War in Afghanistan Increasingly Toxic for Obama Administration

Published in El Pais
(Spain) on 23 June 2010
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Scott Clark. Edited by Benjamin Beeghly.
Dissatisfaction with the progress of the war in Afghanistan has come to impact the commander of U.S. forces in the region.

The urgent call to the White House of Gen. Stanley McChrystal is the first high-level indication of the damage that the war is doing to the Obama administration. McChrystal, commander of U.S. forces and NATO in Afghanistan, was called to the White House to explain some openly critical — even insulting — statements he made to the press about Obama and some of his staff.

McChrystal, a respected soldier tapped to lead the war a year ago, has apologized. But his comments, and those of his aides, indirectly targeted Obama, exposing disagreements from the military over the political direction of the conflict, disappointment in the way things are going and, if that weren’t enough, evident lack of conviction about the outcome. The comments appear in print at a time when deaths of coalition soldiers are multiplying, and it has become clear that certain elements of the allied strategy are not working. United States citizens found out, through a report by Congress, that $2 billion of their money is going to local mafia bosses — thus, indirectly, to the Taliban — as protection money for the NATO convoys that distribute supplies to 200 U.S. bases in the country.

The unease brought on by Afghanistan is not limited to the White House, and its implications are not exclusively military. Washington’s European allies are becoming more and more skeptical. The war provoked the recent resignation of the German president and the fall of the Dutch government. The Canadians and the Dutch are now making plans to pull out of the region.

The reality is that neither Washington nor its allies, including President Karzai, have any credible plans to decide the outcome of the war once and for all — in spite of such a formidable deployment — and this with only a year to go before the United States is set to withdraw. Progress in the economic and political reconstruction of Afghanistan is moving at a desperately slow pace. Pakistan is playing a double game. The majority of Afghans — under a corrupt government that fails to provide security, job or service — can’t allow themselves to confront the Taliban, and the U.S. soldiers are just as fearsome as the Islamic fanatics. This perception is strengthened by the civilian slaughter that has come to mark this war, and not helped by the American inability to launch the much-publicized offensive against Kandahar, the supposed testing ground for the new NATO strategy.


El malestar por el curso de la guerra alcanza al alto mando estadounidense sobre el terreno


La convocatoria urgente a la Casa Blanca del comandante en jefe estadounidense y de la OTAN en Afganistán, general Stanley McChrystal, para que explique unas declaraciones periodísticas suyas y de sus colaboradores inmediatos abiertamente críticas, cuando no insultantes, hacia miembros relevantes del equipo presidencial, son la primera señal al más alto nivel de los estragos de Afganistán en la Administración de Barack Obama.

McChrystal, un respetado soldado designado hace un año para conducir la guerra, ha pedido perdón. Pero sus comentarios y los de su entorno, que alcanzan oblicuamente al propio Obama, reflejan discrepancias militares sobre la dirección política del conflicto, desilusión por la marcha de los acontecimientos y, a la postre, escasa convicción sobre su desenlace. El artículo aparece cuando se multiplican los muertos de la coalición internacional y es patente que no funcionan elementos centrales de la estrategia aliada. Los estadounidenses se han enterado por un informe del Congreso de que su dinero (2.000 millones de dólares) sirve para pagar la protección de jefes mafiosos locales -e indirectamente de los talibanes- a los convoyes de la OTAN que distribuyen suministros a 200 bases de EE UU en el país.

La desazón que provoca Afganistán no se confina a la Casa Blanca, y sus implicaciones no son exclusivamente militares. Los socios europeos de Washington se muestran cada vez más escépticos. La guerra ha provocado la reciente dimisión del presidente alemán y la caída del Gobierno de Holanda. Canadienses y holandeses ya tienen planes para irse.

La realidad es que ni Washington y sus aliados, pese a su formidable despliegue, ni el presidente Karzai tienen planes creíbles para decantar la guerra de su lado, a solo un año de que comience la retirada estadounidense. Los progresos en la reconstrucción de Afganistán, económicos y políticos, son desesperadamente lentos. Pakistán practica un doble juego. La mayoría de los afganos -con un Gobierno corrupto que no ofrece seguridad ni trabajo ni tampoco servicios- no se pueden permitir ponerse frente a los talibanes y los soldados de Estados Unidos son tan temidos como los fanáticos islamistas. Una percepción acentuada por la sangría de civiles que jalona la guerra, en la que ni siquiera se produce la publicitada ofensiva sobre Kandahar, supuesta prueba de fuego de la nueva estrategia de la OTAN.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?