Obama Should Be Consistent

April 17, 2009

Published in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
(Germany) on 15 April 2009
by Reinhard Müller (link to original link to original)

Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Patricia Simoni.

It’s obviously not an easy task for President Obama to shake off the legacy he inherited from George W. Bush. His administration has filed suit against a judicial order stating that prisoners held at the Bagram military installation in Afghanistan are entitled to a review of their incarceration by the American court system. The Department of Justice fears that the ruling could compromise military operations. In the case of prisoners of war, the civilian court system wouldn’t have jurisdiction in any event.

But the prisoners held at Bagram weren’t captured in Afghanistan; they were just brought there for interrogation. They are, like the prisoners held at Guantanamo (which Obama intends to close), prisoners of the global and unlimited war on terror. The usual rules of war may be difficult to apply to this conflict, but that shouldn’t be used to justify the systematic violation of basic liberties. Obama needs to be consistent.

In Bagram
Von Reinhard Müller
15 April 2009

So einfach ist es offenbar für den amerikanischen Präsidenten Obama nicht, das Erbe der Bush-Ära abzuschütteln. Seine Regierung hat sich jetzt gegen eine gerichtliche Entscheidung gewandt, nach der Gefangene auf dem amerikanischen Militärstützpunkt Bagram in Afghanistan eine Überprüfung ihrer Haft durch amerikanische Gerichte verlangen können. Das Justizministerium fürchtet, militärische Operationen könnten dadurch gefährdet werden. Handelte es sich um Kriegsgefangene, wären ordentliche Gerichte ohnehin nicht zuständig.

Doch wurden die in Bagram Inhaftierten gar nicht in Afghanistan aufgegriffen, sondern nur zu Verhören dorthin gebracht. Sie sind somit, wie die Insassen in Guantánamo (dieses Lager will Obama schließen), Gefangene im weltweiten und unbegrenzten „Krieg gegen den Terrorismus“. Dieser Konflikt lässt sich zwar mit den überkommenen Kriegsregeln nur schwer bewältigen. Er kann aber die systematische Verletzung grundlegender Freiheitsrechte nicht rechtfertigen. Obama sollte konsequent sein.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Tags:
Germany

Hot this week

Block title

Canada: In His War on Drugs, Trump Battles Both Cartels and Common Sense

November 18, 2025. Published in Toronto Star

Sri Lanka: The American Dream Is Now Transformed: Being an Outsider Is an Asset in American Politics

November 17, 2025. Published in Daily Mirror Online

Saudi Arabia: First US-UN Plan for Palestine Raises Hopes of Peace

November 19, 2025. Published in Arab News

This time, the US led the effort to “internationalize” the conflict and add the UN’s support and legitimacy to its plan.

Australia: Trump’s BBC and Epstein Sagas Dominate Attention as International Relations Are Rewritten

November 14, 2025. Published in ABC News Australia

Mexico: A Migrant’s Triumph

November 18, 2025. Published in La Jornada

The one certainty is that Mamdani has revived hope, thought to be already lost at the hands of the atrocities of the last few months.

Topics

Kenya: PR Power Play: The Zohran Mamdani Masterclass

November 20, 2025. Published in Nation

It's the same quality that once defined Barack Obama's presidential election campaigns: controlled tone, steady message, and moral clarity.

Saudi Arabia: Mohammed bin Salman and Trump…Bridges to the Future

November 20, 2025. Published in Asharq Al-Awsat

And the man behind “Vision 2030” has shown that he is well aware that the US can offer Saudi Arabia what few others can: economically, politically, in defense, in technology, and in artificial intelligence, the new key to progress.