US Policy in Its New Islamist Flavor

The new U.S. policy lies in creating a shared issue and is working to inflame this issue and frame it in a way that serves to execute the United States’ political agenda. It has used this strategy throughout what is called the “Arab Spring.” The newspaper The Christian Science Monitor confirmed that the United States of America was not only an observer, an intervening actor or one side in the conflicts that occurred in the world, but rather that one of the results of the United States’ policy relating to fabricating the colored revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa, including financing and arming the takfiri fundamentalists in various countries, was a great increase in the fundamentalist terrorist groups well-trained in various kinds of combat and ready to carry out any task, whatever its type or place. The best example of this is Syria, which is now fighting with the efforts of a courageous army of more than 5000 takfiri terrorist combatants who have come to Syria from Yemen, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Sudan, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and other similar Arab and foreign countries, with direction from the United States, Western countries, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. This is what has been called the “Free Army,” and the German newspaper Die Welt confirmed that the percentage of Syrians in the “Free Syrian Army” is no more than 5 percent, while the largest number are from fundamentalist groups that come from Libya and African countries to carry out acts of terrorism in Syria with support and financing from Gulf petro-dollar sheikhs.

Concerning this, the United States and Western states are working to get rid of those takfiris present in the Arab Spring countries (Egypt, Tunisia, Libya) by eliminating them from those countries and sending them to Syria, in consideration that Syria neither applies U.S. democratic principles nor works to protect U.S. interests, in contrast to those countries that work to execute the U.S. political agenda without restrictions or conditions and whose regimes the Arab Spring protected. The devastation and killing that the Syrian arena is experiencing as a result of terrorist acts by armed gangs confirms that what is taking place is an Atlantic Spring aiming to strike the ummah and all of its peoples and bring it to its knees for long years to come, during which Washington, in coordination with Israel and its allies, will execute new arrangements in the region with Turkish support and Saudi-Qatari financing.

But the United States of America has started to reap the fruits of its labor — the fundamentalist groups it equipped have come to constitute a threat to its national security and likewise the security of the countries of the European Union, for they who send terrorism to a country will certainly find terrorism coming back to them.

The recent killing of the U.S. ambassador in the Libyan city of Benghazi and likewise the killing of a number of U.S. diplomats at the hands of takfiri terrorists, let alone the United States’ emergency evacuation of its citizens from a number of Islamic countries, emphasizes the truth of the warnings analysts and experts have been giving since the beginning of what is called “the Arab Spring.” They have been warning that the overthrow of the regimes allied with the United States will be reflected positively in the interest of the fundamentalists despite the Obama administration’s knowledge from the beginning that the fundamentalists do not have programs or plans to manage the stage after the toppling of regimes and that they will be forced to run after the United States so that it will support them. The United States would believe that it would have thus accomplished its goal of the utmost importance — namely, to have proved to the world that the fundamentalist track is not an alternative for U.S. hegemony but rather part of the very same hegemony, even if it seemed its opposite with regard to its background and literature. Therefore the calculations of the U.S. administration related to Washington’s support of the fundamentalists in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt with the object of guaranteeing that the U.S. example be followed in order to comply with U.S. interests were incorrect and burned the United States in its own fire.

It should be noted that U.S. political experts have closely watched the developments of the Arab Spring and found an advanced means of distorting the reputation of Islam in the near future not only as a religion, but also in consideration of it as one of the basic elements of the social, economic and cultural structure in the region. It is also planning to pave the way for economic conditions in Arab countries that would lead to a sharp decline in their standards of living and a large increase in social unrest.

It is notable that the White House administration is following a dirty policy in its incitement to ignite sectarian disorder and its turning that into a regional conflict in the Middle East that would envelop Iran in that it, for the sake of this, is playing an important role in isolating Iran politically and weakening its allies, Syria and Lebanon. Therefore the United States is releasing its toxins by claiming that Iran is supporting its allies, in the same way the United States is working to form an alliance to support it from among the petro-dollar countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and some of the other Arab countries with the goal of rescuing it from needing to undertake military action to protect Israel from the danger of Iran, according to the U.S. point of view. This sudden development in the United States’ policy in the region implies grave negative consequences in relation to the situation not only in the Middle East and North Africa, but also in the entire world.

Thus we find that this plan falls under the goals of what is called the Arab Spring and democracy in the region, the plan through which the United States is attempting to carry out a specific mission connected to the Iranian nuclear issue and to crush its ally Syria. We find this while noting that Syria will be victorious by holding tight to its resistance of the occupation. The immunity of any Arab regime today is in its devotion to resistance of the occupation and its adherence to national goals and the defense of them — and that it do as Syria did under the leadership of Bashar al-Assad by combating Zionism, fundamentalist terrorism and the U.S. policies that support them, and by felling all U.S., Western and Israeli plans that support the security of Israel and are contrived against the region to plunder its treasures.