Posh Progress

October 22, 2008

Published in ABC Journal
(Spain) on 6 October, 2008
by Edurne Uriarte (link to original link to original)

Translated from by Talisa Anderson. Edited by .

Posh Progress

The difference between the United States and Spain is that the majority of American society leans to the right while our society is mainly leftist. For what the Democratic Party and the Popular Party (PP) gain when their adversaries lose. And it is does not matter what the elite intellectual journalist says because over there just as over here the majority is the same, posh progressives.

The control of the posh progressives is due to the nauseating examination of the alleged lack of intelligence and knowledge of Sarah Palin. People that have never mentally left Manhattan have preventively labeled her an idiot for not having left Alaska. Supposed feminist leaders drool over one woman, Hillary Clinton, who has inherited her husbands political power and they look down on someone who has made it on her own, starting from zero and without oval offices and scholars with stained suits in their closets.

Proud intellectuals from Harvard and Yale have become over come with emotion about one of the dumbest expressions in political history, the promise of hope, because the expression is repeated by a certain person and with other pompous expressions who has managed to pull off two books about himself before turning 47. Yet, they disqualify similar slogans as simple when the author is conservative, a woman and from a small town.

One of the idols of the posh progressives, Meryl Streep, has announced that she is going to move to San Sebastian if McCain wins. It would be the first instance an exile moves to the region that ETA dominates, which demonstrates that when the posh progressive sector travels, they remain unaware. They are too busy making fun of conservative women that hunt bears in Alaska while they finish another whiskey in Manhattan.

La diferencia entre Estados Unidos y España es que la sociedad americana es mayoritariamente de derechas mientras la nuestra lo es de izquierdas. Por lo que el Partido Demócrata y el PP ganan cuando pierden los adversarios. Y da más o menos lo mismo lo que diga la élite periodístico-intelectual que tanto allí como aquí es mayoritariamente igual, pijoprogre.
Al dominio de los pijoprogres se debe el nauseabundo examen al que ha sido sometida la supuesta falta de inteligencia y conocimientos de Sarah Palin. Gentes que jamás salieron mentalmente de Manhattan, la tacharon preventivamente de idiota por no haber salido de Alaska. Supuestos adalides del feminismo babearon con una mujer, Hillary Clinton, que heredó el poder político de su marido y desprecian a quien se ha hecho a sí misma, empezando de cero y sin despachos ovales y becarias de vestidos manchados en su armario.
Intelectuales orgullosos de sus Harvards y de sus Yales han moqueado de emoción con una de las expresiones más idiotas de la historia política, la audacia de la esperanza, porque la repite un tipo de voz y ademanes pomposos capaz de perpetrar dos libros sobre sí mismo sin cumplir los 47. Mientras descalifican como simplezas eslóganes semejantes cuando la autora es de derechas, mujer y de pueblo.
Uno de los ídolos de los pijoprogres, Meryl Streep, ha anunciado que se exiliará a San Sebastián si gana McCain. Será el primer caso de exilio a la tierra de ETA, lo que demuestra que, cuando el sectarismo pijoprogre viaja, tampoco se entera. Están demasiado ocupados burlándose de las mujeres de derechas que cazan osos en Alaska mientras apuran otro whisky en Manhattan.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .