US Presidential Election: Both Parties Are Responsible for Preventing Chaos

Published in Kobe Shimbun
(Japan) on 19 October 2024
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dorothy Phoenix. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
There are fewer than 20 days in the U.S. presidential election until Election Day on Nov. 5. The back-and-forth battle between Democratic candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and Republican candidate former President Donald Trump has become a close contest.

The so-called “swing states” that have supporters for both candidates hold the key to the outcome of the race. Both camps have made repeated visits to seven of these states, including the “Rust Belt” Midwestern state of Michigan and the western state of Arizona, which shares a long border with Mexico.

Many citizens are suffering from the effects of inflation, and so they have a high level of concern about cost-of-living measures. Both candidates are competing to make campaign pledges such as measures to reduce the burden on household finances through tax reductions. Dealing with illegal immigrants from Central and South America and abortion rights are also major points at issue as well.

However, in the end, the biggest point that has come to the forefront in the campaign, in which personal attacks stand out more than policy debates, is whether Trump should be restored to office or stopped. The division in U.S. society, situated against a backdrop of widening disparity, appears to be intensifying the conflict about the sense of values that a nation ought to have.

Harris, a Black woman of Asian descent, is also a symbol of diversity. As befitting her origins as a public prosecutor, she has emphasized an attitude of defending the rule of law, freedom, and democracy. She says she is taking on President Joe Biden's policy of international cooperation.

The opposing Trump touts an “America First” policy. He appeals to many white conservatives, and during the election, he has repeatedly made statements encouraging deportation of immigrants, as well as sexist remarks. His supporters applaud him, even though it would come as no surprise if he had been disqualified after being found guilty in a criminal trial.*

During this election, foul-mouthed slanderous comments are flying around, and there have been many scenes in which it is difficult to understand whether it is a democratic superpower. Among other things, former President Trump bears a grave responsibility for inciting antagonism. However, the wildly enthusiastic support for “America First” should probably not be dismissed as a temporary boom.

It is disappointing that discussion concerning diplomacy and national security has not deepened, a reflection of the inward-facing orientation of U.S. society. Israel is spreading war in the Middle East, and the war in Ukraine is lengthening. What role will the U.S. play in accomplishing world peace, and how will it deepen and improve its relationships with allied nations such as Japan? It is critical that both candidates discuss these points more.

In the previous election of 2020, there were a string of voting obstructions in various places, due to factional antagonism. Not acknowledging his defeat, Trump incited his supporters to raid Congress in an extraordinary series of events. If such chaos happens again, faith in U.S. democracy will be damaged. The effect on the international community cannot be ignored either.

Both the Democratic and Republican candidates certainly must enforce a fair election, and they must fulfill their duties to ensure a peaceful transition of power. The eyes of the world will also be watching after the election is over.

*Editor's note: A guilty verdict would not have disqualified former President Trump from seeking another presidential term.


<社説>米大統領選/混乱阻止は両党の責務だ

米大統領選は、11月5日の投票まで20日を切った。民主党のハリス副大統領と共和党のトランプ前大統領の攻防は大接戦となっている。

 勝敗の鍵を握るのは、両党の支持が拮抗(きっこう)する「スイング・ステート(揺れる州)」だ。「ラストベルト(さびた工業地帯)」と呼ばれる中西部ミシガン州や、メキシコと長い国境を接する西部アリゾナ州などの7州がそれに当たり、両陣営とも現地入りを重ねる。

 インフレの後遺症に苦しむ国民は多く、物価対策への関心は高い。どちらの候補も減税による家計負担の軽減策など「ばらまき」的な公約を競い合う。中南米からの不法移民への対応や、人工妊娠中絶の是非も主要な争点である。

 しかし、政策論争よりも個人攻撃が目立つ選挙戦は、つまるところ「トランプの復活か阻止か」が最大の争点であることを浮き彫りにした。格差拡大を背景にした米社会の分断は、国家のあり方をめぐる価値観の対立を激化させているようだ。

 黒人女性でアジア系のハリス氏は、多様性の象徴でもある。検察官出身らしく、法の支配や自由、民主主義を守る姿勢を強調してきた。バイデン大統領の国際協調路線を引き継ぐとしている。

 対するトランプ氏は米国第一主義を掲げる。白人保守層を意識した訴えが多く、選挙中も移民排斥や女性蔑視の発言を繰り返している。刑事裁判で有罪評決を受けるなど一発退場となってもおかしくないが、支持者は拍手を送る。

 選挙では口汚い中傷も飛び交い、これが民主主義の超大国かと理解に苦しむ場面は多い。中でも対立をあおる前大統領の責任は重大だ。ただ、米国第一が熱狂的に支持される状況を、一時的なブームと軽視すべきではないだろう。

 米社会の内向き志向を反映して、外交や安全保障に関する議論が深まらないのは残念だ。イスラエルは中東に戦火を広げ、ウクライナ戦争は長期化している。世界の平和に米国がどのような役割を果たすのか、日本をはじめとする同盟国との関係をどう維持し深化させるのか。両候補はもっと語る必要がある。

 前回2020年の選挙では、党派対立から各地で投票妨害などが相次いだ。トランプ氏は敗北を認めず、支持者が連邦議会を襲撃する異常事態を招いた。混乱が繰り返されるようなことになれば、米国の民主主義への信頼は損なわれる。国際社会に与える影響も無視できない。

 民主、共和両党は、公正な選挙の実施はもち
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Austria: Donald Trump’s Breakneck Test of US Democracy

Turkey: America Is on Pins and Needles: Who Will Win?

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes