な情報発信を続けるよう努めてもらいたい。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Brazil: Perplexity, Skepticism, Desperation

Russia: ‘Have Fun’*

Russia: Obama Has Escaped a False START

Mexico: Binational Crime

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Japan: Trump’s Comeback to the US Presidency: Gaza Citizens’ Thoughts

Taiwan: Effects of Tariffs Need Attention

Japan: Trump Administration: Do Not Overlook Hegemony

Japan: Return of Trump Signals Setback in Efforts on Climate Change

Japan: Polls Again Failed To Accurately Predict Trump’s Sweeping Victory