The Scapegoat

Published in Der Tagesspiegel
(Germany) on 30 June 2009
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Robin Silberman.
The world needs a culprit, so Bernard Madoff has become the face of the financial crisis.

Finally! Someone is being punished. 150 years in prison. That soothes our hearts! That proves it’s not just the little guy who always suffers!

What a mistake. Bernard Madoff is being unjustly pilloried for the financial crisis. He ran a Ponzi scheme that, unlike other schemes, wasn’t designed to bring instant gratification to the greedy. Instead - and here’s the genius of it - it was supposed to provide stable, crisis-resistant rates of return that were slightly higher than more conservative investments.

What he did was undoubtedly illegal and led to the financial ruin of many of his investors, so his sentence was justified. But his deeds were the exact opposite of what the banks did. His system was so conservative, it took a total collapse of the credit sector to bring it down.

The sentence comes at a time when it’s obvious banks are once again beginning to speculate with the same toxic paper that caused the crisis in the first place. They’re doing it with money hot off the government presses. While the public comforts itself with Madoff’s sentence, those responsible for the crisis still walk free to take up where they left off.



Der Sündenbock
30.6.2009

Die Welt braucht einen Schuldigen, und die Finanzkrise scheint in Bernard Madoff ein Gesicht bekommen zu haben.

Endlich wird einer bestraft. 150 Jahre Haft, das besänftigt die Herzen, das zeigt, dass nicht nur die Kleinen gehängt werden. Was für ein Irrtum. Bernard Madoff steht zu Unrecht für die Finanzkrise am Pranger. Er hat ein Schneeballsystem aufgebaut, das entgegen anderen dieser Art nicht die große schnelle Gier befriedigt, sondern – das ist das geniale – stabile, krisenresistente Renditen schuf, die nur etwas bessere Zinsen brachten als konservative Anleihen. Sein Tun war ohne Zweifel kriminell, er hat viele Menschen ruiniert. Das Urteil ist deshalb richtig. Aber sein Konzept war das Gegenteil von dem, was die Banken taten. Sein System war so konservativ, dass es eines totalen Zusammenbruchs des Kreditsektors bedurfte, um es zu kippen. Das Urteil kommt zu einem Zeitpunkt, da bekannt wird, dass Banken schon wieder anfangen zu zocken. Mit Giftpapieren, wie sie die Finanzkrise mit verursacht haben. Mit Geld, das Regierungen drucken. Während die Öffentlichkeit mit diesem Urteil beruhigt wird, laufen die Verantwortlichen der Krise frei herum und fangen wieder an. os
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Iran: 2 Scenes from Masoud Pezeshkian’s Trip to New York

South Korea: Trump’s Mind: What No One Knows

Topics

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Thailand: Southeast Asia Amid the US-China Rift

Japan: Trump Administration: Absurd Censorship

Taiwan: Can Benefits from TikTok and Taiwan Be Evaluated the Same Way?

Russia: Bagram Absurdity*

   

Related Articles

Germany: Donald Trump vs. James Comey: A Legal Vendetta

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait

Germany: A Software for Authoritarian Restructuring

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?