If the court makes decisions on a partisan basis, it will lose the people’s trust.
Affirmative Action had opened the doors for Blacks ... to join the American ruling classes through the portals of elite universities.
[T]here is no indication that discrimination has been eradicated — quite the contrary.
In 2022, over 60,000 people applied for admission to Harvard; fewer than 2,000 were admitted.
[C]an we commit one wrong to right another?
[T]he U.S. is so divided that it is unlikely there will be a constitutional amendment anytime soon that enables reform of the [Supreme Court].
[I]s limiting the scope of affirmative action a good move or a disaster?
Critics of the [Supreme Court] decision argue that the 6-3 ruling in favor of neutrality denies the U.S.A.'s history of racial injustice.
At its core, affirmative action represented a response to centuries of oppression and discrimination suffered by Blacks in America.
Justice Clarence Thomas benefited from the programs he is now arguing against.
[W]hen somebody vows to eliminate certain rights and is given the power to do so, they generally do.