With Justices under Suspicion, the US Supreme Court Will Rule on Trump Immunity*

Published in Folha
(Brazil) on 6/12/2024
by Lúcia Guimarães (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jane Dorwart. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
The highest court in the land has been making headlines as it faces allegations of corruption and Christian nationalism.

“There are days that I’ve come to my office after an announcement of a case and closed my door and cried.”

Such a revelation is unusual in that it was made at a recent lecture by Sonia Sotomayor, the liberal minority justice on the U.S. Supreme Court. Sotomayor commented on what she called the trauma of the impact of the ever more radical decisions of the solid conservative majority, such as the elimination of legal abortion two years ago.**

The highest court in the U.S. has recently been in the headlines as it faces allegations of corruption and Christian nationalism, concentrated on two of possibly the most obfuscatory justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas — Thomas trailed by notoriety since his 1991 confirmation hearing when law professor Anita Hill accused him sexual harassment.

National polls in 2023 showed that the level of American distrust of the court’s nine justices reached a historic high. The justices hold lifetime appointments and do not answer to any other institution. Chief Justice John Roberts recently refused a request by the Senate Judiciary Committee testify about Alito and Thomas' glaring conflicts of interest.

Last November, Roberts made just one concession, releasing a declaration of ethical principles of conduct which, because they are voluntary, are worthless. The code was announced after the first scandalous revelations about how Thomas has been fattened like a pig for decades with luxurious trips and gifts from billionaire friend Harlan Crow, who currently has a financial interest in four cases before the court.

Thomas is not the only one to sully the robe, just the most blatant. He has been accused of receiving gifts totaling more than $4 million over the past two decades. He refused to recuse himself from cases related to an attempted coup d’etat to prevent the certification of Joe Biden’s election in January 2021, although his fanatical wife, Ginni, was in Washington on the afternoon of the Capitol invasion texting the house speaker imploring her to sabotage the certification of Electoral College votes to keep Trump in power.***

The New York Times reported in May that, after the attack on the Capitol, an inverted American flag associated with the insurrection was flown in front of Alito’s residence. He blamed his wife, Martha-Ann, but he lied about his involvement, because soon after, the Times reported that another extremist flag used by people who attacked the Capitol had been flying for months outside the Alitos’ beach house in New Jersey.

A flag is not a shirt. Alito does not have the impartiality, much less the moral stature, to rule on the most important case facing the court this session. The court is expected to rule this month whether Trump, accused of multiple federal and state crimes, including charges related to the attempted insurrection, is immune from prosecution.

A Democratic activist passing as a conservative at a gathering this week secretly recorded Samuel and Martha-Ann Alito admitting their radical views, homophobic attitudes and resentment of most Americans who believe in the constitutional separation of church and state.

About his vision of the country, Justice Alito had several unbridled things to say. In response to a need to return the country to a state of godliness, he said, “I agree … One side or the other is going to win. … [T]here are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised.”

*Editor’s Note: This article is available in its original language with a paid subscription.

**Editor’s Note: The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson overturned Roe v. Wade, overturning constitutional protections at the federal level, but giving individual states the right to determine the legality of abortion.

***Editor’s Note: The author’s allegations that Ginni Thomas reached out to the house speaker on Jan. 6, 2021 are unverified.



Com juízes sob suspeita, Suprema Corte dos EUA vai decidir sobre imunidade de Trump
Instância máxima da Justiça americana tem frequentado manchetes com denúncias de corrupção e nacionalismo cristão


Houve dias em que cheguei no escritório depois do anúncio de uma nova decisão, fechei a porta e chorei."

O desabafo é incomum por ter sido feito numa palestra recente por Sonia Sotomayor, a juíza da minoria liberal da Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos. Sotomayor comentou o que chamou de trauma do impacto de decisões cada vez mais radicais da sólida maioria conservadora, como a abolição do aborto legal, há dois anos.

Nas últimas semanas, o tribunal máximo da Justiça dos EUA tem frequentado manchetes com denúncias de corrupção e nacionalismo cristão, concentradas nos dois talvez mais obscurantistas magistrados, Samuel Alito e Clarence Thomas —este, acompanhado por infâmia desde as célebres audiências de confirmação, em 1991, quando foi acusado de assédio sexual pela professora de direito Anita Hill.

Pesquisas nacionais, de 2023, confirmam uma alta histórica na desconfiança dos americanos nos nove juízes da Corte. Eles têm cargo vitalício e não respondem a qualquer outra instituição. O presidente da Corte, John Roberts, acaba de recusar um pedido do Comitê de Justiça do Senado para comparecer a uma sessão e responder perguntas sobre gritantes conflitos de interesses de Alito e Thomas.

Em novembro passado, Roberts só fez uma concessão, emitindo uma declaração de princípios éticos de conduta que, por serem voluntários, de nada valem. Os princípios foram anunciados após as primeiras revelações escandalosas sobre Thomas, engordado como um suíno há décadas com viagens luxuosas e presentes pelo amigo bilionário Harlan Crow, que tem, no momento, interesse financeiro em quatro casos diante da Corte.
Thomas não é o único a avacalhar a toga, só o mais ousado –recebeu mimos que somam mais de US$ 4 milhões nas últimas duas décadas. Ele se recusa a se abster de julgar casos relacionados à tentativa de golpe de Estado para impedir a posse de Joe Biden, em janeiro de 2021, embora sua fanática mulher, Ginni, tenha passado a tarde da invasão do Capitólio mandando mensagens de texto para o então presidente da Câmara, suplicando que ele sabotasse a confirmação dos votos do Colégio Eleitoral para manter Donald Trump no poder.
Em maio, o jornal The New York Times revelou que, após a invasão do Capitólio, uma bandeira americana invertida, associada à insurreição, foi desfraldada na frente da residência de Samuel Alito. Ele botou a culpa na mulher, Martha-Ann, mas mentiu, porque logo depois o Times provou que outra bandeira extremista usada pelos invasores havia passado meses na porta da casa de praia do casal Alito, em Nova Jersey.
Uma bandeira não é uma camiseta. Samuel Alito não tem imparcialidade –muito menos estatura moral— para julgar o caso mais importante diante da corte: a decisão, esperada até o fim do mês, sobre a imunidade de Trump, acusado de múltiplos crimes federais e estaduais, entre eles, o de incitar a tentativa de golpe.

Nesta semana, uma ativista democrata se fez passar por conservadora numa festa e gravou em segredo Samuel e Martha-Ann Alito confessando todo seu radicalismo, homofobia e rancor pela maioria dos americanos que apoiam a separação entre igreja e Estado.
Sobre sua visão do país, estas foram algumas frases do destemperado juiz Alito: "Precisamos devolver o país à religiosidade"; "um lado vai ter que vencer"; "não dá para transigir".
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Topics

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Related Articles

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*