Geopolitical Coherence

Published in El País
(Spain) on 6 February 2010
by Francisco Sánchez Pérez (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Veronica Pascarel. Edited by Jessica Boesl.
Obama’s absence from the European Union summit in Madrid is a clear indication of the U.S.’s geostrategic change at a peak time of the rising powers of the Orient. It is something logical and inevitable but, as a consequence, it also shows that Europe is losing ground in the international arena.

Assuming this (and it is better for us to do so in a realistic way in order to better adapt to the new panorama), it is expected that this loss of ground for our Union will be apparent in all aspects. For example, this will affect the contributions that the various members of the E.U. (Spain among them) have made in correspondence with their old power positions and close alliance with the United States. To start, we should withdraw our soldiers from territories of American geostrategic interest (e.g. Afghanistan). In doing so we would spare the lives of European citizens and extravagant expenses, which we could then allocate for necessary policies in favor of the best possible shape of our Union in the new international arena. In order to make this feasible, we must try not to fall for the tricks that will certainly be offered by the American administration.

In what other way could it be understood that Obama will miss the political meeting in Madrid but not the military one on the occasion of the next NATO summit in Lisbon?


Que el plantón de Obama a la cumbre de la Unión Europea en Madrid es un claro indicio de cambio geoestratégico de Estados Unidos, al albur del surgimiento de las nuevas potencias de Oriente, es algo lógico e inevitable, como también lo es, en consecuencia, que Europa pierda peso político en el concierto internacional.

La noticia en otros webs

* webs en español
* en otros idiomas

Asumido esto (y más nos vale hacerlo de forma realista para mejor acoplarnos al nuevo panorama), lo esperable es que esa pérdida de peso de nuestra Unión sea coherente en todos los sentidos. Por ejemplo: en el capítulo de las aportaciones que los distintos países de la UE, entre ellos España, vienen haciendo en correspondencia con su posición de vieja potencia y estrecha aliada de Estados Unidos. Para empezar, deberíamos retirar a nuestros soldados destacados en zonas de interés geoestratégico norteamericano (véase Afganistán). Así nos ahorramos vidas de ciudadanos europeos, amén de enormes dispendios que podremos dedicar a las políticas necesarias en pro del mejor encaje posible de nuestra Unión en el nuevo escenario mundial. Para que esto sea factible, hemos de procurar no caer en las añagazas que, a buen seguro, nos seguirá ofreciendo la Administración norteamericana.

¿Cómo se entiende, si no, que Obama falte al encuentro político de Madrid y no al militar, como así se ha dicho, con ocasión de la próxima cumbre de la OTAN en Lisboa.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Topics

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?