“Israel will be the victim of geography and demography,”* prophesied De Gaulle, indicating that Israel would not be able to resist the pressure of the surrounding Arab world, which has a much superior birth rate to its own. However, Israel has not only resisted both pressures but has accumulated victory after victory until it has converted itself into the premier power of the Middle East. No country in its surroundings, or all of them put together, can stand up to it.
That could carry Israel, paradoxically, to destruction. In order to continue using its power in all its forms and in occasions where it appears challenged, that same strength will turn against it. It is already happening. It is true that it would only take Israel’s enemies one battle to annihilate it, whereas Israel would have to eliminate all of them in order not to disappear. But in the global world in which we live, he who minds only his particular interests without keeping in mind those of the community will inevitably end up condemned to ostracism. Remember South Africa under apartheid. It is what Israel’s most sensitive spirits are warning against.
In a global world, there are no individual solutions, and the Palestinian problem has been poisoning international relations since the division of that territory. It is this that is impeding the rapprochement of the West and the spread of moderate Islam, this that makes it impossible for the Palestinian Authority to control its people and this that has converted Gaza into a small fort controlled by Hamas, a terrorist organization. “The flotilla was aiming to break the Gaza blockade,” claimed the Israeli government in order to justify its commandos’ assault of it. But the problem comes precisely from having Gaza blockaded. In the 21st century, a million and a half people cannot be locked inside a ghetto. Today, Gaza is a powder keg ready to explode, to the satisfaction of extremists.
Israel believed that, with the backing of the United States, it could resist the harassment coming not only from the Arab world but also from the entire world. Until now it has achieved that, thanks to the carte blanche offered by all American presidents to defend itself. But the United States has other priorities than the defense of Israel, and Obama has already shown interest in a more well-balanced Middle East foreign policy. Even if Israel continues to get a green light from Washington, what will happen when the United States is no longer the only superpower, when China or India begins to rule world affairs? They do not have the least interest in preserving the state of Israel, nor do they possess the guilty conscience of the Christians towards the Jews.
I would say that the first party interested in finding a just and balanced solution to the Palestinian problem is Israel. Then, we are. The Jews can never return to being a wandering people without rights or a homeland in the world. Neither can the Palestinians.
*Editor's Note: This quotation, accurately translated, could not be verified.
Todos somos Oriente Próximo
José María Carrascal
«ISRAEL será victima de la geografía y la demografía», profetizó De Gaulle, indicando que no podría resistir la presión del mundo árabe circundante, con una natalidad muy superior a la suya. Pero Israel no sólo ha resistido ambas presiones, sino que ha acumulado victoria tras victoria hasta convertirse en la primera potencia del Oriente Próximo, sin que ningún país de su entorno, o todos juntos, puedan hacerle frente.
Lo que puede llevarle, paradójicamente, a la derrota. De seguir usando su potencia en toda su amplitud y en cuantas ocasiones se ve desafiada, esa misma fuerza se volverá contra él. Ya está ocurriendo. Es verdad que a sus enemigos les basta ganar sólo una batalla para aniquilarle, mientras Israel tiene que ganarlas todas para no desaparecer. Pero en el mundo global en que vivimos, quien mira sólo sus intereses particulares sin tener en cuenta los del conjunto termina inevitablemente condenado al ostracismo. Recuerden la Sudáfrica del apartheid. Es lo que vienen advirtiendo dentro de Israel sus espíritus más sensibles.
En un mundo global no hay soluciones individuales y el problema palestino viene envenenando las relaciones internacionales desde la división de aquel territorio. Es lo que impide la aproximación de Occidente y el islamismo moderado, lo que hace imposible que la Autoridad Palestina controle a su pueblo y lo que ha convertido Gaza en un fortín de Hamás, una organización terrorista. «La flotilla buscaba romper el bloqueo de Gaza», alega el gobierno israelí para justificar el asalto de sus comandos a la misma. Pero es que el problema viene precisamente de tener Gaza bloqueada. En el siglo XXI, no se puede tener a millón y medio de personas encerradas en un gueto. Gaza es hoy un barril de pólvora listo a estallar, para contento de los extremistas.
Israel ha creído que, con el respaldo de los Estados Unidos, podría resistir el acoso no ya del mundo árabe, sino de todo el mundo. Hasta ahora lo que conseguido, gracias a la carta blanca que le dieron todos los presidentes norteamericanos para defenderse. Pero Estados Unidos tiene otras prioridades que la defensa de Israel y Obama ya ha mostrado interés por una política más equilibrada en el Oriente Próximo. E incluso si Israel sigue teniendo luz verde de Washington, ¿qué ocurrirá cuando Estados Unidos deje de ser la única superpotencia, cuando China o India empiecen a regir los asuntos mundiales? Ellas no tienen mayor interés en preservar el Estado de Israel, ni la mala conciencia de los cristianos hacia los judíos.
Quiero decir que el primer interesado en hallar una solución justa, equilibrada al problema palestino es Israel. Luego, nosotros. Ni los judíos pueden volver a ser el pueblo errante, sin patria ni derechos por el mundo. Ni pueden serlo los palestinos.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.