Obama the Enigma

Published in ABC
(Spain) on 28 December 2009
by José María Carrascal (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Annerys Diaz. Edited by Amy Wong.
Obama’s Christmas gift to the American people was his reform of the health care system, something that had not been achieved by any of his predecessors. He could have done better, but his star was beginning to wane. Let no one be of the opinion, however, that this reform will establish a public health system in America similar to that in Europe. Clinics, doctors and medicine will remain private. The only change is for those who cannot afford a health insurance policy; they will receive government assistance based on income and the number of relatives. This is an extension of the current state aid system, which has left both sides dissatisfied. The left criticizes the bill’s failure to set up a real public health system. The right claims that it will cost a fortune and the government has no funds to pay for it. For the 30 million Americans without medical coverage, however, it is a blessing. Obama prefers a small reform as opposed to nothing. What this shows, along with his attitude towards the war in Iraq, is a clearer picture of his ideals.

To conservatives, Obama is a dangerous socialist who intends to destroy the “American way of life.” To liberals, he is the one who will transform American society. Neither view has been proven completely true. Obama did not come to change the American system; he came to fix it as much as possible. He is not an ideologue but a pragmatist who works with what he has. He does not set unreachable goals but those that are reachable. He makes pacts and concessions but does not forget his objectives. He does not follow dogmas but principles.

This has been the case throughout his life. Only during his election campaign did the idea of changing the United States and then the world develop. Perhaps this came about because he is black, but Obama is not exactly black. He is a mulatto who has spent his life among whites, feeling his blackness. In any case, he is a mixture of races and cultures, a crossroads of formulas, the only way out of which is consensus. He is not an anti-system revolutionary but a system corrector who seeks to improve the United States while respecting its identity. In that sense, President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero of Spain is the exact opposite, bent on remaking everything in Spain, beginning with its history.

Zapatero and his experiment face the risk that they will ruin the country. Obama faces the risk of disappointing not the extremists but those who saw him as the man who came to solve America’s problems, from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to the bankrupted economy. Obama knows, though, that these are problems with no short-term solutions. They can only be mitigated. It is what it is. For any other president, this would suffice, but more is expected from him. This is the price of having inspired so many dreams and illusions.


Obama, ese enigma
JOSÉ MARÍA CARRASCAL Lunes , 28-12-09
EL regalo navideño de Obama fue la reforma del sistema sanitario norteamericano, algo que no había logrado ninguno de sus predecesores. Falta le hacía. Su estrella empezaba a declinar.
Nadie crea, sin embargo, que se trata de establecer en Estados Unidos una salud pública semejante a la europea. Clínicas, médicos y medicinas seguirán siendo privadas. Lo único nuevo es que quienes no puedan pagarse una póliza de seguro médico, recibirán del gobierno ayuda para agenciársela, según sus ingresos y el número de familiares. O sea, una ampliación del actual sistema con ayuda estatal, lo que ha dejado descontentos a ambos extremos. La izquierda critica, que no se haya establecido una auténtica sanidad pública. La derecha, que va a costar un dineral, sin fondos con que pagarlo. Pero para los 30 millones de norteamericanos que no tienen cobertura médica será una bendición. Y Obama ha preferido una pequeña reforma a ninguna. Lo que nos da, como nos había dado su actitud ante la guerra, una idea mucho más exacta de él que la que venía circulando.
Para los conservadores, Obama era un peligroso socialista que intentaba acabar con el «american way of life». Para la progresía, era el hombre que venía a transformar la sociedad norteamericana. No ha resultado ni una cosa ni otra. Obama no ha venido a cambiar el sistema norteamericano. Ha venido a corregirlo en lo posible. No es un ideólogo, es un pragmático que opera con los que hay. No se pone metas demasiado altas, sino sólo las alcanzables. Pacta, hace concesiones, pero no olvida su objetivo. No tiene dogmas, pero sí principios.
Y ha sido así durante toda su vida. Sólo durante la campaña electoral surgió la idea de que venía a cambiar los Estados Unidos, y con ellos, el mundo. Tal vez por ser negro. Pero Obama no es exactamente negro. Es mulato. Un mulato que se ha pasado su vida entre blancos, sintiendo su negritud. En cualquier caso, una mezcla de razas y culturas. Como su política, una encrucijada de fórmulas, cuya única salida es el consenso. No es un revolucionario antisistema, sino un corrector del sistema, que busca mejorar los Estados Unidos respetando lo que son, sin romperlos. En ese sentido, es lo opuesto a Zapatero, empeñado en rehacer todo en España, empezando por su historia.
Si el riesgo de Zapatero es que, en el experimento, se le vaya al traste el país, el de Obama es que desilusione, no ya a los extremistas de ambos bandos, sino a quienes le veían como el hombre que venía a solucionar los problemas del país, desde las guerras en que está envuelto a su economía en bancarrota. Pero Obama sabe que hay problemas que no tienen solución, al menos a corto plazo. Sólo pueden mitigarse. Es en lo que está. A cualquier otro presidente, le bastaría. Pero a él se le pide más. Es el precio de haber despertado tantas ilusiones.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Mexico: Qatar, Trump and Venezuela

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Topics

Mexico: Qatar, Trump and Venezuela

Mexico: Nostalgia for the Invasions

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?