The United States has been too occupied with wars far from home in the last 10 years to notice that there is one growing at the doors of its own house. The assassination of two American citizens and one Mexican on the streets of Ciudad Juárez a week ago has been the trigger that has woken the neighbor to the north out of its dream.
The triple murder has generated serious diplomatic tensions between the two countries. Mexico has perceived the American promise to find the culprits as a threat of interference, and the first statements made by Janet Napolitano, the secretary of Homeland Security, did not help much. She criticized the absence of results from Felipe Calderón’s security strategy, which, among other things, included the deployment of 8,000 soldiers to Chihuahua, which has now become one of the most violent states in the world. Mexico has also accused the United States of being the main client of the drugs that have stained Chihuahua with blood (an average of 6.6 violent deaths occur per day) and of arming the combatants through its laxity in the cross-border arms trade.
After these initial moments of tension, good sense seems to have returned to the two neighboring countries. The White House has hurried to publicize the invitation of Mexico's president to Washington this May, and has announced Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visit to Mexico this March, when she will be accompanied by a high-level group, including Napolitano herself. The agenda for both meetings will include the joint fight against narcotrafficking, which the FBI and DEA have already started to pursue aggressively in El Paso, the peaceful Texan city close to Ciudad Juárez. There, the hit men seem to find the rest — and the ammunition necessary to impose the brutality of their laws on the other side of the border.
Estados Unidos ha estado demasiado ocupado en guerras lejanas en los últimos 10 años como para percatarse de que se larvaba una en las mismas puertas de su casa. El asesinato hace una semana de dos ciudadanos estadounidenses y un mexicano, camino de Ciudad Juárez, ha sido el detonante que ha hecho despertar del sueño al vecino del norte.
El triple asesinato ha generado serias tensiones diplomáticas entre ambos países. Desde México se percibió como una amenaza de injerencia la promesa estadounidense de hallar a los culpables; y no ayudaron demasiado las primeras declaraciones de Janet Napolitano, la secretaria de Seguridad Interna, criticando la ausencia de resultados de la estrategia de seguridad de Felipe Calderón, que, entre otras cosas, ha desplegado 8.000 soldados en Chihuahua, convertido en uno de los Estados más violentos del mundo en este momento. También México ha acusado a Estados Unidos de ser el principal cliente de la droga que tiñe de sangre el Estado de Chihuahua, con una media de 6,6 muertes violentas al día, y de armar a los violentos gracias a su permisividad en el comercio transfronterizo de armas.
Tras esos primeros momentos de tensión, la sensatez parece haberse instalado entre los dos países vecinos. La Casa Blanca se ha apresurado a hacer pública la invitación cursada al presidente de México para acudir a Washington en mayo próximo; y anuncia la visita a México de la secretaria de Estado Hillary Clinton el próximo martes, acompañada de un grupo de alto nivel, en el que está la propia Napolitano. En la agenda de ambos encuentros estará la lucha conjunta contra el narcotráfico, al que el FBI y la DEA ya han empezado a acosar en El Paso, la tranquila ciudad tejana próxima a Ciudad Juárez. Allí los sicarios parecen encontrar el reposo y la munición que necesitan para imponer la brutalidad de sus leyes al otro lado de la frontera.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.