Bush, Remembrance and Shame

Published in El Pais
(Spain) on 14 November 2010
by Abel Veiga Copo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Arie Braizblot. Edited by Sam Carter.
The former American president just published a memoir that looks to cleanse his image and possibly redeem him. We don’t know if he wrote them or if he had them written for him. But they do suffer from poor logic, reason and dignity.

The fact that Bush would say that he disagreed with his government about the war in Iraq and that he continues to endorse terrorism paints a portrait of him. He was one of the presidents most manipulated by political hawks and economic sharks. He reduced the prestige of the United States, eliminated the initial multilateralism and broke all international law through pressure, blackmail and deception. Saddam was, without a doubt, a ruler and a tyrant, but not worse than many others who have been and continue to be protected by Washington and other foreign ministries.

Under Bush’s presidency, the United States lived through one of its darkest periods, one of its own inexorable decline.

In 2003, the thought process of neoconservatives was set up in Washington with a clear agenda: to revitalize the old American empire and lay the groundwork to dominate the 21st century. Along those lines, the launch of the Iraq war, in March of 2003, was named Operation Shock and Awe. The victory was easy; the worst would come later, when it was revealed that the U.S. was not prepared for the aftermath of the war.

Not even the United Nations, silenced by the Bush administration, disputed the legality of the war in Iraq. The diplomacy of interests and the interests of diplomacy functioned perfectly. The U.S. pressured the Security Council to win votes and avoid the veto. On Feb. 5, 2003, one of the most shameful displays in the history of the United Nations took place, with Powell and De Palacio demonstrating supposed evidence and delivering aggressive speeches. As years passed, they blamed their intelligence services for the lies about weapons of mass destruction. Little do they care about the thousands of dead in Iraq, the torture, the secret prisons, the humiliations or Abu Ghraib. It was an illegal and immoral war. That is what is forgotten.


Bush, memoria y vergüenza
ABEL VEIGA COPO - Profesor de Derecho en ICADE - 14/11/2010
El ex presidente norteamericano acaba de publicar unas memorias que buscan el maquillaje, tal vez la redención. No sabemos si las ha escrito o se las han escrito. Pero sí que adolecen de coherencia, razón y dignidad.
Que Bush diga que disentía en su Gobierno de la guerra de Irak y que siga avalando la tortura, lo retrata. Fue uno de los presidentes mejor manipulados por los halcones y los tiburones económicos. Redujo el prestigio de Estados Unidos, voló el incipiente multilateralismo y quebró toda legalidad internacional a base de presiones, chantajes e imposturas. Sadam era, sin duda, un sátrapa, un tirano, pero no peor que muchos otros que han sido y son amparados por Washington y otras cancillerías.
Estados Unidos ha vivido bajo la presidencia de Bush uno de sus periodos más grises, el de su propia decadencia inexorable. En 2003 el pensamiento neocon se asentó en Washington con una agenda clara, restañar el viejo imperio norteamericano, sentar las bases para dominar el siglo XXI. En esa línea, el inicio de la guerra de Irak, en marzo de 2003, se bautizó Operación Impacto y Pavor. La victoria fue fácil, lo peor vendría después, cuando se vio que EE UU no estaba preparados para la postguerra.
Ni siquiera la ONU, condenada por Bush al silencio, discutió la legalidad de la guerra de Irak. La diplomacia de intereses y los intereses de la diplomacia funcionaron a la perfección. Se presionó en el Consejo de Seguridad para ganar votos y evitar el veto. El 5 de febrero de 2003 se escenificó una de las coreografías más bochornosas de la historia de Naciones Unidas, con Powell y De Palacio mostrando supuestas pruebas y emitiendo discursos agresivos. Con los años culparon a sus servicios secretos de las mentiras sobre las armas de destrucción masiva. Poco les importan los miles de muertos en Irak, las torturas, las cárceles secretas, las vejaciones. Abu Ghraib. Fue una guerra ilegal y amoral. Esa es la desmemoria.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Topics

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?