Predicting China’s Future

I recently discovered that the U.S. has proposed a plan still under negotiation to deploy troops into China, its next move after its economic colonization of the country. Last year, internet users commented on my article on U.S. military and strategic development, strongly opposed to my opinion on the encirclement of China by the U.S. Yes, there is a U.S. military presence in China, but what is the harm? It seems that these negotiations about President Obama’s troop request have been simmering for quite some time. Although we do not yet know the extent or nature of these negotiations, one can still sense the simmering “political reform” underneath.

Perhaps some are pinning their hopes of “political reform” on the outcome of the U.S.–China troop deployment plan?

Of course, this is merely my personal opinion, which was triggered by a message left by one of my internet followers. Let’s take a look at some of these appeals for political reform. Now that negotiations are underway, if we do not convince our leaders and change their thought process, in the end, the U.S. will deploy troops into China as a result of an elitist consensus and outdated thinking. Before the previous Chinese New Year, while the U.S. still had some semblance of power, it had already set its sights on China. China is a piece of fatty meat; once shared and divided, the country will wake up and destroy American capitalism. Angry Chinese citizens will no doubt wreak havoc upon American interests.

One solution would be to foster a U.S.-controlled government to support American interests in China. The U.S. would comfortably enjoy the fruits and profits of its labor and leave its contradictions to the Chinese.

Now Obama has proposed to deploy troops in China. His preliminary objective is certainly not military but to test the U.S.’s ability to influence China. Secondly, it is also to test China’s strategic wisdom and pit it in a war of wills, in order to determine whether China has the strength to resist the U.S. Thirdly, the U.S. would also like to place troops in the Wakhan Corridor.

Japan guards the East China Sea. The U.S. sails the South China Sea and it wants the Wakhan Corridor. All of China’s natural resources are in the hands of the U.S. As a result, the U.S. can easily control China’s economy and politics or go as far as to provoke conflict between China and Afghanistan and divide and rule society.

If civil unrest happens in China, it will not go the way the U.S. has planned and will most likely head in the exact opposite direction. China is a huge nation with a population of 1.3 billion, 90 percent of whom are Maoists. Once citizens realize the danger facing their country, they will join together as one.

During the Korean War, the Chinese People’s Voluntary Army defeated the U.S. Army using substandard rifles and pushed back American hegemony for decades. Those who claim I am bragging simply do not understand the war spirit and emotion of the Chinese people.

Some, to their credit, do worry that civil unrest in China will lead to strife, conflict and turmoil. However, a China on the brink of losing internal consensus is a major opportunity. Natural disasters brought about primitive communism, brutal exploitation and oppression of the proletarian revolution and socialism. The reforms of the past three decades have forced the nation to choose Maoism. We know that human progress is achieved during a time of disaster and the best solution emerges when people have hit a wall. This is the reason for primitive communism, the philosophy of Marxism-Leninism and Einstein’s theory of relativity.

Disasters bring about people’s dedication and integrity, which leads to the growth of wisdom.

Of course, I do not want to see any strife, conflict or turmoil take place in China; however, the development of world history follows its own internal logic. Even the gods cannot change whose time for change has not come. When the right time comes, contradictions have accumulated to the point when the old values system can be destroyed. At this turning point, great figures emerge. I call this accumulation process of contradictions the annals of coincidence. That is to say, every occasional phenomenon in human history is the necessary result of objective laws. There is a Buddhist philosophy of impermanence. In fact, transience is a normal state; it is the necessary result of objective laws.

I am greatly concerned with the ignorance of the public, which behaves as though asleep. Nevertheless, if woken at the improper time, the opposite result will be produced. When is the right time to wake up? If one walks in the darkness with great despair, one faint glimmer of light can provide the courage and energy to break free. In times of poverty, survival in endless dark nights is indeed possible. In times of relative abundance, however, spiritual crises in the endless night are boundless.

The spiritual crisis of human beings originates from their desire for justice.

This longing for justice is the faint glimmer of hope in the dark night, the reason why Maoism returns to people’s hearts. For the past 30 years, Maoism has been spiritual food for the Chinese people, who welcome and embrace its return wholeheartedly. One day, a rebellious force will burst out.

People pin their hopes on the central government to prevent the disintegration of their nation. Yet the elitists created by capitalism are sparing no efforts to accelerate the transformation of China. I once wrote in an article that two regimes exist in the world. One is the proletariat regime, which I call the world for civilians. The other is the capitalist regime, which I call the world for the bourgeois. The nature of a nation is determined by its ruling class. The disappearance of one class regime alters the nature of a nation.

The death of a country marks the moment of a public awakening. When a nation dies, people lose their homes and identities.

The foundation of capitalist nations is private ownership, while the foundation of socialist nations is public ownership. If the foundation of an economic system disappears, then the nation dies. Apparently, reforms of public ownership are not simple economic issues but manifest themselves in the form of a struggle between the two classes. The root cause of the class struggle is when the ruling class fights you, robs you, denies you the right to resist and say no.

The party cannot win the battle over the restoration of capitalism, but the public can. That is my basic judgment about China’s future. The breaking point for this class struggle will be the stationing of American troops along the Wakhan Corridor.