Iran: Obama Is RightNot To Do More

Published in Le Figaro
(France) on 24 June 2009
by Pierre Rousselin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Drue Fergison. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
Barack Obama responded to those who reproached him with not having done enough for the Iranian opposition by affirming that the United States was “horrified and outraged” by the repression. But he maintained his course of action, which consists of:

• Avoiding the invitation of accusations of foreign interference, which would allow the regime to clear its name. What matters, he said, is “the legitimacy” of the Iranian leadership “in the eyes of its own people.”

• Causing the Iranian regime to face its responsibilities, with the invitation for the adoption of a line of conduct that conforms to international rules. “It is not too late,” he said. He couldn't be more encouraging of the reformists.

Obama doesn’t need to throw oil on water. For several reasons:

• The Iranian revolution, the supreme leader and President Ahmadinejad first lost their legitimacy by fixing the presidential elections and then by firing on the people. In the short run, power is maintained by force. But in the long run, the foundations are indisputably weakened.

• Repression discouraged the protesters, but the opposition is not vanquished. The protest will remain and will change form. The divisions in the heart of the hierarchy are not going to disappear. Obama is right to remain cautious and to say that no one knows how it’s all going to end. Decreeing sanctions today could result in helping the ultra conservatives by allowing them to mobilize against the “Great Satan.”

• The opening created by Obama’s election – his outstretched hand – is not foreign to the thirst for change being expressed in Iran. It weakens the radicals and encourages the moderates. The American president stays the course. He praises the “extraordinary debate” opened in Iran and acts as though the Iranian leaders are able to channel this debate. He knows that it’s impossible and waits to see what will happen. The Iranians understand: They remember that it took more than one year of protests before they achieved the downfall of the Shah 30 years ago.


Iran : Obama a raison de ne pas en faire plus

Barack Obama a répondu à ceux qui lui reprochent de ne pas avoir assez pris fait et cause pour l'opposition iranienne en affirmant que les Etats-unis étaient "horrifiés et indignés" par la répression. Mais il a maintenu sa ligne de conduite qui consiste à:

éviter de prêter le flanc aux accusations d'ingérence étrangère qui permettent au régime de se dédouanner. Ce qui importe, a-t-il dit, est "la légitimité" des dirigeants iraniens "aux yeux de leur propre peuple".

mettre le régime iranien devant ses responsabilités en l'invitant à adopter une ligne de conduite conforme aux règles internationales. "Il n'est pas trop tard...", a-t-il dit. Il ne pouvait pas mieux encourager les réformistes.
Obama n'a pas besoin de jeter de l'huile sur le feu. Pour plusieurs raisons:

La révolution iranienne, le Guide suprême et le président Ahmadinejad ont perdu leur légitimité d'abord en truquant la présidentielle et ensuite en tirant sur la foule. A court terme, le pouvoir s'est maintenu par la force. Mais à long terme, ses bases sont indiscutablement ébranlées.
La répression a découragé les manifestants mais l'opposition n'est pas vaincue. La contestation demeure et va changer de forme. Les divisions au sein de la hiérarchie ne vont pas disparaître. Obama a raison de rester prudent et de dire que l'on ignore encore comment tout cela va se terminer. Décréter des sanctions aujourd'hui reviendrait à aider les ultras en leur permettant de mobiliser contre le "Grand Satan"
L'ouverture créée par l'élection d'Obama -sa main tendue- n'est pas étrangère à la soif de changement qui s'exprime en Iran. Elle affaiblit les radicaux et encourage les modérés. Le président américain reste sur la même ligne, il se félicite du "débat extraordinaire" ouvert en Iran et fait comme si les dirigeants iraniens étaient capables de canaliser ce débat. Il sait que c'est impossible et attend de voir ce qui va suivre. Les Iraniens l'ont bien compris: ils se rappellent qu'il a fallu plus d'un an de manifestations avant d'aboutir à la chute du Shah, il y a trente ans.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

France: Europe: Toward a Painful But Necessary Break with the US

Israel: Donald Trump’s Intervention in the Netanyahu Trial Is Unacceptable

South Africa: How US Foreign Policy under Trump Erodes Legitimacy in the Global South

India: How Great Empires Rise and Fall: A Cue to America’s Fate

Mexico: The Halftime Show That Enraged President Trump

Topics

Mexico: The United States: Arms Supplier to Drug Traffickers

India: What’s behind the Layoffs at The Washington Post?

   

Israel: Donald Trump’s Intervention in the Netanyahu Trial Is Unacceptable

Saudi Arabia: Recalling the Night the US Ambassador to Libya Was Killed

Saudi Arabia: Great Unraveling: 2026 Super Bowl Sounds Death Knell for US Unity

France: Europe: Toward a Painful But Necessary Break with the US

Mexico: The Halftime Show That Enraged President Trump

Japan: Diplomacy between Major Nations and Japan: Create a Unified Core of Mid-Level Nations

Related Articles

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation

France: Donald Trump’s Laborious Diplomatic Debut

France: Trump’s Greenland Obsession