Except for two business days when money was lost in the second quarter, the U.S. bank Goldman Sachs earned $50 million or more per day between April and June. During this same period, there were 46 days that had gains of over $100 million a day.
In total, the bank was $3.4 billion in the black for the quarter.
At the end of 2008, Goldman was saved with $10 billion in cash contributions from taxpaying Americans. The amount was sent by the Treasury Department, at that time managed by Henry Paulson, ex-president of Goldman Sachs.
Paulson also loaned money to other banks. In total, deposits of $350 billion. Several, like Goldman, have paid the loan, and life goes on.
The purpose of the emergency contributions: keep the banks afloat until they return to profitability and can finance mortgage lenders.
The first part worked.
Most banks returned to profitability in the second quarter. The rebound is evident in their share values on the New York Stock Exchange.
The second purpose, the financing of mortgage lenders, has not been so successful.
In June, the volume of credit offered by banks to households in the U.S. dropped for the ninth time in 11 months. About $10.3 billion less was borrowed. The drop is five percent over the last 12 months. This is bad, because 70 percent of the GDP depends on U.S. consumption.
As for the borrowers, in addition to direct injections in banks, in March the government put $35 billion in the system to finance equity for families in debt.
Today, 2.7 million mortgages have gone unpaid for at least two months. Less than 10 percent of these loans – 235 million – have reached agreements with the banks. The rest are running the risk of losing their homes; there have been 1.5 million evictions in the first half of the year.
At the height of the crisis, the Obama administration launched an ambitious plan to tighten regulation of the financial system and give more protection to consumers, including cuts of executive bonuses and restrictions on those who make large amounts of money from taking high risks.
Strengthened and profitable, the banking industry now wants to maintain the status quo.
It is funding hundreds of key political posts in Congress.
A recent study shows that the approval of Obama fell from 57 percent in early July to 50 percent in August.
The effect is not as strong with African Americans.
Only two percent of whites are "very satisfied" with the government, compared to 13 percent of blacks. Among whites, 47 percent say the economy is bad, but only 25 percent of African Americans think so.
Unemployment is almost double for African Americans: 14.5 percent compared with 8.6 percent for whites, with an average of 9.4 percent of all Americans.
US$ 50 milhões ao dia
NOVA YORK - Com a exceção de apenas dois dias úteis em que perdeu dinheiro no segundo trimestre, o banco norte-americano Goldman Sachs lucrou US$ 50 milhões ou mais ao dia entre abril e junho. Em 46 dias no mesmo perÃodo, foram mais de US$ 100 milhões/dia.
No total, o banco teve resultado positivo de US$ 3,4 bilhões no trimestre.
Hoje, 2,7 milhões de mutuários estão pelo menos dois meses sem pagar prestações. Menos de 10% deles (235 mil) conseguiram acordos com os bancos. Correm o risco de perder suas casas, engrossando 1,5 milhão de ações de despejo do primeiro semestre.
No auge da crise, o governo de Barack Obama lançou um ambicioso plano para apertar a regulamentação do sistema financeiro e dar mais proteção aos consumidores. As medidas miram desde os elevados bônus a restrições a quem faz muito dinheiro assumindo elevados riscos.
Fortalecida e lucrativa, a indústria bancária quer agora manter o "status quo".
É ela quem financia centenas de parlamentares em postos chaves no Congresso.
*
Pesquisa de opinião recente mostra que a aprovação de Obama caiu de 57% no inÃcio de julho para 50% em agosto.
Nem tanto entre negros, como Obama, mais afetados pela crise.
Só 2% dos brancos estão "muito satisfeitos" com o governo, ante 13% dos negros. Entre os brancos, 47% dizem que a economia vai mal. São apenas 25% entre os negros.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.