The Scapegoat

Published in Der Tagesspiegel
(Germany) on 30 June 2009
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Robin Silberman.
The world needs a culprit, so Bernard Madoff has become the face of the financial crisis.

Finally! Someone is being punished. 150 years in prison. That soothes our hearts! That proves it’s not just the little guy who always suffers!

What a mistake. Bernard Madoff is being unjustly pilloried for the financial crisis. He ran a Ponzi scheme that, unlike other schemes, wasn’t designed to bring instant gratification to the greedy. Instead - and here’s the genius of it - it was supposed to provide stable, crisis-resistant rates of return that were slightly higher than more conservative investments.

What he did was undoubtedly illegal and led to the financial ruin of many of his investors, so his sentence was justified. But his deeds were the exact opposite of what the banks did. His system was so conservative, it took a total collapse of the credit sector to bring it down.

The sentence comes at a time when it’s obvious banks are once again beginning to speculate with the same toxic paper that caused the crisis in the first place. They’re doing it with money hot off the government presses. While the public comforts itself with Madoff’s sentence, those responsible for the crisis still walk free to take up where they left off.



Der Sündenbock
30.6.2009

Die Welt braucht einen Schuldigen, und die Finanzkrise scheint in Bernard Madoff ein Gesicht bekommen zu haben.

Endlich wird einer bestraft. 150 Jahre Haft, das besänftigt die Herzen, das zeigt, dass nicht nur die Kleinen gehängt werden. Was für ein Irrtum. Bernard Madoff steht zu Unrecht für die Finanzkrise am Pranger. Er hat ein Schneeballsystem aufgebaut, das entgegen anderen dieser Art nicht die große schnelle Gier befriedigt, sondern – das ist das geniale – stabile, krisenresistente Renditen schuf, die nur etwas bessere Zinsen brachten als konservative Anleihen. Sein Tun war ohne Zweifel kriminell, er hat viele Menschen ruiniert. Das Urteil ist deshalb richtig. Aber sein Konzept war das Gegenteil von dem, was die Banken taten. Sein System war so konservativ, dass es eines totalen Zusammenbruchs des Kreditsektors bedurfte, um es zu kippen. Das Urteil kommt zu einem Zeitpunkt, da bekannt wird, dass Banken schon wieder anfangen zu zocken. Mit Giftpapieren, wie sie die Finanzkrise mit verursacht haben. Mit Geld, das Regierungen drucken. Während die Öffentlichkeit mit diesem Urteil beruhigt wird, laufen die Verantwortlichen der Krise frei herum und fangen wieder an. os
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Egypt: Iran and Washington: A Deal Completed or a More Painful Strike?

Mexico: The United States: Arms Supplier to Drug Traffickers

Saudi Arabia: Recalling the Night the US Ambassador to Libya Was Killed

France: Europe: Toward a Painful But Necessary Break with the US

Saudi Arabia: Great Unraveling: 2026 Super Bowl Sounds Death Knell for US Unity

Topics

India: How Trump’s Escalation Math Doesn’t Yet Add Up to War with Iran

Egypt: Iran and Washington: A Deal Completed or a More Painful Strike?

Germany: Rubio’s Charm Offensive Changes Nothing*

Iraq: From Noriega to Maduro: The Logic of Force in US Policy

Mexico: The United States: Arms Supplier to Drug Traffickers

India: What’s behind the Layoffs at The Washington Post?

   

Israel: Donald Trump’s Intervention in the Netanyahu Trial Is Unacceptable

Saudi Arabia: Recalling the Night the US Ambassador to Libya Was Killed

Related Articles

Germany: Trump’s Greenland Threats: The EU Must Defend Itself!

Germany: The Epstein Curse Continues To Loom Large

Germany: Donald Trump vs. James Comey: A Legal Vendetta

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait

Germany: A Software for Authoritarian Restructuring